My 26-foot Cape Cruiser currently has trim tabs that are - in my opinion - too small. They are 9" long, and 12" wide at the hinge. This is the same size that I have on my 17-foot Arima, and they work well in that application. But, on the CC, they are virtually ineffective until they are deployed almost all the way down, so I've decided to replace them with larger ones.
If I get the 12" x 12" units, I think I can swap them out without having to change the mounting position of the actuators. But, I just don't know if they will be big enough.
If I upgrade to an 18" wide tab, I'm pretty sure I'll have to relocate the actuators. But, the larger tabs might be a better match for this hull.
What size trim tabs are other folks running on their 26-foot boats, and can you speak to their effectiveness?
Lenco's trim tab ratings for reference:
9x12 tab (rated for 16-25-foot hull) = 108 sq. in. <---- current tab: definitely undersized
12x12 tab (rated for 17-30 foot hull) = 144 sq. in. <----- option 1: easiest swap, least surface area of possible upgrades (33% greater surface area than current tabs), may still be somewhat undersized
9x18 tab (rated for 22-30 foot hull) = 162 sq.in. <----- option 3: the same complexity to upgrade as option 2, only 12.5% more area than option 1 (50% greater surface area than current tabs)
12x18 tab (rated for 26-36 foot hull) = 216 sq. in. <----- option 2: twice the surface area as current tabs, but more complex swap
** I don't know if this is a valid theory, but... Comparing a known effective ratio of tab size to hull length (9x12 tabs on my 17 foot Arima hull), I come up with a target of 165 square inches per tab to get similar effectiveness from the tabs on my 26 foot CC. [108 sq. in. / 17 ft. hull length = 6.35 sq.in / ft. ... 6.35 sq. in. per foot * 26 feet = 165.1 sq. in.] So, it would seem that option 1 may still be too small, and that option 3 may actually be ideal. But, if I'm going to have to remount everything anyway, I may opt for option 2 to maximize my surface area. ... ... I've never heard of anybody complaining that they had trim tabs that were too big... Is that a concern?
Note: I'm probably overthinking this whole thing... It's what I do.
If I get the 12" x 12" units, I think I can swap them out without having to change the mounting position of the actuators. But, I just don't know if they will be big enough.
If I upgrade to an 18" wide tab, I'm pretty sure I'll have to relocate the actuators. But, the larger tabs might be a better match for this hull.
What size trim tabs are other folks running on their 26-foot boats, and can you speak to their effectiveness?
Lenco's trim tab ratings for reference:
9x12 tab (rated for 16-25-foot hull) = 108 sq. in. <---- current tab: definitely undersized
12x12 tab (rated for 17-30 foot hull) = 144 sq. in. <----- option 1: easiest swap, least surface area of possible upgrades (33% greater surface area than current tabs), may still be somewhat undersized
9x18 tab (rated for 22-30 foot hull) = 162 sq.in. <----- option 3: the same complexity to upgrade as option 2, only 12.5% more area than option 1 (50% greater surface area than current tabs)
12x18 tab (rated for 26-36 foot hull) = 216 sq. in. <----- option 2: twice the surface area as current tabs, but more complex swap
** I don't know if this is a valid theory, but... Comparing a known effective ratio of tab size to hull length (9x12 tabs on my 17 foot Arima hull), I come up with a target of 165 square inches per tab to get similar effectiveness from the tabs on my 26 foot CC. [108 sq. in. / 17 ft. hull length = 6.35 sq.in / ft. ... 6.35 sq. in. per foot * 26 feet = 165.1 sq. in.] So, it would seem that option 1 may still be too small, and that option 3 may actually be ideal. But, if I'm going to have to remount everything anyway, I may opt for option 2 to maximize my surface area. ... ... I've never heard of anybody complaining that they had trim tabs that were too big... Is that a concern?
Note: I'm probably overthinking this whole thing... It's what I do.