I wish I was making that decision now instead of 6 years from now, when we plan to buy one and embark on the Great Loop.
I was the Seattle Boat show today and got into an interesting discussion with a C-Ranger rep. He noted that the C-Ranger 21 depreciation has been minimal through the 10 years they have been building them. In addition, the original Nordic Tug 26 footers are probably worth more now than they were 20 years ago.
Which brings me to my question. Assume the C-Ranger 25 will incur minimal depreciation the next 5 years. Wouldn't it be smart to buy one new, enjoying the security of a warranty, vs. buying a used one. In our case, we would sell it after one year or so, perhaps losing 10-15k. That might be acceptable.
It's rather hard for me to think in this manner. All my toys were used. The laptop I'm pounding on was used. Heck, some of my clothes are used.
Oh....one more thing that really sells me about the C-Ranger, vs. other boats in it's size. They are now being optionally equipped with a Cummins 130 hp...a quieter and more powerful engine.
Nice!
-Greg
I was the Seattle Boat show today and got into an interesting discussion with a C-Ranger rep. He noted that the C-Ranger 21 depreciation has been minimal through the 10 years they have been building them. In addition, the original Nordic Tug 26 footers are probably worth more now than they were 20 years ago.
Which brings me to my question. Assume the C-Ranger 25 will incur minimal depreciation the next 5 years. Wouldn't it be smart to buy one new, enjoying the security of a warranty, vs. buying a used one. In our case, we would sell it after one year or so, perhaps losing 10-15k. That might be acceptable.
It's rather hard for me to think in this manner. All my toys were used. The laptop I'm pounding on was used. Heck, some of my clothes are used.
Oh....one more thing that really sells me about the C-Ranger, vs. other boats in it's size. They are now being optionally equipped with a Cummins 130 hp...a quieter and more powerful engine.
Nice!
-Greg