Catastrophic failure of Honda BF150

smckean (Tosca)

New member
I guess I'm the unlucky one. Within 2 days of having my 2005 CD25 Cruiser christened as "Tosca" at the May Friday Harbor gathering; and after owning the boat for a little more than a year; and after putting a mere 100 hours on the engine that already had a 1000 hours on it; and after spending $2000 on a major tune up and chain case replacement just 40 engine hours ago; my Honda 150 engine destroyed itself!

My main interest at this point is whether or not anyone else, who has a Honda, has had this experienced. According to the Honda authorized mechanic, the thrust bearings (I think that's what he called them) that the vertical crank shaft sits on failed. Apparently, this is a known problem with Honda 150s (and perhaps other Hondas). The 150 is essentially a Camray engine turned vertically; given this vertical orientation, these thrust bearings were added to support the crank shaft. My choices are to re-power the boat, or save the lower end by replacing the powerhead. Both are very expensive options.

Briefly, here's what happened. I was heading home to Guemes from Sucia, cruising along at 4400 RPM (what I consider to be the "sweet spot" when I want to go relatively fast), on perfectly calm water, in clear bright sunshine, with no debris in the water, when the engine suddenly lost power and a loud clunk noise came from the engine. The engine ran after that, but with a mild banging noise as long as I kept the RPMs below 2000 (above 2000 RPM the noise got quite loud). Luckily, I got to my destination in that condition. A couple of weeks later, I motored over to Cap Sante Marine to get a diagnosis -- a trip of only 4 or 5 miles. On the way, another loud clunk was heard, and after that the engine sounded as if it were a bag of tin cans being shaken. I barely made it into the harbor.

The mechanic told me that a few of these Hondas do this. Indeed, when I told him my story while still in his office, this crank shaft thrust bearing issue was his first guess among 2 or 3 other possibilities. He said it would be pretty easy to tell. Once on the boat, he looked carefully for any telltale oil leaks or other evidence under the cowling. He then listened to the engine at various locations with a modified stethoscope. Then came the ultimate test of his guess; he put a small pry bar under the pulley that is attached to the crank shaft just under the easily removed cover at the top of the engine. The pully moved slightly under pressure. He looked at me and said: "Not good!" He applied more pressure, and the shaft moved 1/2". "That's it.", he said, "The powerhead will have to be replaced." He said that a properly experienced person with the right tools could re-build the engine for $2000-3000 in parts; but for the average consumer (definitely me :wink:), a replacement powerhead from new parts from the factory would be my cheapest option (about $10,000). I'm looking at that, or a brand new engine (which would be at least double that).

The mechanic told me that he had seen several Hondas fail in this way; the vast majority don't, but some do. I asked if there was a pattern (poor maintenance, hard running, etc), he said no -- it seems to be the luck of the draw. I asked if the engine might have been saved had I not run it home. He said no that the damage had no doubt happened well before that. (And indeed when I got home, with his suggestion, I looked at the old chain case that I saved from the major maintenance done just 40 engine hours previous; it showed the telltale scrape marks from that pully moving up and down once the thrust bearing began to fail.)

Anyone else had anything similar to this happen??
 
smckean (Tosca)":23a2qulq said:
I guess I'm the unlucky one.

<Some deletions>

Anyone else had anything similar to this happen??

Sorry to hear of your plight! A definite catastrophe!

I've not heard of a similar problem here on the C-Brats, IIRC.

If it were me, and within my budget, I'd choose to replace the Honda with a new Suzuki 150 or the 175, if you need the extra 25 hp and want to pay for it and the variable valve timing).

Dr. Bob will have an opinion on this choice, I'm sure. He prefers the Suzi's in this power range, IIRC.

Joe. :teeth :thup
 
I would not consider a Honda Marine Outboard. I love Honda cars, generators, motorcycles and their small air cooled industrial engines. I've owned a number of each. In Florida where the boating season is traditionally seen as the longest. Yamaha's seem to be the engine of choice. There have been a number of issues with relatively low hours Hondas, mostly related corrosion. Given what you mechanic says, I think you would be crazy to buy another Honda marine engine. Ask Marc from Wefing's. He will say the Honda's are heavier and slower and have corrosion issues. Which even worse in Florida compared to the northwest. A Yamaha 150 has a pretty good track record, that is what I would consider.
D.D.
 
OUCH. Sorry to hear about this issue and I hope you find a good resolution.

Is $20,000 really the all-up cost for a new engine?
 
That is terrible to hear but there are lots of engine options out there for you. I think many of us wonder when our unlucky time will come or if our power will just slowly age out and not force the decision. Glad you were able to still run it enough to get back to port.

From my experience with the 25 I would go up to the 175-200hp range if you replace the unit. That hull can use the extra push especially when loaded up for cruising.

Greg
 
One of the reasons I read" The Hull Truth" forum is to keep up to date on hull failures and outboard motor failures. The Honda 150 Thrust bearing issue is well know. But there are Hondas 150's which have gotten 8,000 hours and still running. (Most of these very high hour motors are in Law enforcement, Coast Guard, or commercial fisherman where there is a high percent to time at low speeds, and very frequent service.

The Yamaha 150's have had some exhaust corrosion issues, which have destroyed a few engines. There may be a law suit about this issue.

ETEC's have some problems--seem more random, but failure on low hour motors occur.

Mercury--some swear by them, some swear at them…they have their dedicated owners. I have only owned one during my life. It ran fine.

Suzuki, especially in the higher HP motors has had rare issues. One of the advantages to me is the higher ratio in the gear case, and larger prop diameter, which allows more aggressive props. I have had 2 Suziki 150's and currently own a 140. No problems, with any of them. But I have owned a lot of motors thru the years, and rarely had an issue.

Suzuki's biggest issue is a small number of dealers, and perhaps slightly more difficult to get parts due to fewer dealers. However, I have 2 Suzuki dealers within 25 miles of my home in Pensacola.

It sounds as if the problem with the thrust washer, in hind site, was evident when you replaced the chain case. When I first read that, it sent off alarm bells about the thrust bearing. It would have still meant an engine tear down, but we would never know what the difference in cost might have been.

The bottom line is that I think you had the bad luck of the draw. Sure there must be some tolerance difference, or minor defect in the thrust bearing which fails. But I don't know of anyone who has determined what that is.

I would go with a Suzuki 150 or 175 (same engines--just higher HP art higher RPM). But the Suzuki will require re-rigging, and thus cost more. If the new power head was 50% of the cost of a new motor, then I would go with the new power head. However, it it is 75% then I would go with the new motor. There may be some salvage value in the lower unit. I recollect somewhere reading that some one wanted a lower unit for a Honda 150--and it may have been due to corrosion issues (which certainly do exist).
 
Tosca,
Sorry about your Honda 150, which is by most all accounts is a well engineered, well built engine.
I can't help but extrapolate to the the human machine, which is engineered and built even better, with amazing self-healing qualities to boot. But folks can still have a stroke at age 4, a heart attack at age 12, or not be able to move after age 2, or die at age 1 for no fathomable reason.
My advice is say, oh well, Bad Luck here, but at least the Bad Luck is affecting one of my machines and NOT ME!
Because if REALLY Bad Luck strikes you (or me), no one may able to fix it, and $20,000 could be just a 0.01% down payment on the cost, excluding funeral arrangements.
I must be in a sorry mood today, SORRY!
Stay Positive, but not so much so that you cause galvanic corrosion on your boat.
Cheers!
John
 
I don't know how this would work, but looking at other forums on Honda thrust bearing failures Honda seems to have picked up the tab, or at least some of it, for failed thrust bearings. You can call Honda service and discuss the problem and see what they'd do.

I know it's no satisfaction, but the problem seems more common on the 225. It seems that allowing oil pressure to build up before gassing it is the best way to go.

Boris
 
Good grief, Sandy, this is terrible. Since your boat and mine have the same engine, serial numbers probably within a few digits of each other, I wonder might be in store for us...
 
That is awful news! Check out new motors on www.boats.net and you'll see prices quite a bit less than quoted.
If it were me, I would go Yamaha. Great motors and wide dealer service network all over the place. Now, I have to worry about our Honda 150. At least I have a kicker to get home on.
Good Luck on repower and let us all know how it goes.
 
tHE $10,000 quote for a rebuild is crazy money . Down here in SW florida you can buy a new 150hp for $10-12k brand new (suzuki, mercury , yamaha is a little more ) It seems you guys in the PNW get raped on trailers and engines price wise . Good Luck in your search . Call around and price out new motors Honda's are the most expensive but seem to be plentiful up in PNW compared to SW florida . Jim
 
At the Seattle Boat Show I talked with one of the Everett engine dealers. He was willing to discuss prices, and replacement of my 90 horse was a lot less than I had been hearing from sights online.

ps - I was curious, and likely not ever to be in need of that replacement.
 
I Googled Suzuki outboard engine corrosion problems. Lots of activity there. Below was a quote from a posting on the Hull Truth.

A friend who is in the boating business in South Africa said that both Suzuki and Honda have a bad reputation there for corrosion. The only engine he likes is Yamaha. I really have enjoyed the performance of the Suzuki motors until this, but this shocks and angers me. The motors cost $5,000 a piece, they are in great shape internally (I have kept excellent care of them), but now they are probably going to be worthless in a couple more years.

D.D.
 
Thanks one and all for your concern and suggestions. I thought it would conserve everyone's time if I reply to all current posts with a single reply. Here goes:

brevity":s2ay8c5e said:
Is $20,000 really the all-up cost for a new engine?
Well, yes and no. I've only got firm all inclusive prices from the one boat yard where the boat is now on stilts on land. The prices include everything: cost of the engine, labor, supporting equipment (controls etc), and tax. The new engines all-in costs seems to be even higher actually....more like $25,000. I have requests in from other boat yards to see what the variability is.

Aurelia":s2ay8c5e said:
From my experience with the 25 I would go up to the 175-200hp range if you replace the unit.
Yes. Since I've had the boat, I've always felt that I wished for more power (especially when going up on plane). I tend to cruise for multiple days with lots of creature comforts and gizmos...so I'm heavy. As I understand it, back in 2005 when this boat was purchased new, engines above 150HP were considered to be too heavy to put on this already stern-heavy boat (at least with Hondas). That is no longer true today. Indeed, I can put on a new Yamaha 200 for a mere 4 pounds of additional weight! If I go new, I'm going with 200HP.

thataway":s2ay8c5e said:
It sounds as if the problem with the thrust washer, in hind site, was evident when you replaced the chain case. When I first read that, it sent off alarm bells about the thrust bearing. It would have still meant an engine tear down, but we would never know what the difference in cost might have been.
You may have hit the nail on the head. The old chain case (which I kept) has the telltale scrape marks on it. It's possible all this happened in the last 100 engine hours while I've owned the boat, but more likely I think, the problem had already started before that. Had I been smart enough to have had the engine surveyed before I bought the boat, the problem might have been discovered then (it is very simple to test for, and given that trust bearing failure is a known problem with these engines, there is little doubt the mechanic doing the survey would have found the problem). Furthermore, as you point out, I am definitely bothered that EQ Marine did not even look at the removed chain case. The scoring is very clear on the old chain case, and the mechanic should have told me about it before I spent the now totally wasted $2000 on the major tune up and chain case replacement.

As far as your manufacturer recommendations go....at the moment I am leaning toward a Yamaha 200. Somehow given all I've seen and read, the Yamaha appeals to me. I plan in future years to spend time in Canada (and a dream to one day circumnavigate the Queen Charlotte Islands). As I understand it, Yamahas have the best service network in Canada.

gulfcoast john":s2ay8c5e said:
Stay Positive, but not so much so that you cause galvanic corrosion on your boat.
Thanks, John, for your interesting comments. They put a smile on my face.

Pat Anderson":s2ay8c5e said:
Good grief, Sandy, this is terrible. Since your boat and mine have the same engine, serial numbers probably within a few digits of each other, I wonder might be in store for us...
Indeed! I thought of you when this happened! OTOH, everyone seems to be saying that having this happen is a crap shoot. Some engines do it, some don't. Maybe you're the lucky one to balance me the unlucky one :).

Salmon Fisher":s2ay8c5e said:
That is awful news! Check out new motors on www.boats.net and you'll see prices quite a bit less than quoted.
Thanks for the link. I've checked it out and best I can tell, these prices are $2000-3000 cheaper in terms of base price of the engine. The prices I'm looking at are all-in prices (including even tax). I have little doubt there may be some negotiating room in the prices I've been given, but I don't think much. It may be that once you pay shipping, other hardware such as the digital controls or whatever, the price may not be so far apart.

jennykatz":s2ay8c5e said:
tHE $10,000 quote for a rebuild is crazy money
Note that the replacement of the powerhead price is not a rebuilt engine, but for the installation of a brand new factory powerhead. The $10,000 includes labor, tax, you name it. Perhaps that explains the difference. I am checking around on pricing, but so far, I don't see a lot of variability in prices.
 
So sorry to hear of your engine problems Tosca. That's a lot of $$ to repair and I don't wish that on anybody.

Regarding the Suzuki corrosion issues, the problem I'm most familiar with has been well documented. The issue I'm referring to is the engine holder plug-dissimilar metal problem for 90-140Hp motors from 1999-2008. Luckily our DF90 escaped this corrosion issue, most likely due to being stored inside at Twin Bridges. I was able to change out the plug successfully with no signs of corosive damage. The motors have since been redesigned to do away with those plugs.

There have been well documented corrosion issues with Yamaha's as well so I'm not sure there's any outboard manufacturer that hasn't had one issue or another. All of the modern outboard motors are pretty reliable now. As others have said, it's the luck of the draw or in your case just bad luck. I hope you fine an acceptable and affordable resolution.
 
...looking at other forums on Honda thrust bearing failures Honda seems to have picked up the tab, or at least some of it, for failed thrust bearings. You can call Honda service and discuss the problem and see what they'd do.

My father always said "What's the worst they can say? No?" No harm in inquiring and following up on this. Some time invested but even if they pay part of the repair. I'd speak to them and follow up w/ it in writing.

This really, really sucks. I feel for you as I've had catastrophic engine issues on air cooled VWs I've had. One "dropped a valve" which destroyed the entire half of one of my engines, leaving me stuck on the freeway and about $2,500.00 poorer.

Most bearing failures are due to lack of lubrication, hence I never "rev" engines that are newly started/cold. You are correct in the engine is merely an Accord engine, on end. The once horizontal loads now become vertical and without a clutch, the thrust bearing replaces the throw out bearing. Still would like to know what Honda engineers realized & when and if it was a design/engineering error/flaw or a random issue as you've said. :?
 
Well, here's my current plan.........

After doing significant research and talking to boat-knowledgable friends, I've decided to repower in spite of the expense ($25,000 all inclusive cost, even sales tax -- I have negotiated a $17,000 price for the new engine alone). Frankly, I just want what I want :wink:, and I want a new engine......my engine.....the one I will know from its 1st day to its last.

Next was: which engine. I looked at Honda, Mercs, and Yamaha, and have decided to go with the Yamaha F200XCA. There were many reasons for this choice. There were many positives for the other choices too, but the F200XCA seemed to fit my needs/wants the best. In particular, if I'm going to repower, I wanted 200HP, but with no extra weigh on the stern: the F200XCA is perfect for that since it only weighs an additional 4 pounds over my previous Honda BF150. Next, I've become intrigued by digital controls. The F200XCA is one of the few (only?) 200HP that offers this option. Last, I like the fact that Yamaha has the most extensive service network in Canada and Alaska. Living only 30 miles from the British Columbia inland waterways, I plan to spend significant time in BC (Gulf Islands, Broughtons, etc).

Any comments on the engine, the controls, the plan, the cost.....anything, please.
 
Back
Top