Photoshop "101" - Easy tips for better images

JamesTXSD

Active member
On the Wild Blue Cruising thread, there was a discussion regarding the image of our boat decorated with Christmas lights; certainly more of an advanced Photoshop use. I’ve had a few private requests for a more basic discussion, so... as promised, here are a few simple things you can do with Photoshop to make your images look better quickly, and sizing for web use.

I previously discussed the role of the photofinisher in the days of film - it was to get the best image possible from your negative. No custom work, just minor alterations with centering, density, and color. And that’s what we’ll learn about Photoshop with this discussion. Many other imaging software programs have similar adjustments, so hopefully you can apply this information with your choice of software. We use Macs in our home and on our boat... Photoshop for Mac and PC will look quite similar, but your screen image may differ a bit from what you see here; the premise will be similar.

After downloading your images, you first will want to view them to make selections on which images to work with. Photoshop offers a “browse” feature, but the thumbnails are a bit small. I prefer to do a “once over” with an xf-viewer program. Most cameras come with some basic viewing software. Macs come with iPhoto, and PCs have their media viewer equivalence.

We’ve picked our favorite shot and now want to make an image for posting on the web and making a print (2 different uses). I generally like to start with the highest resolution use first.

Open your file in Photoshop.

1OpenImageE.sized.jpg

Most current cameras are 6-10 mg files, so this will come into PS as a 18-30 mg file (6-10 mg in each of the three color channels); a much bigger file than is necessary for making a snapshot size print or web use. The first thing to do is crop and/or resize. In this case, I want a 4x6. Go to the crop tool, set the width to 6, height to 4, and resolution to 300 (250 or 300 is the optomum resolution for making a print; 72 will be the best for web use - we’ll discuss this in more detail later). Now, anywhere you drag your crop tool will result in a 4x6 file.

2CropE.sized.jpg

Cropping is a matter of taste. Keep in mind that the more you crop in, the fewer pixels you will have to work with. Some folks will tell you that a camera with more pixels will allow you more cropping... true to a point. I prefer to crop in the camera to use all the pixels available.

This is the time to correct a horizon line that isn’t level or “zoom in”. With the image cropped, you now have a file size of about 6 mg. More manageable, faster to work with, and good resolution for a 4x6 print (though still too big for web use).

The next step is to make an adjustment for levels; this allows you to correct contrast/light/dark. You can make changes in shadows, highlights, and midtones. The image above is somewhat “flat”; by bringing the shadows down and the highlights up, we can make the clouds pop out more, the water richer, and the shadows of the trees deeper. This is done by going to Image>Adjustments>Level.

3ImageLevelsE.sized.jpg

4ImageLevelsE.sized.jpg

Go to the left side of the bottom of the histogram and move the slider to the right. Usually to where it starts to come into the “bell curve”. Do the same with the slider at the right side, moving it to the left. You can adjust the midrange of the image by moving the middle arrow left or right, as necessary. With “preview” checked, you will see the results immediately.

5ImageLevelsE.sized.jpg

Next step is color adjustment. Again, somewhat subjective. Here, I’ve made a small correction to the overall color by gong to Image>Adjustments>Color Balance.

6ImageBalanceE.sized.jpg

You can play with the sliders to see what color you like best. Some images won’t need any balance, some will.

7amageBalanceE.sized.jpg

And that’s it for most images. The above steps will generally take just a few seconds once you get familiar with the process. And your images will be better as a result.

Be sure to “Save As” and rename the file. Now, you can send it to your printer or put it on a flash drive to take to your local photofinisher.

And the next step: making the image a decent size for web use. If your file size is too large, it will take a LONG time to download. Screen resolution on your monitor is 72, so anything beyond that is simply wasted file size. To resize for posting on the web, simply to to Image>Image Size

8ImageSizeE.sized.jpg

and set the resolution to 72.

9ImageSizeE.sized.jpg

Then determine the size you want. On the C-Brats, I will use 600 pixels or less for the largest dimension (height or width). Plug in that number, the other will take care of itself. Now “Save As” once again. For my purpose, I usually use the same file name with an “e” added at the end. Save the file where you can easily retrieve it (I usually put it on the desktop or into a new “e” folder).

Here’s how the final image will look on the C-Brats...

FinalImageE.jpg

Your new smaller file will upload and download faster.

You now have 3 similar files. Time to clean house. If you will be using the files again, you can keep them in whatever file system you use; if not, toss ‘em (not the original!!).

These few steps will make your images look better and load faster. Now, if you haven’t done so before, it’s time to share some images with us!

Hope you find this useful,
Jim B.

From the Wild Blue thread: http://www.c-brats.com/viewtopic.php?t= ... &start=660

(There have been several discussions on how to put the images in your photo folder here, and how to post as part of your text if desired. Do a search to review those topics.)
 
I hope Jim's Photoshop tutorials inspire you to start exploring how much fun photography can be when you don't have to deal with the demands of a wet darkroom. I've been there, done that. Sold my Hasselblads, Nikons, darkroom equipment, etc. back in the '70s, and until the "digital revolution" arrived I was only a snapshooter with a consumer camera, using photofinishers to turn out 4x6s by the dozens. Now I have a SLR and a Mac with Photoshop -- and am enjoying photography once again.

Although I have the Adobe Creative Suite 3 (which includes the latest Photoshop), for my photographic work I have fallen in love with Adobe Photoshop Lightroom. Adobe has taken almost all of the common Photoshop tools that Jim mentions in his tutorial and put a different, easier-to-use-for-photographers interface on them, in addition to adding many other features designed to assist you in organizing large numbers of images. Photoshop is undeniably more powerful, but it offers so many options that for the occasional user like me, it is difficult to remember the ones I need.

Jim has been using Photoshop probably since the first release. I don't have his in-depth knowledge of and familiarity with the tool, so when Lightroom came out, I found that I spent much less time trying to figure out how to manipulate my images and more time on the creative effort. However, I still use Photoshop along with the other CS3 tools for building web sites.

Apple offers a competing product, Aperture, but I have heard that it is a real resource hog and, of course, it only runs on the Mac, whereas Lightroom is available for Windoze as well. Adobe also offers Adobe Photoshop Elements, which may be capable of some (or maybe all) of the corrections that Jim described, but because I have very limited personal experience with Elements, I cannot say for sure.

Warren

P.S. If you get Lightroom I highly recommend this book.
 
Warren, my story is similar. A major darkroom junkie in the 70's, then for years a snapshot lackie.

Now I am back in photos courtesy of the digital age, and Photoshop Elements (mac version) is absolutely outstanding. I still only know 10% of the program, but it's great. I looked at Lightroom, couldn't see a reason to pay additional $$ beyond Elements. Just got Elements 4, mac, haven't even installed it yet. Supposed to be even easier. Can't say enough positive about Elements,

Bob
 
Warren, My impression is that Lightroom is more of a fast orgizational and work flow tool. It seems much faster than Photoshop and geared for the professional in that aspect. The fine manipulation, with cloning, healing brush etc, still will require one of the photoshop programs, but for the average correction of contrast, brightness, hugh, etc Lightroom works very fast and is easy to use.

I have used 3 versions of Photoshop, and use PS7 and CS currently, but I do most of my work in PS elements--3 on the Mac and 5 on the PC. Photoshop Elements allows most of the manipulation that CS does, but without some of the professional color space which is essential for publications. Layers, cloning, all manor of adjustments and retouching are available in Elements--and that is what I would recommend for a person who wants to get into digital darkroom. The other advantage of PS elements is that it does both organization and automatic editing.

The less expensive cameras paradoxically require less image manipulation. There are parimeters of sharpening, contrast, color balance etc--which can be done in the camera, or in the photoshop--espcially if the shooting is in RAW (which basically means an un processed data). Also most of the photography output is in JPEG--this is a compression storage format, and each time that it is manipulated, there is some loss of quality. The compression is necessary, as Jim noted so it will not take up too much band width when E mailed or put on the web. TIFF and PSD (photoshop) are examples of methods of saving the image, with no loss or little loss of quality, but are very large files. I usually same the file as both JPEG--at moderate compression for internet, and in TIFF for the quality and if I want to work on the photo later. Also with the Canon SLR, I do a certain amount of sharpening--although the latest 40D will give considerable in camera sharpening if you so set it.
 
Jim B. Thank you for your efforts to make a nice clear and helpful thread.

Warren, We have been done that same road, only I didn't dump the hassy soon enough. :cry:

Tyboo: "Hey post some Photos" Well we have both been trying and are missing a step someplace. We haven't given up, just haven't got the time together and found the right hint in the search. thanks for the album though. :thup

Harvey
SleepyC :moon
 
Jim - Thanks!

Harvey - I put a pic in your album, no problem. I think it may illustrate that you have reached the point where you can do it too! You can also delete my pic whenever you like.
 
Mike,

That's cute.

Harvey -
Here's is a previous discussion on how to add photos. If you click on the first word in Oldgrowth Dave's post, there is a link to a pdf that is a tutorial on how to add photos. Since that tutorial was written, the photo album has changed just s teeny bit. Now, instead of having multiple links to the various photo album actions as is shown in Dave's tutorial, there's a single pull down menu labeled <<album actions>>. That pulldown menu contains the "upload photos" option. Here's what it looks like in my album.
NOTE: you will only see this menu when you are in your own album as (unless you are a site admin) you can only add photos to your own album.

(Mike - note that the "Help" link on how to use a photo album is a bit thin and hasn't been edited to reflect the change to a pulldown menu.


PhotoAlbum.gif
 
Thanks JIm

What do folks use to organize images? I tried several but open to any suggestions on new programs and any organizational tips.
 
Photo shop elements has a good organizer--and it fits right in with the corrections.

I have also used ACD See--but concluded since I was already using Photoshop elements, it was easier to just stick with that.

I have read some good reviews of Picasa, free from Google, but not used it.
 
Thanks
I would like something on the fly to use as I come across files, images,. ... I use the Send to Any Folder.. Power Toy to send files to folders.
 
I use Elements 5 much more than I do CS3... CS3 for the publication stuff, but Elements 5 is great. Have not ordered Elements 6 yet because I don't see the need. Cheap upgrade though.

Still have a truckload of old film cameras, Nikons about 15, many rangefinders... guess you can sell 'em by the pound, altho some of my old 50ish Nikons still have value.

Dusty
 
I have the cheap Graphire (by Wacom) 4x5--it works for me, with Photoshop. Usually I am working on a small part of a photo at a time and blowing it way up, for detail work. The larger tablets are very nice, but I didn't think they were cost effective for the work I do. But definately worth having if you do much detailed retouch work.
 
Bob

I have the same one. About $50 after rebate and a full version of Corel Draw. I have used it infrequently and always wondered if I should have purchased the higher end model but this one works fine and fun to use, and at the same time wondered what normal folks use their tablets for tasks compared to the pros.
 
This morning I took a very uninspiring photo from our archives and tweaked it a bit with Photoshop Elements. This is what the original looked like:
Shaganash_Light.sized.jpg


Then I cropped it, selected the sky, land and lighthouse, and water separately, and adjusted lighting levels and contrast. I applied a film grain filter effect, added some color-coordinated script, and a border, and voila - an old postcard!
Shaganash_Light_Postcard.sized.jpg


I continue to be amazed at what is possible with digital photography. And I've barely scratched the surface.
Al
 
Great example of good photo shop work! Our eyes and brains will increase light in shadows and often appear to enhance the contrast. Work like Moose's shows how Photo shop can use the apparently "flat" photo and give it more depth, contrast and better light and shadows.

I have used the pens mostly for restoration of old photographs. I have one of Marie (with a Bikini) and myself at the helm of our Force 50, with the American flag and Catalina Island behind us--it reminds us of what we were 30 years ago and some very good times. The photo has traveled on a number of boats over 100,000 miles at sea--and I suspect that both the photo and we have aged about the same amount. It requires a lot of retouching--often at the single pixel level to 10 pixel levels--so the pen is great for that....Now, if only a pen would fix us! (and help our friends turn back the years!)
 
Back
Top