Larry H":21x7n23l said:
Here is a link to a site that has a comparison of the areas of Europe and the USA.
http://goeurope.about.com/od/europeanmaps/l/bl-country-size-comparison-map.htm
The largest countries in Europe are Spain and France, and both are about the same size as Texas.
Their transit solutions probably won't work in the USA due to size and population density.(emphasis added by Roger)
I hear that argument a lot - not only related to transit but also related to other issues. Several comments:
1) The transportation system in Europe spans many countries. It's actually pretty seamless to take a train from one part of Europe to another.
2) The population density in Europe is not quite twice that of the US - 112 people/sq mile vs about 83 people/sq mile (
source). However, we have vast areas with very few people in them that reduce the population density by a lot. If one looks at say just the east coast or just the west coast, the population density of most of those states is higher than the average population density of Europe. 21 out of 50 states have a population density higher than that of Europe. These are:
NJ, RI, MA, CT, MD, DE, NY, FL, OH, PA, CA, IL, HA, VI, NC, IN, MI, GA, TN, SC and NH (also the DoC). Even our state of WA has a population density of about 100 people/sq mile and Texas has a population density of about 80 people/sq mile). So while it's true that we might not want a transportation system similar to Europe in say MT, WY, AK or the Dakota's, it's definitely possible to have a similar system in the parts of the US where most people live.
It's a matter of priorities and to date our national priorities are not focused on efficiency in transportation. If one looks back about 20+ years, gasoline cost less per gallon than bottled water so it's no surprise that efficient transportation was not a major issue.
3) One "advantage" Europe had is that much of it's transportation infrastructure was destroyed during WWII and rebuilt thereafter (with a lot of help from the U.S.). Maybe if our roads were all destroyed in a war we would build a more efficient system.