Foggy":cl4f5ji9 said:
These "smaller" boats, CDs and others, with their ease to beach and trailer (IMHO a 60 mph highway stone may be more problem than hitting a floating bottle at 25 mph) may require more vigilance than some of their bigger cousins.
I don't get that feeling, myself. I'm not a structural engineer, but I feel like the forces that generate structural problems go up so exponentially in bigger boats, that our smaller boats have an easier time of it. NOT that vigilance is not required - I think it is on almost any boat (well okay, the aluminum skiffs I grew up with on fresh water were pretty much "use and forget"), but just that bigger boats tend to have larger open areas, thus larger, more highly stressed panels with more "movement" likely (which is not a good thing). Also, a trailered boat will often be kept out of the water more. It's ironic (and opposite to a traditional wooden boat), but the best thing you can do for a fiberglass boat is keep it out of the water and, ideally, stored indoors. Not that that's the best for fun, but just for longevity.
C-Nile":cl4f5ji9 said:
If you are talking about new boats, I recommend avoiding balsa cored boats altogether. I ran into water intrusion issues on my new CD 16 cruiser, and it resulted in a hefty repair bill.
I have to disagree somewhat. I can see where the balsa core on my 22 could have been compromised (if the boat had not been stored indoors before I got to it and took care of the issues); but then I have read plenty of threads on, say, the CC23's having water in the foam core construction (I researched because I was looking at a CC23 and the 22 at the same time). The problem in both cases is water getting in to (or potentially getting in to) improperly sealed openings (say, where fuel tank cleats are screwed into cored areas). Yes, balsa can rot, but that's after water has been in there a looong time. Foam can de-bond once water gets in, which is not a lot better, IMO. Essentially, one should keep water out of cored areas, whatever they be cored with. Balsa and foam are each superior to the other in certain ways; personally, I wouldn't eschew either, but poor construction practices can be irritating (with either).
C-Nile":cl4f5ji9 said:
How can you ever know for sure if your particular boat does not have a defect in manufacture?
You can't, unless you were at the boat shop watching, or later take things apart to be sure. But that applies to any type of construction. I looked at a very nice, well-thought-of, well-designed 23 foot sailboat once that I wanted to buy. It was foam cored. The foam had de-bonded from the fiberglass skins and would have required extensive repairs. It happens sometimes (in fact maybe sometimes builders/owners worry less because "I have foam core, not wood" but it's still important to keep water out, and if a kerfed foam was used and the kerfs not filled, there are ready pathways for water movement as the boat "breathes" -- in both balsa and foam).
As much as I hate to know it's true, I have never seen a boat without defects in construction. Of course this bugs me no end, as I'm a perfectionist!
C-Nile":cl4f5ji9 said:
(hand laid fiberglass hull with vinyl ester resin and a closed cell foam core)
I think the Marinauts are a great design and well built, with good materials. But then I think they would be equally well built with balsa core, if the same people were building them. So for me it comes back to construction quality - usually in the details when it's small boats like ours (that don't require a lot of design/structural engineering).