Hi I'm not a naval architect, but I did run a carolina dory for 17 years.
For a flat bottomed boat they are quite seaworthy,due to their decent freeboard and sensible beam,relative to their length.
Mine would plane to 20 knots but you have to slow down to displacement speeds in a chop.
It was a version of the original, drawn by John Gardner, (who was a naval architect).I mention this because individual designs vary enormously within a hull type.
The St. Pierre dory design,which I was looking at before I built the Carolina,is a very different boat, having an extremely narrow bottom.
However this narrow beam/length ratio limited them to true displacement speeds
The originals had a reputation for being able to survive very bad weather conditions.
.
It looks like the Nexus Marine version that Robbi mentions is an improvement /evolution with a somewhat wider bottom to allow closer to semi displacement speeds.
In my experience, the feature of the'' outboard motor in a well'' should be avoided. In the words of Phil Bolger, (another naval architect),- ''they have all the disadvantages of an inboard, all the disadvantages of an outboard and a few special ones all of their own''.
I rebuilt the back end of my carolina dory after persevering with the well for too many years. The outboard now hangs happily on the new transom,where God meant it to be!
Improvements are: better turning circle,improved bouyancy at the stern,more room in the boat, less noise & less exhaust smell.
Having said all that, have you looked at the C -Dories? I know they're not wooden boats,but- I'm loving mine! And you don't have to build them!!
Dunkley on Retriever
[/b]