Roger is concerned about commercialization of -our- weather sites. This might very well be a problem, but it would depend on how this all plays out, and in particular, what is the value added, if any?
I went to a (legitimate) business development/inventors seminar several years ago, and one of the opportunities being discussed was the licensing and commercialization of all the satellite and aerial photo data that was becoming available. The suggested possibilities included land-use management, disaster planning, insurance evaluations, etc. etc. . . . Obviously these would be massive, capital-intensive undertakings.
Now 6-8 years later we have (Keyhole --> ) Google Earth, Zillow.com, and many other valuable applications. Some (Zillow) 'free' (with advertizing); others (Google Earth) free at the basic level, with 'pro' and 'enterprise' levels available at low and high cost, respectively. As most of you are probably aware, the network news uses Google Earth to zoom from a satellite view to a local view, whether in your neighborhood, New Orleans (post-Katrina), or Iraq.
On the flip side, do we all remember the origins of 'cable TV'? ("Why would anyone want to pay for TV? We already get everything we need for free!") Am I the only one who remembers that one of the 'logical' (?) answers to this question was, "There won't be any commercials! You'll be paying for the cost of the programming via cable fees, but then you won't be bothered by commercials!" With the advent of 'reality TV', we all know how low we've sunk. Not only do we have endless commercials during the shows (7-1/2 minutes straight, timed recently), many of the shows are commercials! And of course, we have endless shows building choppers 'on strict (artificial) deadlines', "Having a baby", "Wedding Party", "While you were out", "Fear Factor", and finally (what can I say?), 24 hours of Anna Nicole Smith, Britney Spears, Tom Cruise, etc.
But, I digress . . . back to the weather. I can imagine great possibilities for commercial dissemination of weather info, in inexpensive (or free) formats, far beyond what we would expect (or be willing to fund) NOAA to provide. The end results could be phenomenal, or they could be an expensive PITA, beyond our wildest dreams.
iggy