25 Cruiser questions

Actually, it all is relative and depends on what you have experienced prior;
what boat, what kind of ride. And, length is ride.

In comparing, often it is not "apples to apples". The best advice is to get
aboard the boat you are interested in purchasing and take it for a test drive.
If you are early on the learning curve, watch out. What seems 'good' now
will change.

And, there is no perfect boat. The best you can do is determine your primary
use, do your homework, take test drives then make your purchase and hope
you don't change your mind too soon.

Boat ownership is work in progress; much like a sailor who has been detained at
sea then goes ashore to find himself in a roomful of pretty ladies. Otherwise, why
would our Dr Bob have (had) so many (boats)?


Aye
 
Boat ownership is work in progress; much like a sailor who has been detained at
sea then goes ashore to find himself in a roomful of pretty ladies. Otherwise, why
would our Dr Bob have (had) so many (boats)?

The question was posed by a couple who had taken a ride in the C Dory 25--a boat which they were interested in buying.

I buy a boat for a specific reason. If I was to buy one C Dory, it would be the 25. (The Venture 26 would be in the same category). We came very close to buying another C Dory 25 about a year ago and leaving it at Lake Powell--but decided because of health issues it would not be wise. The major reason we bought the second 22 vs a 25, was the truck--I was not going to buy a new truck--which would not serve the same function as the Yukon--as a "towed", as well as a truck..

As for pretty women--I take mine with me! Whats better than a wife who is as passionate about boating as I am? :)
 
Hi John,
A couple of notes on that 2-3 foot head sea in our experience with the 22 and 25:
-If we are out and all of sudden those seas come up and you going to a destination, we have either put up with it until arriving or turned around and gone another way to get there, especially in the San Juans when there was another route.
-Choosing to stay out and go through it, we drop our speed until we are comfortable, that could be from 6-9 mph sog. Because of local conditions due to tide and wind, we oftentimes have driven to a better sea state and then speed up.
-We would not choose to stay out in 2-3 footers for a longer than comfortable period of time. Listening to and reading forecasts is a given and like others, try to avoid rough water. There are some situations that you can drive through to calmer waters and others to just avoid.
-Either way you slice it, 25 cruiser or 255 Tom Cat, you will be happy, I think.
At the B'ham gathering we took another couple that is interested in the 25 for a sunset ride, Doug and Donna, who are selling their sailboat. They, like you two, were all smiles with what the 25 cruiser has to offer.
Good Luck in your search, the right boat is waiting for you guys!
 
My question about softness of ride in a head sea was prompted in part by Bob Austin's post at 7:25pm on 8/11 in a discussion under "TomCat." The boat that would allow me to minimize pounding in chop up to 4' would likely be my choice between the Cruiser and TomCat. I was reminded again last Thursday how much my wife truly hates pounding when we took our 22' Cobalt open bow (hard chine V, 20 degree deadrise aft) from Gig Harbor to Seattle to meet our son for lunch. That's a great boat for water sports, and very fast, but you can't slow down enough in even a foot or two of chop to avoid pounding because it drops off plane at 18mph and the (open bow) nose buries...Gotta keep the bow up, but then it's a constant battle to stay just up on step but not so fast as to get slammed around...Not the best of times for us as a couple... Whatever we do, we'll keep the Cobalt. It serves the purposes for which we bought it (day trips and water sports here in South Sound) beautifully.
But we have enjoyed years of boating together and miss our cruising days when we enjoyed the San Juans, Gulf Islands, Princess Louisa, etc, and we'd like a head and cabin heat for winter boating, which we miss as well.
We've had a number of boats over the years: 17' Chris Craft open bow with an outboard, 20' Apollo runabout with an I/O, 32' Uniflite with twin gas inboards, 42' Uniflite with twin diesels, and now the Cobalt. Perhaps my favorite is the 11.5' Bullfrog with a 30hp Honda that we also currently have. We bought it as a beach boat for going back and forth to the Cobalt at the buoy, but I run all over the place locally in it. I've never owned a cat, though I've driven a 32' Zeta and spent two weeks at a time on my father-in-law's 42' Zeta fishing in the Broughtons. As a yacht broker for several years, I also got some experience with Grand Banks and various semi-displacement boats. All we've owned, though, have been modified V planing hull boats.
We both find the C-Dory intriguing and appealing as a fairly simple, well laid out, great looking, economical, hopefully comfortable couple's boat for off season use and an easy single hander for getaways for me alone once in awhile. The TomCat offers more spacious accommodations and the benefits of a cat's ride. But that one consideration remains paramount I think: which would most likely be easiest on us when the winds kick up and oppose the current, creating those steep close chop conditions?
It's hard to sell any owner on the idea of taking you out in their boat in lousy conditions, so I haven't tried. Our ride with Patrick and Kim made quite a compelling case for the 25 Cruiser in mild conditions. Kevin and Kari Ware had offered to take us out in their TomCat in Bellingham last weekend, but we ended up having to cancel. Master Marine offered a sea trial, but only if we first signed a deal and paid a deposit, refundable if we didn't like the ride. We passed on that.
So I keep asking questions. Please forgive me if it has become annoying, but your responses have been extremely helpful and I am truly grateful.
Thanks,
John
 
I think you would be happiest with the Tom Cat.
Read Kevin Ware's short post on the Bellingham discussion on page 5, I think. He was returning to La Conner and was taking the path of least chop, but was in some pretty rough stuff. He and his wife drove through it, I don't know how fast, and was eventually out of the really rough stuff.
I would PM him for more details on that trip. He will give you the facts and his experienced opinion. A Ranger Tug 25 and a 19 C Dory were also out on Bellingham Bay during that time of winds 21 mph and gusting to 29. They, too, made it through to home.
He knows his boat well, I had a good discussion with him at the NMI factory Saturday on the newest Tom Cat that is being built. Also stopped by his beautiful boat later in the day.
 
Just a comment about those faster V hull boats. They go past me all the time. But then I pass them while they are waiting in line at the fuel dock. They look faster than they really are.

Mark
 
John T":e2rkujkf said:
My question about softness of ride in a head sea was prompted in part by Bob Austin's post at 7:25pm on 8/11 in a discussion under "TomCat." The boat that would allow me to minimize pounding in chop up to 4' would likely be my choice between the Cruiser and TomCat. I was reminded again last Thursday how much my wife truly hates pounding when we took our 22' Cobalt open bow (hard chine V, 20 degree deadrise aft) from Gig Harbor to Seattle to meet our son for lunch. That's a great boat for water sports,I've never owned a cat, though I've driven a 32' Zeta and spent two weeks at a time on my father-in-law's 42' Zeta fishing in the Broughtons. ......
We both find the C-Dory intriguing and appealing as a fairly simple, well laid out, great looking, economical, hopefully comfortable couple's boat for off season use and an easy single hander for getaways for me alone once in awhile. The TomCat offers more spacious accommodations and the benefits of a cat's ride. But that one consideration remains paramount I think: which would most likely be easiest on us when the winds kick up and oppose the current, creating those steep close chop conditions?
It's hard to sell any owner on the idea of taking you out in their boat in lousy conditions, so I haven't tried. .........

So I keep asking questions. Please forgive me if it has become annoying, but your responses have been extremely helpful and I am truly grateful.
Thanks,
John

I'll start my post by quoting a post of mine from April 2011:


Lets just say that I have seen a lot of blue water, and for our bodies, that going over 8 knots in true 2 1/2 foot seas will beat the heck out of you in a C Dory 25. The Tom Cat 255 will do 25 to 30 knots in true 3 foot chop--but much over that, then you are not going to keep that speed up.

I think that 3 to feet is close to the limit --it depends on the period (steepness).
I did cancel one trip, where I would be beating into 3 foot + for a good part of 200 miles. I find the faster we go, the better the boat rides--and when we get to 35 knots the best ride. We did run 14 miles into steep chop from the ICW to our home, with 35 to 50 knots on the nose. But, that is different than conditions in John's waters, where currants can also vary the steepness of the wave. Going into 4 footers, are probably beyond the best ride of the 255. One criticism I have of the boat is that the tunnel clearance is not ideal. In my headily loaded boat, we often had the waterline inside of the tunnel--that disappears as one gets onto a plane, gets an air cushion between the bridge deck aft and the water. Rarely did we ever get any "sneeze"--that it spray from between the tunnels forward. The 255 is a true planing cat.

For the steep 4 foot chop--a displacement/semi displacement cat is better. (I don't think this is much of a difference--in performance, but the bilge on displacement is more rounded.)

I don't have any experience with the Zeta Cats--they have an excellent reputation--but as you know--you cannot compare a beamy deep V type of cat, with a planing cat. The Zeta is sort of a deep V which has been cut down the middle--still has pretty good beam on the hulls, with a relatively narrow, but deep tunnel.

Generally in boats this size, the semi displacement boats are going to do better.
The World Cat or Glacier Bay. There have been more problems with the Glacier bay--and we did not like the layout (2690)--the World cat less issues, but not the layout for us.

The advantage of the semi displacement is also their short comings...They run well with gradual rise in the hull, and keep tunnel clearance as you come up to speed. They do not plane, thus top speed is less. In 2-3 foot chop the Tom Cat, is better--faster, and equal ride.
As you get up to 4 feet--you can keep the tunnel clearance with a decreased speed, and a better ride in the semi-displacement---but there will be more likely more "sneeze". In down wind/beam conditions--the Tom Cat is better, even in the bigger waves--but that means gotten on the back of one and riding it..., not going over. Several of the Glacier Bays have capsized or come apart. Less problems with the World cat--and World cats are still being made.

I agree with you wanting to run in really bad conditions. The second sea trial was with Marc at Wefings--and it was blowing about 30--steep 2 1/2 to 3'. There just happened to be a Regulator 26 going out at exactly the same time. (24* deadrise)
My feeling was that the Tom Cat was better.

My solution--might not be for you, but I sold a Century, with about 20 degree deadrise, and bought a Caracal Cat 18 for the running around, fishing. Its ride is equal to the Tom Cat 255--at least up to 2 1/2' There are two differences from the Tom Cat--1. it is a single engine cat, which (2) tends to ventilate going down wind/seas...this is mitigated by Prop blade choice and engine height.

The forum is for answering questions--our experiences all may vary, and you will often get slightly different opinions...

We sold the Tom Cat only because of health reasons. Wife Marie reminds me every day what a great boat that was...
 
This has been SO HELPFUL! Thank you all. Bob, I always appreciate your observations on hull design and performance characteristics. Patrick, thanks for your referral to the TomCat vs Cruiser discussion; every bit of that spoke to exactly the kinds of things I've been asking. Every boat has its trade-offs, that's for sure. That's why we need a fleet, I like to say, which doesn't always elicit nods of approval! I was initially interested in the 26 Venture, which received some mention in the earlier discussion. However, I ruled it out because a self-bailing cockpit is a high priority. Our boat will be out in the weather all summer and I want rain water to flow overboard, and I want zero to minimal canvas. Thanks again. I love this web site and all of your willingness to share your thoughts in such a positive manner.
John
 
thataway" Generally in boats this size said:
Bob,
Not that I have experience with either, but always had the impression that World Cat and Glacier Bay were quality boats. Maybe I haven't read enough. Any specifics on problems with these boats?

Thanks,

Jake
 
Bob,
Not that I have experience with either, but always had the impression that World Cat and Glacier Bay were quality boats. Maybe I haven't read enough. Any specifics on problems with these boats?

Thanks,

Jake

Jake, they are quality boats. The Glacier bay's have gone from Berring Straits to S. Pacific, and Bermuda, as well as down Islands.

I am not a certified surveyor, but have surveyed several of the GB, WC, and ProCats, Several G B had hull to deck joint shoe box, but held together with screws into 1/2 in some of the 'hidden areas). C Dorys have the hull to deck joint glassed together--the boats I built had the hull to deck glassed together. If I had bought a GB, I would have glassed the hull to deck joint...(Big job if there is a liner).

Both of these did not really have much of a galley or dinette.

I heard that the hull to deck joint failed in one of the GB and ended up with a capsize. The other was well documented--boat was on charter, coming back into some beam/aft heavy seas, snap rolled to one side, the cooler, crew all slide and the boat went over. There are a couple of other reported incidents I don't know as many details of.

The World Cat--the layout was just not for us--OK for overnighting--but not for a month at a time.
 
Thanks for the info Bob. Interesting about the deck to hull joint, certainly could lead to some long term problems.

My interest lies more in a day or overnighter boat so the World Cat has gotten my attention. Agree not the best as a longer term cruiser.

Also, in videos I've seen, the under 9 foot beam models can look a bit tippy from the front in beam seas. Not sure if they really are a bit top heavy or just an illusion. The TC 255 doesn't seem to have that look, maybe due to the low tunnel.

Wish CD made a day boat version with an open cabin and dedicated cockpit seating.
 
Back
Top