OK, here's a wannabe's first impression . .
"Change" always produces "stress". This is true whether the change is 'good' (new house; marriage; new boat . . . ) or 'bad' (divorce; foreclosure; death in the family). So I have to admit, this move away from the familiar seems a little stressful.
Our ultimate goal (for the present time, at least) would be a 25-C. Given the expense, however, and the very good re-sale value of all the CD's, there seems to be a significant advantage to getting what we can ASAP, and then moving up as it becomes possible. This gets us out on the water sooner rather than later. For a variety of reasons, anything less than '90 CD-22C doesn't seem to feel like the right fit, so that would be a good start. Re-power might be necessary, but that only adds to the value, so the out-of-pocket cost will probably not be too great when the boat is re-sold.
Now, moving to the question at hand.
- Recent articles by several experienced surveyors DEPLORED the existence of liners which literally prevent them from doing their job.
- I'm not sure I agree with the modest percentage of 'interior re-models' described above. I DO find the ABILITY to re-model/revise to be an extremely valuable topic on this site, providing lots of ideas, examples, and techniques for those that choose follow this path.
- Bill and El (and others) have made the point that a LOWER center of gravity for one's feet adds considerably to one's comfort and safety. As a boat rolls from side to side, your motion is minimized (in contrast to sitting 8 feet above the water on as flying bridge, for example). I would assume a modest increase in deck level would not be too much of a factor here, but again, I can't personally attest to this either way.
- Will ANY systems become less accessible? Plumbing? Tanks? Cleat backings? Anchor lockers? WIRING?
- The change will almost certainly (?) be more economical from a production standpoint. Will this ultimately be more profitable?
- Will the result look like the proverbial 'chlorox bottle?'
- Will this change ADD VALUE to the end-result?
- If less desirable, will it decrease demand, and potentially decrease profits?
- The recent helm seat addition (Discovery) looks great. How easy, or hard, would this be with a molded interior?
- Several owner have created a starboard settee in place of (or rather, a modificaton of) the standard table/seat/bunk configuration. Again, looks like a great idea. Still possible? Harder?
- Of most concern (sitting in my living room), would be the ability to install new cleats with SOLID backing, or to upgrade original cleats as desired. Possible? If so, how much more difficult?
Current impressions: I could see the answers to all these questions tipping the balance for me toward a later ('98 - '06) model, rather than buying new from the factory.
Having not seen the proposed changes, it would be unfair (and obviously premature) to 'condemn' this decision. However, a HUGE advantage to the current design is the STARK SIMPLICITY of the underlying platform. Given a solid hull, EVERYTHING can be upgraded over time. "Model years" (with a few notable exceptions) become virtuallay irrelevant. If the proposed changes mean that the 'current factory design' becomes more influential that the 'underlying platform', this may create a fundamental shift in the philosophy behind this boat, and the 'cult following' that has developed around it. (Think Sea-Ray? Think Bayliner?)
Again, "change" is always "stressful". How this will play out remains to be seen.
e.g.