Thanks for all the thoughtful replies. It seems that there are two factors that need to be weighed against each other. The advantage of an air-cooled outboard(only Honda)-VS-more capable outboards that are water-cooled. I've found some used 2-stroke motors that are similar in weight(i.e. 30#), offer more horsepower, and cost just $300-$400. OMC offered various 3-4 h.p. motors from the 80s forward. Yamaha and Suzuki likewise. Tohatsu/Nissan made a 2-cycle 3.5hp motor through '06 that weighed just 29# and offered forward/neutral shifting. http://www.marine-outboards.com/Toh...Tohatsu_Marine_3_5_HP_Outboard_Boat_Motor.htmThis has since been replaced by a 4-stroke version that weighs 41#. http://www.marine-outboards.com/Toh...arine_3_5_HP_4_stroke_Outboard_Boat_Motor.htmThey also make all Mercury motors under 30 horsepower. If I went new I could get a 4-cycle Tohatsu 3.5 for about $850.00 delivered to my door. That gets me nearly twice the power for $100 less than the Honda. Since the used Hondas are so rare and command such a high price I only compare them to new alternatives. If I should embrace water-cooling then I have many, many more options in the used market. So there I am. I know that storing a salted motor is destructive but I COULD view it as "disposable", accept the destruction, and plan on replacing it when needed. $300-$400 for a capable, used, disposable motor or $950 for a less capable, new, motor that will probably outlive me. NOW what do you all think ???