san juanderer
New member
Agree with Tom that the insurance topic, is really a non-topic. As an aside is stupid.
As an owner of a pod mounted outboard powered Seasport, my pod has NO pass through to the inside of the transom. My rigging cables go through the same fitting used in the Cutwater owners boat. But my fittings are 4' above the water line. Use good common sense.
The surveyors mention use of two 6" snap in deck plates, some posted a picture that showed screw-in plates with a black sealing o-ring clearly shown.
Fact is, the pod filled with water. Setting the aft end even lower. Water then clearly flowed through the (3) 2" rigging tube fittings into the interior boat hull. As Thataway mentioned, the location of the rigging tube fittings ( entering the pod ) may have had to do more with hiding the rigging tubes than using good common sense as to sea state conditions.
I think the builder is going to feel some pain, there is some poor planning regarding items and there position to the waterline.
As an owner of a pod mounted outboard powered Seasport, my pod has NO pass through to the inside of the transom. My rigging cables go through the same fitting used in the Cutwater owners boat. But my fittings are 4' above the water line. Use good common sense.
The surveyors mention use of two 6" snap in deck plates, some posted a picture that showed screw-in plates with a black sealing o-ring clearly shown.
Fact is, the pod filled with water. Setting the aft end even lower. Water then clearly flowed through the (3) 2" rigging tube fittings into the interior boat hull. As Thataway mentioned, the location of the rigging tube fittings ( entering the pod ) may have had to do more with hiding the rigging tubes than using good common sense as to sea state conditions.
I think the builder is going to feel some pain, there is some poor planning regarding items and there position to the waterline.