This is an interesting discussion. I am in the electronic charting camp, but we always carry paper charts of the areas we cruise in. "Big picture" viewing is easier for us on paper, close in navigating is done with the electronics and eyeballs out the windshield. On our boat, the first mate always has the paper charts on her lap or beside her when we are in new areas. I thought she might really like the ease and convenience of the iPad with electronic charts, but some habits/techniques are not easily converted. :wink:
Of course, the electronic stuff is only as accurate as the chart information. I've heard many folks say, "The GPS is WAY OFF - it shows me on land when we're on the water. I thought it would be more accurate than that." It IS accurate, but the charting data may have come from very dated sources... i.e., the lat/lon is right on, but the positioning on the "chart" isn't.
I whole-heartedly agree that for close-in work, the electronics are better for positioning, BUT it's important to know the direction you are supposed to be heading. For that reason, I don't use our auto-pilot to go from waypoint to waypoint, but use it as an assist in holding course.
As a former pilot, most of my flying was IFR, even in clear weather. Trust the electronics, but have the paper charts available. Same thing with long distance driving: would you go from coast to coast without a map, using only the GPS? I like to have that overview to check that where the GPS is taking me is the best routing for MY needs.
The first mate and I can both plot, but even if set and drift don't vary, navigation is more accurate with electronics. You can be in either camp, but it doesn't hurt to be in BOTH.
Best wishes,
Jim B.