25 Tug questions...answered!

I just posted a huge reply and lost it somehow. Hope this abbreviated answer helps...

Noise level is fine. The boat is surprisingly quiet at idle.

The exhaust is vented aft near the waterline. i guess with a following wind, but that is true of any boat.

The engine will go forever at any speed, but if going slow the manual suggests to run it up. This can be done in neutral, no need to speed up the boat.

I don't see an easy way to mount a kicker. Easier to tow a bucket/ parachute contraption.

I don't think the aft spaces would be good for trolling. Too shallow and too close to the battery compartment.

Dingy and raft would fit well on the swim platform.

The 6 gal hot water is a combo heater / storage.

The price does not include trailer. A custom trailer is still being built, but at around 6,000 lbs, it seems like it will tow nicely.

The mast can not be modified to handle weight. It is a clever set up to fold easily. If you need it to support weight the folding option will be sacrificed.

I think the anchor roller could self launch with the right anchor, but it does not articulate as it is now.

The anchor locker can not be accessed from inside the boat. There is a door on the port side of the windlass, flush with the deck.

Raymarine C-120 has radar.

The canvas has the stainless steel frame included. i'll send some pictures to see if it seems worth it. It sure looks nice.

Off to the Newport Show. Tickets are the same, say you are with C-Dory or C-Ranger.
Hope to see you there!

Fair winds...
 
I've been waiting a long time to post on the Brats here about the C-Ranger 25. I've spent a fair amount of time around the boats and have had the opportunity to run one in Puget Sound. I do have a lot of experience with boats of this type and I have a farily extensive knowledge of yacht design having intended to go into that field many years ago. The following comments are based on computations using known and accepted formula in the yacht design profession so if you have an argument with my assessment make it on the basis of how the math works using accepted criteria.

There are lots of pieces of the puzzle but two of the main items are weight and waterline length. Neither of these figures are published so I'll have to use what I've learned of the boat for weight and take an educated guess on the waterline length. Also note that all the formulae used in yacht design are computed in knots; mph are for ski boats, bass boats, and cars...true cruisers operate in knots (after all that's what the 'miles' are on charts).

From the waterline length we can derive the square root of that number which a key ingredient in many computations. We'll use 24-feet since the overall length is listed as 24'7" and the tansom does angle back just a little. The square root of 24 is 4.9 (rounded off). For the sake of making this easy we'll just round up to 5.

The hull speed of a boat is generally considered to be 1.34 times the square root of the waterline length (5 in our case) which is called the speed-length ratio. In this case 1.34 times 5 gives our hull a speed of 6.7 knots. Beyond this speed we start to venture into semi-displacement speeds which is generally considered to be from hull speed (S/L of 1.34) to about a speed-length ratio of 2.5 to 3 (the former for light flatter boat the latter for heavy deep-v hulls). Beyond a S/L (speed-length ratio) of 3 the boat is definitely on a full plane. For the C-Ranger 25 that means semi-planning speeds start at 6.7 knots and extend to about 13.5 knots (2.7 S/L); at an S/L of 3, which is 15 knots, the boat should be on a full natural plane.

For this type of hull it requires about one horsepower for every 80 pounds of boat weight to achieve approximately 15 knots. Taking into account the empty weight of the boat, electronics and accessory add-ons, full fuel, full water, safety gear, personal gear, a dinghy, cruising supplies and a couple of folks we're likely in the 9,000 pound range. That means to move the boat at 15 knots we need 112 horsepower (9,000 pounds divided by 80 pounds-per-horsepower). This is in CALM water; powering into a headwind or seas will require more (sometimes much more) horsepower. The Yanmar 125 can put out a continuous 116hp at 3700 rpm; you can see with any appreciable wind or sea state crusing at 15 knots is not going to be achievable quite often and only at the max the engine can put out which is not something most of us want to do. The fuel burn at 3700 rpm is a bit over 6 gallons-per-hour which yields in CALM conditons about 2.35 nautical miles-per-gallon.

A note on weight...the information I recieved on the first CR25 was that it weighed 8500 pounds with fluids (not including the trailer). The first hulls are usually heavier because so much work is done by hand and the production hulls should be a bit lighter. Subtracting fuel and water weight and the equipment hull #1 had (anchor and rode, Raymarine E-120 with radar, etc) the empty weight of the boat was about 7500 pounds. Assuming they can trim that back to say 7,000 pounds we'll add about 1,000 pounds for liquids, electronics, safety gear, dinghy, and such bringing us to 8,000 pounds. We then need to add the weight of personal gear, galley gear, food, and folks (and accessories like a microwave, generator, etc). I suspect in the water with the crew aboard this will put most CR25's in the 9,000 pound range. Remember for every 80 pounds you put aboard the boat it requires one more horsepower to push the boat at 15 knots.

For comparison, 19 knots (about 22 mph) would require that the horsepower-to-weight ratio be down to 65 pounds-per-horspower. To achieve this on the C-Ranger 25 with the Yanmar 125 means the fully loaded boat (with the crew aboard) could weigh no more than 8,100 pounds; that's a tough number to hit on a CR25 loaded for cruising although it's possbile for a very light new boat. At 9,000 pounds it would require 140 horspower to achieve the same 19-knot speed.

The two most important items that are overlooked with regard to performance are weight (especially on planning hulls) and sea state. The higher speed you wish to attain the lower the weight has to be per horsepower (all the way down to about 28 pounds-per-horsepower at 30 knots). Wind and rough conditions require a lot more horsepower than folks normally allow for.

Speeds for boats like this are very difficult to report accurately without totally controlled circumstances. Any change in sea conditions, wind, weight, trim or current will skew the results and small changes yield big percentage changes at the speeds we're discussing here. For instance, it isn't unusual at all to have 2 or 3 knots of current here in Puget Sound. If the boat is acutally running at 12 knots through the water then the reported speed running with the current will be (with a 2 knot current) 14 knots; the opposite direction will only yield 10 knots. That's a 4 knot difference...about a 33% percent difference in reported speed at 12 knots. If you then add wind (even 8 to 10 knots makes a big difference) things get skewed even more.

There is no indication that this is anything other that a full planning hull and the design has not been optimized for semi-planning speeds; which means, like most boats, it's not particularly happy "in between". Since it carries a moderate "V" at the stern it does not drop the stern as much at slower than planning speeds as a deep-v hull does but it's still not the best running attitude. I found the boat delightful at 7.5 knots (burning 1.3 gph) with the bow slightly up and a bit of lift in the stern stabilizing the boat. At 8 knots the bow was rising too high for good visibility and was starting to climb the bow wave (as all boats will). I wasn't happy with the running attitude again until approximately 12.5 knots when the bow started to drop on it's own; prior to that it took a lot of trim tab to level things out. In a two-way run done twice I was able to achieve 13 knots (or just a shade over) at wide open throttle with the Yanmar 125 installed in the boat I was testing. I wasn't able to achieve full rated rpm as the prop wasn't correct and they were still dialing that in with additional testing planned.

I'm very happy with the boat's physical properties; they've done a superb job with space utilization and there a real "sense of space" inside the cabin. Real people can move around and access things easily. The hull runs as I expected it to; it tracks much better than most at modest speeds (my favorite 7.5 knot speed) and it appears when given sufficient power it will run nicely in the upper teens at a fast cruise though I've yet to test it there. My sense was at 13 knots we were just getting to the point where the hull was starting to flatten out on its own; I think another couple of knots would have done the trick. Most of us won't want to run the 125 as hard as it's necessary to do to obtain a 15-knot cruise and extra weight, wind or sea state will leave you shy of that mark with the engine spinning at 3700 rpm at its max continuous horsepower.

dtaol wrote: (My comments are below his marked >>)

Here are some additional questions.

1. How about the noise level outside and inside of the cabin at different speeds?

>> The first boat was reasonable but not quiet and more and better insulation has been added.

2. Smell. Does the exaust follow the boat around at slow speeds?

>> This wasn't noticeable on my seatrial; the engine exhausts on the side and not under the swim step and I suspect this helps.

3. Will the deisel engine operate at trolling speeds of less than 2mph and at length?

>> There is too much thrust from the prop and I believe the lowest speed will be about 3 knots though that's a very hard number to measure for in moving water.

4. Can you mount a kicker on the back some place? What kind of modifications to the hull would it take?

>> None to the hull; there's a very robust full-width swim step mounted on the transom. It will probably require a mount attached to the swim step.

5. Would the two floor storage compartments work as fish boxes, and could they be insulated and fitted with macerator pumps ala TC-255?

>> Both of the hatches in the hulls I've viewed gave access to things like batteries, water heater, etc; you wouldn't want to make these areas inaccessible.

6. Where could a dingy or raft be carried?

>> The only logical place if not deflated and rolled up is on the swim platform.

7. The standard features list indicates that there is a 6 gal hot water tank, but, doesn't say anything about a hot water heater. Is that included?

>> One and the same.

8. Does the $110K base cost include a trailer?

>> No.

9. How easily does it trailer and pull for long distances?

>> I don't have any direct experience with this yet but the CR25 doesn't require a special trailer. With the weight forward of the transom over the trailer axles it should tow quite well. I've a lot of experience towing boats like the Orca 24, SeaSports, Grady-Whites and such; this boat shouldn't be much different. It will launch and retrieve a lot easier than the typical deep-v hull. All up trailering weight should be in the 10,000 pound range (assuming full liquids).

10. Can the mast be used or modified to be used with a windlass to pull pots and launch and retrieve the dink?

>> No. Although a full custom mast could be designed as the mast offered with the CR25 is optional. The dinghy needs to go on the stern; there isn't room on the cabin top and using a davit lift on a small rolling boat to lift a dinghy is precarious at best.

11. Is the anchor roller a good one which would self deploy the anchor or will it have to be upgraded.

>> It's a good one. The windlass is set up nicely on the CR25.

12. Where is the Anchor locker? I haven't been able to pick it out of the available photos. Is it big enough to make retrieving the anchor a one person operation and not make mess out of the "state room"?

It's right at the bow next to the windlass; no mess in the forward berth area.

13. Does the Raymarine Navigation package include radar?

>> It's an option and so far they've indicated that the dealers will install the dome.

14. Is the cockpit canvas and side windows fairly priced at $2500 and as good in terms of quality and eficiency as other custom work you have seen on other boats?

>> I would consider the price to be fair here at our location given that I can have full custom canvas done at that price with high quality fittings and a great fit. I haven't seen the canvas offered through the factory.
 
Les,
Excellent summary, and certainly is entirely consistant with my own background and training's predictions!

Sounds like an excellent pocket/trailerable cruiser, but to get the higher speeds you have to go even higher HP--which is very much the same as in one of its competitors the semidisplacement Rosborough 246--To get the higher speeds these boats are using a 160 hp diesel, or high hp outboards.

Your point about weight is extremely valid and very important in any of these smaller cruising boats.

You make an excellent point about knots vs MPH. Unfortunately many of the boats in this size range magazine tests (which are typically very light boats) are in MPH, and that has to be always kept in mind!

The one feature which this boat has over many of the other small pocket cruisers, is that it can travel at over 10 knots when necessary. I have commented several times in the past, that for coastal cruising along the US coasts there are a number of runs, which can be done without an overnight passage, if you have the capability of 10 knots.

Thank you!

Bob Austin
 
Les – Thank You for an easy to understand explanation on hull design and speed. I am sure you cleared up a lot of questions about the CR-25.

I will use your formula with different speeds on my 16 so I can better understand it.
 
Les

Thanks so much for your insightful post. This seems to be a watershed event. Seems its time for some reality to set in.

It appears that ,since the Yanmar 110 is the largest engine to be offered, this boat will be underpowered for the expected weight. It sounds from your description that this boat, even with the 125 can't get up on full plane and will only be effecient at slow cruise speeds.

Is it time for C-Dory/Ranger to rethink the engine options????

The loaded weight you describe is way different than the <5000lb that others have reported.

I may be wrong but I think a small raft might be mounted in the rear of the cabin on the top or a rack could be fitted to support it. Sure would be a nuisence having it mounted on the stern for fishing or for those sitting outside having to look at it during a nice sunset cruise.
 
I haven't seen one of these boats, but I also agree that a rack could be made for an inflatable rolled up--or even a rack over the cockpit, for a full inflatable. Any number of davits could lift it up there, including the manual Garhauer block and tackle davit. Another way, would be a hard top or SS frame over the cockpit (more weight!)---and a roller aft to pull the dinghy up onto the top from the stern. We used such a scheme for a RIB--like the pull boat on a purse seiner over a roller--lots of ways to skin a...dinghy!

I find one of the best books to read about hulls is David Gerr's "The Nature of Boats"--he has also written "The propeller Handbook". David Gerr is a very good Naval Architect and covers boats which have forms like the C Dory--which many other books ignore.

Also there are some hull forms which can be relitatively easily driven over the 1.34x sq rt LWL, but these are usually long and narrow or have some unusual underwater features, with a narrow beam waterline. For example catmarans don't follow the rules well. (Tom Cat is sort of the exception as a planing cat)
 
I think another thing that could help the over the top dingy storage issue is to get rid of the fake smoke stack. Really unnecessary on such a small boat where square inches make a difference.

I actually stopped at the dealer's today about this boat. We are getting serious about upgrading for retirement. However, This boat may not have been designed to double as a fishing boat. There needs to be some reasonable speed to get to and from the fishing holes economically. I'm not talking about the raging speed of the TC with 300 horses. But, I am saying that it doesn't make much sense to be limited to 13 knots at 2.5 mpg when you could be travelling at 30 knots at 2.5mpg.

Skinning the kicker is another challenge. It is really needed for fishing and just in case.

from Anchorage our summer would go like this, and does except for the Haines part:

May/June - Some fishing for chinook and halibut in Cook Inlet, cruise in Cook Inlet, Cruise Prince William Sound from Whittier.

Late June/Early July, Drive to Haines and cruise in the South East Waters or some other adventure.

Mid July/August - Fish, Fish, Fish, silvers and halibut out of Sewerd. This is when we have all the summer visitors from the lower 48 and they want to fish. Except for a couple of weeks in toward the end of August there isn't much fishing in close to town. You need to travel 15 miles or more out to the end of the bay. It is an 80 mile round trip to where we fish halibut. To maximize fishing time as apposed to running time the boat needs to have some speed. 15 knots would be adequate. Depending on ocean conditions, I sometimes can make the ocean part of the run at 16 to 19 Knots. My 22 Cruiser will do the 80 mile round trip on 18 gallons of gas consistently. Doesn't seem to matter what speed we have to do the trip at.

Late August/early Sept - Cruise in PWS depending on weather with very little fishing. This year the weather during this time really sucked.

As you can see, our boat needs to be on a trailer.

Another reason for the davit is to pull shrimp pots from 500 to 800 feet in PWS
 
Les, interesting information naturally. The intial sales literature talked about 80 or 100 hp engines, and a 16 knot cruise. Now they are putting a 125 hp in, and your computations still suggest that the advertised performance cannot be achieved under real world conditions. And certainly the larger the engine gets, the farther from reality the advertised fuel economy gets too. Maybe some folks would pay this kind of money for a 7.5 knot boat, but I know we wouldn't. I guess my question is, have you shared these comments with Dave Livingston? Since Dave is one of the most experienced naval architects around (he was the designer of about 80% of all Bayliners between the mid-70s into the 1990s, including the Cierras and Trophys, as well as the Maxxum), and surely knows these formulae in this sleep, what is his response to this issue?
 
Here's something from Volvo Penta that I thought brats might find interesting.
http://www.volvo.com/volvopenta/global/en-gb/marineengines/Engine_Configurator/engine_configurator/

It's an 'Engine Configurator', you plug in the numbers and it recommends an engine. Using Les's numbers of a waterline length of 24', a weight of 9,000lbs, and a desired cruise speed of 15 knots, it recommends the D3 160 hp. Upping the cruise speed to 19 knots, the recommendation is the D3 190 hp. Considering that you are looking at continuous rated output (not max hp) for cruising, I'd say these recommendations jive pretty closely with what Les has stated.
 
In the meantime y'all should sneak off to the "Boats afloat" show on Lake Union and go look at hull #3 in the water.

Looks and feels real nice. As always there are some things that I personally would do differently but I have not yet seen the "perfect" boat and we all need something to do in the winter.. right !

Sorry I forgot to take my tape measure or I would have tried to answer some questions.

BTW. If you get there too early it will cost you a fortune in West Marine !!!

Merv
 
Well, it may be that the C-Ranger will have to go on a weight reduction program. I just found out that C-Dory is having some problems meeting EPA standards with the Yanmar engines and even with the 125 must detune it to 110hp. I don't know why.

This indicates to me that the hulls that are at the dealers now have detuned 125s

I am dealing on the boat that would get the last 125 that they will install. The rest will be 110s. It would be delivered in January.

I really need more performance information bad.

This will be our last hurrah and I don't want to end up being dissappointed each time I climb in the boat.

I really question whether I will be happy with this boat if it will be underpowered according to weight and design specs. It appears that the 125hp Yanmar at 125hp couldn't achieve the performance specs claimed by C-Dory. I have emailed C-Dory for some answers but haven't gotten anything yet.


I took a look at the Yamerhammer (Yanmar) website and the next size engine available is the 160hp 4LHA-HTP and it is big.

Engine 110 125 160

Wt 478lb 504lb 794lb
GPH@Max-200 RPM 4.8@ 3000 5.8@ 3600 7.5@3100
Displacement 121.7cu in 122cu in 211 cu in

The 110 and 125 are definately different blocks[/list]
 
I doubt that the rest will be 110s - I think they will do what they have to do to deliver a boat that performs as advertised. It would be very unlike either C-Dory or the Livingstons to send out a boat known not to be able to perform as advertised.


dtol":2lzfsjk5 said:
I am dealing on the boat that would get the last 125 that they will install. The rest will be 110s. It would be delivered in January.
 
What I said about which motor will be provided as an option and about detuning and problems meeting EPA standards with the 125 was told by C-Dory to my Dealer today.
 
Glad you found the information on the Volvo Penta D3; it's the engine that's being considered for the boat now. One of the interesting things about this engine and the new Yanmar BY series is that they're high speed diesels (usually having a 4,000 rpm redline) and deliver their power more akin to gas engines then to the traditional "run at 75% to 80% power" diesels used so long in trawler-style boats. So they're intended to run more in the 3,000 to 3,200 rpm range with some reserve horsepower rather than delivering most of what they've got hour after hour.

There are lots of ways to look at the CR25 and not everyone is going to have the same expectations, needs or desires. One could do a lot worse than a CR25 equipped with a natuarally aspirated Yanmar 55 cruising at 7.5 knots with enough reserve horsepower to push the boat to 10 or 11 knots with a real-world load aboard. This speed will let you get through places like Deception Pass or run into harbor a little faster if needed though I wouldn't count on cruising at that speed continuously. On the other hand the hull seems as though it's going to run quite well from perhaps 15 knots up (as I said in my first post I could only achieve 13 or so knots and it wasn't quite there...but close). It will take more horsepower than currently offered (they can/will install the Yanmar 125) if you consistently want to run at 15 knots and above and truthfully for that application I'd use the 190-hp Volvo D3 or the similar horsepower Yanmar BY engine; either will allow a sufficient margin of horsepower to deal with heavy loads, wind, rough seas or a combination of any or all of them. Really, this is what we're used to with a C-Dory 22, CD25, or almost any other higher speed planning boat. The CD25 is capable of running over 30 knots when light but I would venture to say most run between 15 knots and 20 knots. That means when there is an extra load aboard the throttle gets advanced a bit more but otherwise we keep on keeping on at our normal cruising speed...we just use a bit more of our reserve horsepower. When you install an engine that's intended to run at 75% to 80% of its rated power continuously you have don't have the luxury of reserve power to tap when the load climbs and that's what's happened in the case of the CR25. It's already using all available power to attain cruise speed when it's light and there's just nothing left to call upon (horsepower-wise) when the weight climbs.

For those that desire higher cruising speeds (15 knots and above) I believe the C-Ranger 25 will be an excellent choice once enough horsepower is available to achieve those speeds with full cruising loads. There's nothing about the hull that's been surprising to me and when comparing to other hulls it won't take any more horsepower to move the CR25 to the intended cruise speed than any other boat I'm familiar with in the same genre. The Rosborough RF-246 is the closest boat I can think of. We've rigged two of them; the last with twin BF135 Honda's to get it to cruise in the 20's and it's a lighter boat than the CR25.

I do agree that the CR25 won't meet the numbers originally published on the boat but that doesn't make the CR25 a bad boat (there isn't a thing inherently wrong with the design); it only means the estimated numbers weren't valid. Now that we know where the boat does run and what it takes to do so it will be a very good choice for folks looking for either a slower speed cruiser (with some reserve speed) with a Yanmar 55 or a nice (relatively) high speed cruiser with a 190hp engine or so.

RE: The Dinghy. My comments (for once) were not in depth regarding this in my previous post. It really depends on the dinghy; a small lightweight dinghy like you would use on the C-Dory 22 or 25 will probably fit on the top of the rear cabin area without a lot of trouble and if kept relatively low in weight (say under 50 pounds) it would probably work just fine. What I don't think is going to go up there easily is an 8'6" or so hard-bottom infaltable with a 9.9 engine hanging on the transom. It's not that something can't be engineered, with enough money and thought almost anything is possible, it's just that it means you've got a faily heavy dinghy swinging off to the side of the boat every time you launch and retrieve it and doing so from the cabin top could get "interesting". I'd throw an Avon Redstart or similar up on the cabin and call it good if I wanted the swim step clear.

That swim step is stout; I've personally been on it with 3 other 200-pounders (I don't think we were even thinking about where we were standing!) and it didn't budge at all. It shouldn't be much of a chore to mount a kicker on the swim step at all.
 
I don't think C-Dory or the Livingstons, let alone your dealer, know what they are going to do about this situation. I actually was at the Ranger factory yesterday, missed Dave and John by 15 minutes, but chatted quite a while with Lynn Livingston, and I am pretty sure that none of them will let the C-Dory, Ranger or Livingston name be associated with a dog...


dtol":1huyh4ub said:
What I said about which motor will be provided as an option and about detuning and problems meeting EPA standards with the 125 was told by C-Dory to my Dealer today.
 
dtol":3pd1r1qm said:
What I said about which motor will be provided as an option and about detuning and problems meeting EPA standards with the 125 was told by C-Dory to my Dealer today.


I don't think they understood the whole situation; it's a bit confusing at the moment with Yanmar changing their engine line up.

The 39hp through the 125hp Yanmar engines in the JH3 series do not meet the new Tier II EPA standards for diesels but new engines currently in the field (and for sale) are legal as they were built before the standards took effect. Yanmar is re-working those engine as JH4 engines that do meet the Tier II requirements. Two of those are the new JH4-75 and the new JH4-110. The 75 is somewhat available; the 110 isn't (but close). When the current stock of the JH3-125 is gone there aren't any more. The 125 is not being detuned to 110 but rather the JH3-125 isn't going to be available but the new JH4-110 is (and is actually the current 100 that develops a bit more horsepwer). Yanmar has not announced the availability of a new JH4 Tier II engine in the 125hp class. The boats shipped with the current JH3-125 really do have 125 hp and are not detuned.

The next "traditional" engine in the Yanmar lineup is the LH series which starts at 160hp. This engine is too large to fit in the engine compartment of the CR25; it's too tall. Yanmar has a new line of engines called the BY series which they developed in conjuction with BMW; they run from 150hp to 260hp. The 4-cylinder 180hp engine is very compact and close to the size of the 75/100/125 (and new 75 and 110). It's a 4,000 rpm engine with a continuous rating at 3600 rpm of 137 hp. Much more oriented to fast planning hulls versus traditional trawler-types.
 
Dtol, you need to look at the 4BY series--122 cu inches and 550 lbs. This is configured in 150 and 180 hp--and would seem be the logical next step up in HP.

I have a friend with one of the 4 JH 3-- 125 hp in his 55 foot sail boat--30,000 lbs--and it pushes it at an honest 11 to 12 knots. But this is a unique boat with a very narrow waterline hull form, a keel and underwater hull form which is very effecient--and a boat which will sail in this same speed range. He runs this engine in the 7 to 8 knot range almost all of the time to keep fuel consumption down. There are differences between the 4 JH 3 and 4 JH 4 series engines.

I would think that if the boat is designed for this speed, that it would take minimal modification of the engine beds for the higher HP. (all of these mods can be costly to the manufactuer)--I couldn't find the width of the spacing of the mounts athwartships--but look fairly close to the previous engines.
 
Les

Can they install a motor in a new boat if it doesn't meet emission standards? I think they had to detune the 125 to get it to meet the standards.

Thataway

The Penta D3-130, 160, and 190 weigh 264lbs and have a 146cu in displacement.

I hope they make a decision soon because I have decided that I won't buy this boat with a discontinued motor that won't meet national emission standards and they are just trying to eliminate existing stock and can't get the boat on plane. If it would and I am wrong, I wish someone trialing the 3 that have been delivered would let us know.

As you all can probably tell, I am in the new boat buying syndrome here.

I will find out monday if the dealer can negotiate a different motor. Construction hasn't started on it yet. Delivery is scheduled for January though.
 
dtol":nw6k0wpy said:
Les

Can they install a motor in a new boat if it doesn't meet emission standards? I think they had to detune the 125 to get it to meet the standards.

Thataway

The Penta D3-130, 160, and 190 weigh 264lbs and have a 146cu in displacement.

I hope they make a decision soon because I have decided that I won't buy this boat with a discontinued motor that won't meet national emission standards and they are just trying to eliminate existing stock and can't get the boat on plane. If it would and I am wrong, I wish someone trialing the 3 that have been delivered would let us know.

As you all can probably tell, I am in the new boat buying syndrome here.

I will find out monday if the dealer can negotiate a different motor. Construction hasn't started on it yet. Delivery is scheduled for January though.

The engine does meet the emmissions standards that were in effect when the engine was manufactured. It's exactly the same situation as exists with vehicles. A 2004 vehicle only has to meet the 2004 emmission standards and not 2007 standards as does a brand new '07 vehicle.

In this case the JH3 series met all the requirements that were in effect and is legal and they did NOT detune these engines. Even detuned a JH3 wouldn't meet the Tier II requirements. It took dropping the rpm, new computers and (I suspect) new timings and such to develop the new JH4 engines.

It really academic at any rate; the block on the 100, the 110 and the 125 is the same. In effect even in the JH3 line the 100 was a "detuned" 125 in that it didn't have the intercooler but otherwise was almost identical. With regard to the new 110 (which at the moment is the intended engine once the 125 supply is gone) it's a new Tier II engine that shares the same items as the old 100 but with the new software, injectors, lower rpm, etc.

The motivation for installing the 125 isn't to get rid of old stock; they never intended to install them in the first place. They're offering them while they last (from the distributor) to folks that want more horsepower. The intended engines (as on the spec sheet for the 2006 Seattle Boat Show) were to be the new JH4-80 and JH4-110; when Yanmar got done it turned out they kept the 75 a 75 and didn't release it as an 80 and they're just now getting close to getting the JH4-110 engines out. A new version of the 125 is either farther out in the production cycle or they've determined they can't meet Tier II with the engine (or demand for it doesn't exist in the quantity needed to justify an upgrade).

C-Ranger is between a rock and a hard place with regard to the engines at the moment. Right now the largest engine that can be put in is the JH3-125 but it's going away (and not because they want it to). That then means the largest engine they can currently fit is the Yanmar JH4-110 when it becomes available and that may not satisfy the speed requirement for some folks. At this point they're trying (and have tried) other engines to see what will fit in the space available. It's a process that takes time and as frustrating as it is for those of us waiting for boats it just is what it is. I know they want a solution for higher speeds as soon as possible and are busting their backsides to make that happen. It may be a few weeks before they're through the process so I'd suggest hanging in there until the dust settles a bit and seeing what develops.
 
Back
Top