oldgrowth":1q4owy2a said:
...You see I was a school drop out. You noticed I did not say high school because I quit listening to the teachers or applying myself in junior high school, could have been sooner, don’t remember...
...From that time on, everything I know I taught my self or learned by observing...
Well, well, well...ain't that a fine bit 'o confessin' there, Dave. As a fellow non-traditionally educated Brat, let me be the first to applaud you. And I'll also make no apology for the obvious fork in this thread's topic I'm taking, which obviously exists just to raise a few members' post counts...
I've always hated traditional education - school was ALWAYS boring to me. I love to learn, but can't stand somebody else telling me what's important. The whole concept of required courses, whose contents I would either forget in a year and/or never use in my life, are a complete waste of my brain cells. If I want to learn something, I'll do it and do it well. But I have no ambition or desire to study things that don't interest me.
Yup...Da Nerd is also a drop out - high school and college. Actually, I'm not technically a high school drop out, as I took and passed both the GED and California High School proficiency tests when it became clear I wouldn't graduate. Both of which I might add, were about as difficult as figuring out which side of the political spectrum Brock is on. :rainbow
From there, I sputtered about through numerous menial jobs, attending the local JC and two different state colleges over a period of 9 years...getting terrible grades, and never coming close to graduating.
The light for me went on after about two years of taking engineering prep courses, which bored me to tears. I was forcing myself through this program, for lack of finding anything else remotely interesting, and knowing that engineers were in demand and made decent money. That, and it kept my Dad happy...he's a UC Berkeley grad in Civil Engineering, which made acquiring student bucks from the parents a little easier...
While enrolled in a college physics course, the teacher presented a carrot to the class. His offer - a computer programming competition. He wanted interested students to break up into teams of 4-5, and write a PC program that took x and y data points from lab experiments, and determined a formula from the data that could be used for predictive analysis. The prize - a large number of points that would be divided amongst the winning team, and added to their individual test/lab/quiz scores.
Now...when I saw the number of points he was offering, the math jumped out at me. If an individual were to win the prize instead of a team, he/she could flunk every quiz and test, and have sufficient points to get a B in the class. The reason for the high number of points - this was back in the mid 80's, and PC programming was in it's infancy. The coding would be time consuming and complex; I'm sure the teacher assumed only a team effort could complete it, given the amount of free time most science/engineering students had available to them.
I'd just started playing around with computers, was pretty well hooked, and was 100% self-taught - still am. At the time, there were no courses available for PC programming, everything was mainframe or mini computer based. I decided to take the challenge...I virtually ignored the physics curriculum, and was getting D's and F's on all the labs, tests and quizzes. The instructor pulled me aside several times to see what was wrong, and I just shrugged him off. I was spending 8-10 hours a day coding for most of the semester, which was WAY more time than would have been necessary to get a decent grade doing things the "right" way.
The final week of the class, just before finals, 4 teams of students presented their programs. All of them were text based, which was expected - hardly any PC computer programs used graphics at the time, as graphics cards were just starting to make an appearance. There were minor differences between the teams' efforts, but they were all functional and well written. Then...I presented mine, which raised a few eyebrows. Nobody knew I was working on it, including the teacher who had written me off.
Mine started out like the other teams. Data points were entered, and the correct equation was determined and displayed. But along with the correct answer, another option appeared..."Show". When "Show" was selected, the screen of the text-based program flickered for a second, and went into graphics mode, displaying a graph of the equation on the screen with data points overlayed. On this screen, was a "Print" selection, which sent all details including the graph to a dot matrix printer. 'Twas one of the few moments in my life I enjoy bragging about...it felt so good looking at all the dropped jaws, and teams of people that knew their butt's had just been kicked by an individual. I didn't even bother taking the final.
I found my career, I got my B, and the program was still in use at the lab two years after I left. But more importantly, I got educated on something that has stuck with me ever since.
Learning is not about a degree or framed piece of paper, and success is not limited to those who earn one. College is the right path for many, and I don't discount the value of a good traditional education. It's certainly the safer route to success, and the only route for many careers. I'm far from knocking the majority of educated people who take this route, and if Computer Science degrees weren't tied to mainframes when I was in school, I might have been excited about taking that path.
But for me, I'm quite happy with my decision to be a "drop out", and I've done just fine thanks to my studies at the "University of Bill". It's not accredited, and like my traditional schooling I see no end in site, but that's not such a bad thing. :lol:
Whew...I think that counts as about 10 posts.