What's happened to boat sales- 2008-2011

I, for one, do worry that boating seems to be returning to the days of yachting when it was a rich man's activity.

I've done the math every way I can think of and looked at many alternatives and no matter how I try to work the numbers new boats are just expensive. And that bothers me. I know I can't put a new boat out front for sale that the average skilled worker type person can afford; at least one that's more than a 14' skiff and even they're getting expensive.

The new Honda BF250 is now available and we just got pricing. It's got an MSRP of $25,000. Sheesh, my folks just bought a brand new Subaru Forester with some nice features for the same amount of money. I don't get it. How can you take an engine out of a V-6 MDX or Oddysey, get rid of the body, add a lower unit and cowling and end up asking the same price as a whole car?

And don't get me started on gel coat, resin, foam, and fiberglass supplies. For the Marinaut 215 we're paying more for the 9 fiberglass pieces that make up the hull that I paid (as a dealer) for a new C-Dory 22 10 years ago. And we still have to build the thing.

The cost on the windows alone is about $3,000, then the fuel tank folks want their money along with the water tank folks, and the hand rail folks, and the cabinetmaker, and on and on.

At the current price on the M215 we're working at a lower margin that when we sold the C-Dory, Arima, or Rosborough boats. We badly need to raise the price of the boat to have some profit in it but I'm kicking and screaming "no, no, no". I can't win forever though and it pains me to think of how much folks have to part with and how little we actually end up with out of the deal. I won't even figure it on an income-per-hour basis; McDonald's in town pays better. The reasons I keep going are because: I'm stubborn, I'm stupid, it gives me a creative outlet, and because I'm an optimist and think things will eventually get better. It also gives me great pleasure to turn the keys over to a new owner knowing that they're getting a somewhat rare commodity these days...a product built by hand that the folks who did it cared about. I guess it's my way of bucking the trend of everything we buy being built in a foreign country and set out on the lot with a sign that says "Only $350/mo, hurry...sale ends soon".

I'm with Matt on this one...it's got to be a labor of love or it makes no sense whatsoever.

I don't know how we're ever going to return to the day when an average worker type family can afford a new 21-footer again, or how they can afford to run it if they do buy it. One of the overwhelming reasons I took the Marinaut to being only factory direct was because I could see no way to squeeze enough profit out of the situation to allow a dealer to make any profit at all.

There have been (unsubstantiated) rumors of Arima going to a factory direct sales model and if that happens I wouldn't blame them at all. I think the days of the traditional boat dealer are numbered without a major correction in the economy. There will always be folks that can afford to go buy a new boat and there will be dealers that can afford to stay in business but it will have to be on quite a different model than in the past. Rather that relying on sales of several boats with smaller profits we're going to have to rely on selling fewer more expensive boats (with higher profits) to the fewer folks that can afford them.

Most small dealers can't afford to write checks for the boat inventory they're going to have in stock (just like most car dealers). We rely on floor plan money from a commercial lender to support our inventory purchases. About 4 years ago that cost us about 6% in interest. After the economy debacle the only lender left in the game now wants 14% if you're not a very large dealership using them almost 100% for your floor plan activity. With the low margins these days dealers can't afford to pay that kind of interest and we all know it's the customer that ends up paying it (raising the prices of already expensive boats even more). The customer has to pay it, if the dealership pays it they close unless they started with a large fortune and they're trying to make a small one out of their investment.

So now customers lament the fact that there's no local dealership for purchase or support, but those places can't afford to bring in boats and potential buyers aren't going to be happy with the prices. I'm the perfect example...I've got the Marinaut 215 priced at $46,400 right now and that's really not giving us any profit to speak of. If an east coast dealer wanted to sell them they'd be on the lot for $52,200 (and on a tight margin at that) plus about $4,000 or so in transportation (but that has to be paid whether the boat is purchased out west or in the east). I can't imagine any dealer wanting to bring them in for that kind of money and then pay flooring interest on top of it. Add $10K for a 90 of some sort, another $4K for a basic trailer, and you're up to $66,000 before you've added any electronics or accessories.

At EQ we used to stock the Rosborough RF-246. We simply can't do that any longer, we just can't afford 14% interest on a $100K hull sitting out front on display. That hurts sales because it's a lot harder to sell boats you can't show. The reaction from most builders is that you have to buy boats or you can't be a dealer. A dealer in that position usually says goodbye, not because they don't like the boat but simply because they can't afford to inventory them, there's just not enough sales volume and profit to justify it. It then hurts the builder because they no longer have that dealer talking about the boat and spreading the word so they loose potential sales. Many builders think that everyone will just buy from the factory but I can tell you from our time as a C-Dory dealer with the factory a couple hours down the road also selling the boats that we still had lots of customers buying from us as well; and a lot of those sales would not have gone to the factory if we hadn't been here so it would have been a net loss for them for us to be gone. As a factory you can only do so much if your production schedule gets busy and that doesn't include highly customizing boat for each customer. The answer for us with regard to the Marinaut was just to stay small and do them one at a time. In the future if things get better and there's enough margin in the boats to allow for dealers maybe the Marinaut will go that way too but at that point it will be someone else's decision and concern...I'll be retired by that point. :)

Triton has a harder row to hoe than we do. There are expectations placed on them due to the history of the C-Dory and largely because of the C-Brats. The C-Brat group is a double-edged sword: on one side it's a great resource and a reason for folks to want a C-Dory but on the other side it's a great place to find out that one can purchase a used C-Dory that (at least physically) does the same thing as the new ones and it also lends voice to hundreds (thousands if they wanted to participate) of folks that have a vision of what C-Dory should be (based on what it used to be). That vision ended in 2000 and it's not coming back until the economy improves and Triton has the opportunity to make a name for itself.

It's easy enough to tell them they need to change their website, do a newsletter, participate in boat shows, and such but someone has to do all that work. You either have to pay someone to do it (expensive) or one of the salaried principals (the "owners" that work for free) has to do it. If someone already at the company does it that means they're giving up that time from doing something else (like getting a boat built) that's probably already behind.

Look how many Marinaut boats we're pumping out, and I'm already beyond my eyeballs in conversations, quotes, putting the boats together, and trying to take care of marketing (which is different thing than sales). If we were doing a boat a month I'd be lucky to find time for anything other than just flat keeping up.

With margins (profits) as low as they are no one can afford to have extra folks hanging around to do the odds and ends. Yes, if you do all the extra things it should result in more sales but it doesn't generate that income instantly and pay for the folks you've got employed. So it doesn't happen. And it's not likely to happen because most folks in the boat building business (small builders) don't have deep pockets; if they did they'd invest their money somewhere else. They're in it for the love and challenge of it and for a hoped for reward down the road.

When you're running on next next to nothing trying to meet payroll and expenses digging in your pocket for another $5,000 (or whatever) to, say, go the Seattle Boat Show is a major expense and not to be taken lightly no matter how much you know you should be there. It's just not that easy. It's easy to sit in the armchair and blast away and say "well, it's just something you've got to do". Fine. Line up at the builder's door and tell them you've got a few thousand dollars you'd like to invest in the company so they can do more shows, run more ads, travel with the boats and show them off, and hire folks to make the website nicer and put out a newsletter ('cause the person doing it now is probably one whose name is on the owner's list).

Sorry if this seems like a diatribe. If it was easy everyone would do it. If you think it's still easy you do it or at least put some money where your mouth is (buy a boat or invest).

Les
 
Les-

Thanks for the insights and honesty!

We all appreciate your dedicated endeavors and wish you and your team the success you deserve!

Hope to be able to come up to the Get Together in January and see you and your dad, Dusty!

Joe. :teeth :thup
 
I agree that this is well said, Les. Your explanation should be placed in a prominent position so when the subject arises again (does that ever happen around here? :roll: ) it can be resurrected and reposted.
 
Les,

Betty and I felt guilty as you worked more than 45 straight days on our boat -- and we knew that those were appreciably more than 8-hour days! We really appreciated you and all those who worked so hard on our behalf.

Adding to what you have said, and for the edification of the C-Brats group, there is another important issue at hand in failure to sell boats these days, which I don't think people in the Pacific Northwest fully appreciate. On the East Coast, the price of boating is outrageously expensive. For example, our CD 16 Cruiser cost about $6,000 per year in total costs, which included the cost of insurance, gasoline for 100 hours of use, marina costs and routine maintenance. In comparison, the Marinaut will cost about $7,200 (which is near the limit for what we would like to pay for leisure activity of this sort; one could stay in a lot of hotel rooms for $7,000/year.)

Transient fees are outrageous. We quote El and Bill of Halcyon: "We did discover, however, that the cost of cruising in Connecticut is the highest we have seen yet. Marinas charge outlandishly high rates for an overnight transient stay, if they have space. Most of the coves are filled with moorings leaving little or no room for a transient boat to anchor. So, although there is nice water and there are many interesting towns to visit, it is difficult for a non-resident cruising boater to travel this coast." ( http://cruisingamerica-halcyondays.com/conn.) In contrast, In Anacortes, WA we only paid about $17 per night for a transient berth.

In Connecticut, we nearly killed the boating industry with taxes or the threat of taxes on boats, boating services and slips, which is why we never recovered those 5,000 boating industry jobs that were lost in the last taxing debacle of a few year's ago. The State of Connecticut had the third-highest tax burden in the nation.

There are so many large boats in marinas in New England, owned by working class people, who don't take their boats out due to the high price of fuel.
At the fuel dock, it is typical to pay 50 cents more per gallon than at the pump for one's auto.

I think that for power boats to survive, manufacturers will have to come up with new innovations. For example, diesel outboards have been discontinued, but perhaps leading manufacturers should closely re-examine these engines. In fact, several year's ago, Honda was working on a gasoline-powered diesel, now others are taking interest (see recent article in below URL.) A gasoline-powered diesel engine on a Marinaut or CD22 may have the potential to reach 10 MPG. Just think what this could do for the boating industry. Other types of innovation potential would be in boating materials and innovative lower-cost construction techniques. On the Marinaut -- you strove to extract as much weight as you could from the boat. How about powering a boat with a fuel cell if the cost point is right? It may be that there are exciting new technologies for powering and constructing boats that could create a renewal in the boating industry. Only time will tell, but we would not bet against American inginuity to come up with a way.

[/url] http://www.smartplanet.com/blog/thinkin ... iency/7190
 
We can't have it both ways. I've a relationship with my local marine shop and he knows that not charging me out the wazoo while still having a decent markup will result in me continuing to buy from him.

To us boat owners I say "Support your local dealer and quit being penny pinchers." To the dealers, genericly speaking, (as I've never met any of the fine dealers on this site I am obviously not speaking to them) "You can't do it the way you used to. You've got to, sort of, compete with the internet".

I walk through the door at Gwinnett Marine and am greeted with "Hey Vince. What-cha' need today?" Sometimes I need advice and sometimes I spend money. Try that with a web-site.

Zap
 
rogerbum":3v469heh said:
A few things - the average item that cost $32,000 in 1993 would cost about $50,245 in 2011 due to average 57% rate of inflation. Boats have gone up in cost a bit faster due to a large percentage of the cost being in raw materials and due to the fact that the raw materials re tied directly to oil prices. Hence I would disagree with the statement that raw materials prices went up "for no damn good reason".

However, I agree with your main point is that the buying power of the average guy has gone down relative to inflation. During that same duration of time, the average wage in the US went up about 48% but much of that increase is driven by those in the upper income brackets whose net income went up at a much faster rate than the average guy (see the U.S. Census Bureau data or this link for recent U.S. historical income data.

Roger,

I like your response about why materials went up, but I wasn't clear enough. In fact, I didn't explain it all. Sorry about that. The cost of materials did not go up do to an oil shortage, they went up mostly due to speculators at the stock market level. It had almost nothing to do with supply and demand and it had to do with fantasy almost completely. While I don't remember correctly, I think the demand actually went down while the prices were going up....Go figure.... Exxon, BP, and the other business owners wanted more profit. And they got it big time by massaging the system. It seemed to be legal (or at least nothing could be proven when congress "investigated"), but it was unethical. Whatever though.....There is nothing we can do about it.

Thanks for sharing the interesting link pertaining to income of the classes. It does however, add to how depressing all this is....LOL...It is no secret the average guy has gotten the screws in the last 15 years or so. The data just makes the taste buds sour even more.

BTW, if you want a "new" CD 25, you can get one right now at Alaska Mining and Diving for right around 75,000 with nothing...not even a promise to fix anything that might go wrong with the hull. Heck, it doesn't even come with motor. They can't be serious can they??? Check it out for yourselves. http://akmining.com/boat/c-dory.htm
 
Reading all the post one gets the true feeling of several members. The very same feelings written down on this site most of us feel. How can we not. The bottom line we have gotten ourselves in quiet a mess in this country and we all have to take some responsibility for what we have. We all like to save money and in some cases its a must. Every time we buy something that has been made over seas we hit the nail with the hammer one more time.

We must take care of this country and support business that are trying there hardest to survive. More and more I read the label to see where the product was made and if it's not made in the good old USA I put it back on the shelf. I'll get off the soap box now and get back to enjoying all that this site has to offer. :)

H :wink:
 
I understand that there is an increasing number on boats being repossessed. At home foreclosure the boat is near first to go. :(
Where is the best source or list of these vessels? What are the banks going to do with all these boats? :shock:
 
I really appreciate the perspective Les gives. It feels true.

The picture, while at first seems dismal but I think just foreshadows a change in economic conditions for the middle class in America. We just added the 7 billionth person to the planet a few weeks ago. The 300 million of those fortunate enough to live in the U.S. have been living better than most of the others for quite some time. I believe for very good reasons. Some related to fortune and many related to hard work and ingenuity of the American people. We set an example and many in the rest of the world, starting with Japan, decided the example was a good one to follow.

As the CFO of a mid-sized non-profit I have spent a lot of time in India over the last two decades. I can tell you they placed great emphasis on education and hard work. If someone is as well educated and works as hard as someone in the U.S. should they receive equal rewards? Well right now they earn about 1/7 what a U.S. worker would. But, that is changing rapidly.

My daughter, her husband, and my two grandchildren have lived in China for the last six years. Same sort of story there. Now both these countries face huge problems which is beyond the scope of this missive but the truth is the world is changing, like it or not.

So where does that leave the U.S.? Well, I am also an optimist and believe we will learn to compete but in the end we may never see the relative wealth we had in the 1960s to the early 2000s. Will we ever be able to have the average skilled U.S. worker be able to spend the equivalent of $75,000 for a 22 foot C-Dory? I wonder. Perhaps, if it is true that a rising tide raises all boat there may come a time when such is the case across the world. It may also never happen. We may be back to the early 1950s when a 1000 sq ft house and a used car was the norm for a U.S. family.

Would there be a place for C-Dory type boat builders in such a world? I am sure for a very limited number of them. But, I think there may be many unexpected opportunities to put boats under people who may find it a sacrifice to spend as much on a boat as they would on a new Honda minivan, never mind as much as a starter home.

What kind of opportunities? Well, I am a relatively old man and I think American ingenuity lives in the young who will want to go to sea in a C-Dory class boat and will find a way.

Perhaps, in the future, there will be ways a person who wants a boat can "volunteer" time to a company building their boat. Perhaps there is a way for "volunteers" to pool such efforts and resources providing website skills, or marketing, or transportation, or carpentry skills in exchange for a percentage of ownership of a boat. I do not minimize the difficulty of coordinating such volunteer contributions but some organizations do it already. The Monterey Bay Aquarium could not operate without their volunteers. Yes, I do not know of any "manufacturing" organizations using volunteer efforts but perhaps in the future now models will develop.

Ok, this is getting longer than I intended so I will offer only one other thought. If a fiberglass hull is sound it can last for how long? I don't know, but I wonder if 100 years is a possibility. I had a Columbia 24 that was 45 years old and there was nothing wrong with the hull. Perhaps it was stronger than when new. No blisters (easily fixed if it had) and it was built like a tank, including nearly a 1000 pounds of lead in the keel. It seems if so much of the cost of a new boat is in materials, such as resins etc, then there should be the possibility of remanufacturing popular boats using the very valuable hulls. Even rebuilding transoms, as demonstrated by a number of C-brats here is not an overwhelming task. Could a C-Dory be rebuilt to incorporate Marinaut features? Would the type of individual like Les, who is a true inventory and innovator be interested in doing such a thing? Perhaps not, would it be something that could be licensed from him? Again I don't know but. I am not so arrogant as to believe that being a C-Dory owner and even life long boater gives me the knowledge to evaluate such questions but I know there are people out there with the skills and knowledge to find such solutions. I have had the pleasure to meet and talk with Ron Moore of the famous Moore sailboats a few times and I know such people do have what it takes to determine these things.

If a rebuilt C-Dory could be had for $40-45K then it might work. It would take a sharp pencil to work the details but I do hope the American worker will always be able to go to sea in a C-Dory equivalent boat. If it is important enough to them, they will find a way!

Ron
 
The Mrs. and I started looking for a larger boat we could live on for longer periods in the Spring of 2009. I had bought the 22 in 2003 and although I was aware prices were rising, I hadn't really kept up with them from a buyer perspective and of course experienced sticker shock to the max on anything new. The Ranger Tug got crossed off immediately as was the CD 27 and everything else in short order. It didn't take a brain surgeon to realize you could buy a quality diesel boat for much less on the used market, get the fuel mileage, have the adventures, fix it up if needed, and even sell the boat at a loss if you had to for much less expense than buying the new boats in the class we're speaking of. Thus entered the "Mischief" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rjHNSzZ0PxE our Prairie 29 trawler. Re-engined (it's on its 3rd now after multiple owners and trips) and built with no wood in the hull it will be re-engined again and cruising long after we're gone.

Now with the last post, I find the boat we use now for camping and trailer excursions (our venerable CD22) new would buy 2 or 3 Prairies . . . Where does it end? Some re-set will have to take place I'm afraid, because our entire system is radically out of balance with reality of what people can reasonably afford.
 
REBEMUP":5xn6uyj9 said:
<snipped> It seems if so much of the cost of a new boat is in materials, such as resins etc, then there should be the possibility of remanufacturing popular boats using the very valuable hulls.

Hi Ron,

Actually, at least with the Marinaut, the cost of the hull shell (9 pieces) is about 1/3 of the total cost of the finished hull; not the finished boat but just the boat itself as delivered at the same level as a new C-Dory or Arima would be. All the materials together (interior cabinetry, rails, tanks, etc) represent about 1/2 the total cost of the finished boat.

In a true "factory" setting where the fiberglassing is done in house the cost of the hull materials would be even lower. I estimated if we built a chopper gun boat "in house" that the hull would cost about 1/2 what it currently does. However, the cost of the having the "factory" would be much higher and for a lower production boat like the Marinaut the numbers (at least for me) didn't work.

Something that does happen is that the cost of a new hull over time becomes so much higher than what the hull originally cost that it becomes more valuable due to that fact and therefore worth restoring.

Even if you purchased a $25,000 CD22 that's been well used and maybe a bit ragged and put $10K into it for refurbishing you'd be about half the cost of a new one. And if you put another $10K into for a new engine you'd still have $45K into it as opposed to around $70K; that $35K difference certainly buys a lot of other things. This is for an owner refurb.

The odd part is, we've found it very difficult to do that in general on a professional basis. Not many boats will stand the cost of being professionally refurbished. Everything but the hull costs the same on a new boat or a used one. That includes the outboard, electronics, accessories, trailer, etc.

So if a pro shop is going to completely rebuild an older boat you'd have to allot about $35K for engine, electronics, trailer, and such (the same $35K you'd spend for those items on a new boat). Then you need to refurb the old boat (fix what's wrong, paint, etc) and that might amount to $5K to $10K.

You can buy a new hull for $40K (ish) and maybe the old one for (say) $15K (or call it $45k and $20K). Add the cost of the old hull refurb ($5k-10K) and you end up with a total difference of $15K to $20K. Still a good sum of money but will folks pay (say) $50K to $55k for a totally refurbished boat (new paint, new motor, new electronics, new trailer, etc)? Or will the allure of new make them stretch that extra $15K to $20K? This is as much a question for me as it is anyone else, I don't know the answer either.

On Edit: Ron, my figures are higher than yours for a refurbished CD22 because I'm likely using higher figures for new electronics and such (because it's what we usually install on new boats). Certainly a refurbished CD22 could be put on the market for much less with more basic equipment.
 
Les,

In your response to Ron in which you questioned, "...will the allure of new make them <prospective buyers> stretch that extra $15K to $20K?" -- Betty and I would say that if all things were equal, then the allure of new would not be worth the extra money. The buyer needs to make a decision as to precisely what he or she is looking for in a boat, and if that person can't find a boat with those characteristics or features in something used, they would tend to gravitate to a boat that is new, like we did.

Betty and Rich
 
Another thought-

If you did all of the updating to an older shell, would your insurance company insure it for its value?

In other words, if you buy a new $65,000 22 Cruiser, the insurance company will insure the new boat for what you paid for it.

But if you take a 1990 22 Cruiser, and renew it and wind up with $50,000 in it, the insurance company will look at that boat as a 1990 for value. Yes, the new engine will bring the value up, but the shell won't be worth what you'd have invested in it, at least not to the insurance company. So you would have to self insure the difference, and should one have a total loss, it will require arguing value with the adjusters.

Come resell time, you will have a 1990 boat, with newer power, and probably won't get what you have invested in it- probably nowhere near that amount.
 
Matt,

That's something a lot of us may not have considered. Our new boat was insured for full replacement value for three years. If we sustained a total loss on a refurbished, used, 1990 boat, we'd get next to nothing for it.

Rich
 
Matt Gurnsey":xjjk15ey said:
Another thought-

If you did all of the updating to an older shell, would your insurance company insure it for its value?

In other words, if you buy a new $65,000 22 Cruiser, the insurance company will insure the new boat for what you paid for it.

But if you take a 1990 22 Cruiser, and renew it and wind up with $50,000 in it, the insurance company will look at that boat as a 1990 for value. Yes, the new engine will bring the value up, but the shell won't be worth what you'd have invested in it, at least not to the insurance company. So you would have to self insure the difference, and should one have a total loss, it will require arguing value with the adjusters.

Come resell time, you will have a 1990 boat, with newer power, and probably won't get what you have invested in it- probably nowhere near that amount.

Superb points Matt. Thanks! :thup

Les
 
Wild Blue:

I personally had no idea that there were "Stated Value" boat insurance policies, at the risk of being a pest, could you please elaborate? For example, why can't I state that in my opinion, a CD 25 is worth $250,000 and insure it for that price, paying the rather modest insurance fee? Or do you work with your insurance company to arrive at a mutually agreeable stated price? In either case, would you mind my asking what insurance company you are using, because I and others would be inclined to obtain insurance from your company? This is especially true for those of us living on the East Coast who are in peril of suffering catastrophic loss due to hurricanes that visit our shores.

Thanks!

Rich
 
Actually, the term is "agreed value". Usually this is either the value of the new boat when you bought it, or based on an independant survey of your vessel, in the case of a used vessel. The insurance company will usually require a survey of your boat every few years to determine its current value.
 
Back
Top