For many, the choice of a new computer comes down to one primary decision: Windows or Mac. Yet, there is a third option, that while not for everyone, has advantages that will never be matched by a proprietary operating system: Desktop Linux.
Now is a great time to kick the tires. Desktop Linux is advancing at an incredibly rapid pace, and many people are finding themselves with "spare hardware" as they switch from PC to Mac, or upgrade their PC's due to Vista's hefty hardware requirements. One's older PC still has plenty of life left in it. Don't toss it to the curb - download a free OS, and get your hands dirty in the geek's playground.
Enough preaching...let me try and keep this somewhat brief, and get folks curious about Desktop Linux pointed in the right direction.
In my mind, there are only two choices for Desktop Linux: Ubuntu or OpenSUSE. And between these two, I tend to recommend Ubuntu for new users, even though I prefer and use OpenSUSE.
Reason being: Support. The Ubuntu community expects rank amateurs with Linux, and has a support structure that most folks new to Linux are comfortable with. Their forums are well laid out, very complete, and have an excellent reputation for resolving issues quickly.
OpenSUSE has a decent support structure, but it's a bit more spread out. My primary reason for using OpenSUSE is due to familiarity; we use SUSE Enterprise distributions on our servers at work, and I find myself "under the hood" quite frequently, away from the point and click of a GUI desktop. In this environment, Linux distributions each have their own personality; I'm just more comfortable with those that are SUSE based. I've also noticed OpenSUSE is a bit snappier than Ubuntu on the same hardware, but it's not a huge difference.
Regardless of which distribution you choose, there are several issues that many new Linux users encounter.
Hardware Support
Modern Linux hardware support is excellent, and for older hardware, it's actually much more complete than Windows. But there are a few hurdles that many encounter. Perhaps the two most common: video and wireless.
Your older video card is probably supported just fine, but if you have a newer card with more advanced graphics, you may be quite disappointed when your fancy new Linux desktop is presented to you. If video is jerky and sluggish, it's probably a driver issue. Many modern video card manufacturers do not release specs for their hardware. This forces you to use their proprietary drivers if you want decent performance, which are not included with Desktop Linux distributions. If you find yourself in this situation, use the support forums above to learn how to acquire and install these drivers. The two most notable video card/chip manufacturers where this problem exists: nVidia and ATI.
Also, related to video - most folks will want to fetch and install the Microsoft Web fonts, as they are so widely used and are of a pretty high quality. Before you complain that your Internet surfing is ugly, do a little research and figure out how to install these - it makes a big difference in appearance.
RE wireless cards - this issue is not as prevalent as the video card issue, but the problem can be far more frustrating. Reason being, you end up with a laptop with Desktop Linux on it, that can't get online. And the only way to fix it, is to get online. :lol:
When this happens, you need to resort to a backup PC to fetch appropriate drivers and installation instructions. Again, while most wireless cards will be recognized and work just fine after installation of the Linux OS, those that don't are due to the proprietary nature of many wireless card manufacturers. Broadcom is perhaps the most notorious, but there are others.
Desktop Environment - Gnome or KDE
In the Linux Desktop world, the debate between Gnome and KDE takes on every bit as much enthusiasm as the Mac vs. PC wars. Without getting into all the gory tech details, Gnome and KDE determine how your desktop looks, and how you interact with it.
I'm not going to suggest which one is "better" - but I use Gnome, which is the default desktop on both Ubuntu and OpenSUSE now. I think it's safe to say, that Gnome presents a simpler interface, which is of benefit for somebody new to Linux. Once the shock of your non-Windows, non-Mac world dissipates - give both KDE and Gnome a shot, and pick for yourself.
Desktop Linux is an absolutely huge topic, but hopefully the above will get any of you curious about it a head start.
Now is a great time to kick the tires. Desktop Linux is advancing at an incredibly rapid pace, and many people are finding themselves with "spare hardware" as they switch from PC to Mac, or upgrade their PC's due to Vista's hefty hardware requirements. One's older PC still has plenty of life left in it. Don't toss it to the curb - download a free OS, and get your hands dirty in the geek's playground.
Enough preaching...let me try and keep this somewhat brief, and get folks curious about Desktop Linux pointed in the right direction.
In my mind, there are only two choices for Desktop Linux: Ubuntu or OpenSUSE. And between these two, I tend to recommend Ubuntu for new users, even though I prefer and use OpenSUSE.
Reason being: Support. The Ubuntu community expects rank amateurs with Linux, and has a support structure that most folks new to Linux are comfortable with. Their forums are well laid out, very complete, and have an excellent reputation for resolving issues quickly.
OpenSUSE has a decent support structure, but it's a bit more spread out. My primary reason for using OpenSUSE is due to familiarity; we use SUSE Enterprise distributions on our servers at work, and I find myself "under the hood" quite frequently, away from the point and click of a GUI desktop. In this environment, Linux distributions each have their own personality; I'm just more comfortable with those that are SUSE based. I've also noticed OpenSUSE is a bit snappier than Ubuntu on the same hardware, but it's not a huge difference.
Regardless of which distribution you choose, there are several issues that many new Linux users encounter.
Hardware Support
Modern Linux hardware support is excellent, and for older hardware, it's actually much more complete than Windows. But there are a few hurdles that many encounter. Perhaps the two most common: video and wireless.
Your older video card is probably supported just fine, but if you have a newer card with more advanced graphics, you may be quite disappointed when your fancy new Linux desktop is presented to you. If video is jerky and sluggish, it's probably a driver issue. Many modern video card manufacturers do not release specs for their hardware. This forces you to use their proprietary drivers if you want decent performance, which are not included with Desktop Linux distributions. If you find yourself in this situation, use the support forums above to learn how to acquire and install these drivers. The two most notable video card/chip manufacturers where this problem exists: nVidia and ATI.
Also, related to video - most folks will want to fetch and install the Microsoft Web fonts, as they are so widely used and are of a pretty high quality. Before you complain that your Internet surfing is ugly, do a little research and figure out how to install these - it makes a big difference in appearance.
RE wireless cards - this issue is not as prevalent as the video card issue, but the problem can be far more frustrating. Reason being, you end up with a laptop with Desktop Linux on it, that can't get online. And the only way to fix it, is to get online. :lol:
When this happens, you need to resort to a backup PC to fetch appropriate drivers and installation instructions. Again, while most wireless cards will be recognized and work just fine after installation of the Linux OS, those that don't are due to the proprietary nature of many wireless card manufacturers. Broadcom is perhaps the most notorious, but there are others.
Desktop Environment - Gnome or KDE
In the Linux Desktop world, the debate between Gnome and KDE takes on every bit as much enthusiasm as the Mac vs. PC wars. Without getting into all the gory tech details, Gnome and KDE determine how your desktop looks, and how you interact with it.
I'm not going to suggest which one is "better" - but I use Gnome, which is the default desktop on both Ubuntu and OpenSUSE now. I think it's safe to say, that Gnome presents a simpler interface, which is of benefit for somebody new to Linux. Once the shock of your non-Windows, non-Mac world dissipates - give both KDE and Gnome a shot, and pick for yourself.
Desktop Linux is an absolutely huge topic, but hopefully the above will get any of you curious about it a head start.