Nikon D60 owners?

flapbreaker

New member
Anyone own one of these cameras? I'm thinking of pulling the trigger soon and was wanting some feedback. Based on the reviews it looks like a nice camera. I'm interested in the VR lenses that come with it otherwise I get a D40.
 
I own a D-40X with the two lenses(not VR). I love it, and , the two Nikon instruction videos were outstanding. The VR would be a help with the 200mm lens. If the price difference is not too great I would go with the 60. I do not know what other goodies the 60 has over the 40.

Fred, Pat, and Mr Grey(the ca

PS What I would love is the 18 to 200 VR Zoom. Maybe someday Santa will like me.
 
Don't have a D60...but I have 3 D70's...love them!...which VR lens are they offering?
For anything Nikon...check kenrockwell.com for reviews...simply type in D60 for his .02....I love that guy!
Do the same for his review of the VR lens....I know he likes the 18-200VR.
 
I skipped the D40 & D60 and went straight to the D80. I love it. Nikon is a great camera and I don't think you'll be disappointed with whatever model you decide on.

I'm sure you've done your home work, but this site:
http://www.dpreview.com/
has some great info regarding camera reviews.

Good luck.
-Randy
 
I have the D40x and the 18-200 VR zoom. I think the combination is excellent, although I still have a little 1 Meg Sony waterproof camera that takes many of my favorite pictures, because often that's what I have with me on the kayak or wherever.

You need to think seriously about whether you want to be carrying and switching two lenses all the time. Everyone's different and you have to decide for yourself. Maybe you've done it in the past.

Personally, it would detract from my day if I had to switch lenses often. I'd skip the combo package with multiple lenses and just buy the camera body and the lens or lenses you really want. For me that's the ultra-zoom for convenience.

I know the gear freaks who read all the specs will tell you about lens design compromises and why a wide range zoom can't be as nearly perfect as other lenses, but the real-world result is that this lens is so much better than what I actually need that any subtleties don't matter. It's easy to use and the VR makes a BIG difference.

If you take low light pictures, consider putting some money into one of their external flash units. The internal one is usable in general, but having lots of light from a big external flash makes a huge difference when the lighting's bad. BIG improvement.

The dpreview website is very useful. If you get a VR lens you'll see it helps a lot, especially with telephotos. Some manufacturers put the VR in the camera to make the lenses less expensive. Nikon puts it in the lens and they can optimize each lens better that way. (It also probably optimizes their profits..... :wink: ) I think the only real addition on the D60 is an ultrasonic mirror cleaning vibration feature. I didn't notice anything else, and I don't know that I've ever had a mirror dirt problem, either.

They make a lot of cameras, but many are quite large. I like the size of the D40 series, personally. Even smaller would be nice, but you start giving up a lot of features and performance.

Jeff
 
I like Nikon. D300, D200 plus a shelf full of older Nikons. The 18-200VR is really worth the price. One lens and no switching problem. Of course Canon is certainly the equal of Nikon -- I've just been a loyal Nikon fan too long. Daughter is a pro photog.(www.sandybyers.com) and uses Canon... lots of family discussion. :lol: :lol:

Dusty
 
Flapbreaker,

Take a look at the Nikkor 80-400 VR lens, too. Between the 18-135 (not a VR darn it) that came with my D80, and the 80-400, the system seems complete enough. If you have any old AI series lenses from the film days, they still mount up and work nicely. You will not have auto focus or any of the program modes, but I still use them. In particular, the 55 micro that I have had for years.

The photo of the Harlan's hawk in my album was taken with the 80-400, hand held. They don't always come out that crisp, but enough do that it keeps me from dragging out the tripod all the time.

I have been watching the Portland Craig's list for Nikon, and have seen some good buys on a number of Nikon digital SLRs. I don't know what kind of shape they are in, but that is a potential source for you.

Regards,

Steve
 
You may want to consider a second battery when using the VR lens. They seem to use a bit more power than the non VR, and you might get caught if you're not close to power.

Steve
 
Canon or Nikon, one might wish to rent a particular lens before shelling out the $$'s. This is also a great option for special purpose lenses, for which an amateur might not use enough to justify the expense of purchasing.

I've been meaning to try this outfit - I've had two semi-pro photographers give me good references on the place.
 
Flap,

Bill makes a very good point about renting lenses. Here in the Portland area you can rent from Pro Photo. They are over in NW. If memory serves me correctly, you can get a Nikkor 600mm VR lens for about $125/day. Smaller lenses should be less expensive. I also think that if you rent for a Saturday, you get Sunday free, but that policy may have changed.

Regardless, it is a great way to try out what you are interested in without shelling out $1500 to $10,000.

Steve
 
Each person's needs are different, but a lot of people, myself included, REALLY like the 18mm end of the range. It's about as wide as you can go without getting into distortion or fisheye lens effects. Very handy indoors, or taking pictures on boats where you can't back up far enough to get the whole scene in (splash :wink ). The 18-200 is a really nice range. In equivalent 35mm film terms, it's like a 27-300 lens.

Jeff
 
Jeff - I agree. Unless you are doing professional architecture, the 18-200 VR is difficult to beat. I have a wide range of Nikon glass and most of it stays home... the 18-200 is my lens of choice. The D40 with 18-200 should be a very good rig. There are times I prefer the D300, but the older I get the less I use it. (or anything else :wink: )

Dusty
 
I have the Nikon D70 and love it. It came with a 35 ~ 75 MM lens that I used until last week. I bought the 18 ~ 200 MM VR lens and have found it to be a very good product. It is a little lighter and a tad shorter than the 35 ~ 70 and the focus is much faster. The VR feature works very well, yesterday I took a string or pictures of a deer while I was walking. They were all in focus and the pictures were sharp.



Mark Toland
 
flapbreaker":283wa2zi said:
Well, I ordered a D40 and the 18-200mm VR lens. Can't wait. It should be worth the premium for the lens just so I don't have to do any switching.

Now doggone it...you're gonna cause me to order one of those 18-200's :lol:
I've wanted one for years...back when they were in short supply and priced at $1200 if you could find one!
Amazon now has them for $679. Pretty easy to justify when it all but erases the need to ever expose the camera to internal dust, and does away with the need for at least 2 lenses.

Hmmmm? anybody wanna buy some Nikon film cameras!?
 
Can that 18-200 mm lens be used for macro worK?

(For those who don't know, macro photography is extreme close up work, like flowers, coins, stamps, etc.)

Joe. :teeth :thup
 
Back
Top