I see this statement quite often. The earth has an overpopulation problem.
I would respectfully disagree with that statement. Now I would agree there are too many sheeple on the earth but the earth is capable of supporting many more than there are currently.
To put it in perspective, using the current guesstimate of the earths population, you could put the entire world’s population in the state of Texas (½ of 1% of the land mass of the earth) and there would be 1128 sq feet for each person. Or the closest person to you would be 34 feet from you. Or putting it another way, each family of four would have the equivalent of a small city lot to live on.
I will agree some portions of some countries are crowded, but the US is not one of them and the world as a whole is not.
Any country with a declining population is also going to experience a waning society.
Our problem is how we use our resources. The earth has enough to sustain the current population and more. There are more known oil reserves than we have used since man first used petroleum products for heat and energy. If you put most of it off limits, why are you mad at those that produce what is available to us.
Solar power, wind power, wave power and just about every other source of green power is not feasible at this time to supply us with our energy needs. It will probably be more than 50 years before any will, if ever.
We should be using nuclear power for most of our power needs and only use oil for transportation. If we quit heating with and generating electricity with oil we would reduce our dependency on it. Then we should drill every where we know there is oil. If this was our policy, we would not be dependent on the middle east for oil.
We would then have time to develop other sources for our energy needs, if they are needed and we should not be turning our food supply into fuel.
________
Dave 