Not to continue this thread needlessly long - I thought some of the 'Brats might find a wrap-up to this story interesting.
I've spent some time the past few days trying to check-out my options.
(1) ARS 11-1014 permits police agencies to take a dog bite case to a Justice of the Peace and seek a destruction order. Yavapai County Sheriff's Office (YCSO) is not willing to do that because the animals didn't have a "history" of attacks. (The fact that YCSO didn't bother to investigate where the puppies were from didn't come up until I asked the Animal Control Supervisor that questionthis morning. She's going to "...get back to me on that." Oops.) Late Update: The supervisor did call me back, and the dogs have been in this area for three years, with no previous problem; so I actually do feel somewhat better.
(2) The severity of my injuries evidently didn't warrant YCSO seeking a destruction order. (My hospital bill was only a tad over $1600.) True I suppose, and my leg bites seem to be healing rather well.
(3) Being blocked at every turn, I finally relented and asked the deputy to proceed with citations. He agreed to the citation, and I suggested one for each dog. He eventually wrote three citations for "Dog at Large." That's the same ticket YCSO gives for not having your Pekinese or LhasaApso on a leash; evidently bites and attacks are free..
(4) I asked the deputy to make the tickets "mandatory appearance" (before a JP), but he couldn't/wouldn't do that. If it was a mandatory appearance in Justice Court I could at least be present to articulate my side of the case. It sounded like the dog owner agreed to the "Dog at Large" tickets during a phone conversation. The deputy wrote her three tickets, and I have no doubt the tickets will be totally ignored since the puppies will be going to their new home in Bakersfield (CA) moments after they're released from quarantine on Friday (6/17). If nothing else, this represent a masterful example of kicking-the-can-down-the-Road. I may send a copy of the YCSO incident report and my Victim Statement to Bakersfield just for grins.
(5) Back on the day of the attack, the deputy didn't find it necessary to procure the names/addresses of any witnesses or ask me for a Victim Statement "...since the dog caretaker didn't contest the fact they were At Large." This has got to be one of the fastest case "closures" on record; by all means avoid paperwork!
(6) And finally, since I have no standing before the Court I am advised that I cannot proceed without a personal attorney, and then only civilly. (With some other major issues going on in my life at this time, I can't really take the time or effort to do that.) ...but I have bounced the issue (and my unsolicited Victim Statement) over to the County Attorney in Prescott. ...not that they'll do anything, but at least I took one more final swing at the ball.
Although I worked as a sworn officer/special agent mostly in the federal LE sector for slightly over thirty years; I have (regrettably) had to reconsider some of my thoughts on abilities of the local constabulary. Sad.
The bottom line My Friends, is that in many situations - don't count on much assistance from the public sector - we're largely on our Own.
Casey