Leak from bow pulpit stanchion base

Sounds like you are well on your way to a deck you can not worry about. Good you caught it when you did.

On the windlass: I've never been completely comfortable with things mounted on non-skid, and even more when they are partially on and partially off.

One good solution can be seen in "Voyager's" album (a lot of good photos of his windlass install). What he did is grind off the non-skid in the areas that end up under the windlass pad, so that it's all one level (the level of the non-non-skid). Here is a link and one photo (but there are more of the process at the link):

IMG_1235.jpg

http://www.c-brats.com/modules.php?...ame=gallery&file=index&include=view_album.php

Because I like to try stuff, I have done a test patch of a different method. Totally unnecessary of course, it works fine the other way, etc. Anyway, first thing was that I wanted my windlass up on a little "pad." I like to mount things this way when possible, and also that little bit of more height would make it so that I could bring a line around the base to the cleat with a little nicer lead (this is a Lewmar 700 horizontal). So I made a pad out of, IIRC, 3/8" fiberglass board. Rounded on the edges, etc.

Then my idea was why not cast epoxy on the bottom to match the non-skid, and I could have an installation that was like a "flat" deck, only without grinding off the non-skid. I'd just bed this "keyed" pad as I would anything else.

I waxed the non-skid in the area in question, then "buttered" a test piece of fiberglass (to simulate the pad), pressed it in place until the "points" of the nonskid just touched the pad, and then let it cure to a fairly solid but slightly green stage. Then popped it off, trimmed the edges with a utility knife, and let it cure completely. When I then set it on the deck it "locked in" perfectly.

So, I think that's probably what I will do to mount the windlass. I realize this isn't what most people (or maybe anyone else) would do, and it's not necessary or maybe even ideal, but I like it. Just figured I'd mention it since we're tossing around ideas.

I ended up deciding not to mount the windlass (yet) since my near-future cruising was going to be mostly shallow water cruising, but I imagine I will mount it before anything "deep" where I'm putting out/bringing in tons of rode.

I don't have any photos of my test "reverse non-skid" piece, but here are two of the pad while I was making it. The fiberglass board is from McMaster-Carr.

IMG_6583.jpg

IMG_6584.jpg

Anyway, in summary, I prefer not to bed to non-skid, so I'd either remove it or do a "reverse non-skid" pad like I tried out. Of course, once you remove the core and fill with thickened epoxy, leaks won't be so much of a concern.
 
Your reverse non-skid pad looks great. My windlass is also a Lewmar V700. I'd thought of grinding down the nonskid but I'm reluctant to cut into things -- need to get over that, apparently -- and the photos from Voyager are reassuring. Also thought of building a "pad" of 4200 by applying it in sufficient thickness to fill the nonskid and all the space remaining under the windlass. It's possible that either butyl tape or BoatLife Calk would do the same thing, too, and they appear to stay more flexible than 4200 (good or bad under a windlass?). And we can see whether Lewmar offers a thicker pad themselves. Right now the epoxy fill material is hardening and I'm building a box in which to mount the windlass breaker and up/down switch, since my dash is already filled.
 
And one more possible material: rope caulk. One of my sailing mags just carried an article by an old sailor who says he's used hardware store rope caulk for bedding deck hardware for 15 years and never had a failure. I got out an old box from the basement where it's been around more than 30 years, and it was starting to dry out but still flexible enough to use under a door sill. In use, it feels a lot like butyl tape, perhaps a little more dense. Will try to find out what is in it.
 
If you are reluctant to grind down the non-skid, and you don't want to bed straight to it (understandable), and you like the idea of a pad..... then maybe consider the "reverse non-skid" way?

Sounds like you are getting pretty comfortable with epoxy.

Basically, here is what I would do when it comes time to mount the windlass if I opt for the "reverse non-skid" way:

1) figure out exactly where I want it (I did this already, but of course I would do it again and mark things off, etc.).

2) Wax the deck well around the area (plus mask off, etc.)

3) Butter the bottom of the pad with thickened epoxy and press it down right where I want it.

4) Let it cure to the advanced green stage (holds its shape, but still somewhat workable with a utility knife).

5) Pull it off the deck and trim the edges flush.

6) Then when I go to mount the windlass, bed it. Might use butyl, or might use caulk for the better "flowiness."

It's too bad I don't have a photo of my test sample. And I'm not where I can get to it right now.

OTOH, this is a bit "outside the box," so maybe not the type of thing to encourage others to do when I haven't even done it yet (except for my trial sample). If I don't do it this way, I'll be sanding off the non-skid just like Voyager did. Sure, if I go to change windlasses there will be a "mark"; but on the other hand, presumably a new windlass would be going on, and at that point one could grind off an area, say, 2" around the new windlass (to cover up any overlaps from the old one), and simply paint or gelcoat it. This is a common look on sailboats where there is often a 1-2" smooth glossy area around stanchion bases, divisions in the non-skid, etc.

As I think about it, if I were going to "encourage" you to do it any certain way, I guess I'd recommend the latter. Just follow Voyager's excellent model in the album.

I would use butyl if doing it that way.
 
To answer the original question re have others found leaking pulpit mounts, YES. One spot was quite bad. The others are hard to say. All had a dab of bath tub caulk under the mount point. The holes were really discolored and one had a little soft spot, but that could happen even without a leak at that location.

Here's the problem with a leak in a balsa core. The spot where the leak occurs gets wet enough to rot and the surrounding wood gets moisture loaded. Another fitting, maybe several feet away has metal through deck fastenings that aren't leaking. On a cold night, the coldest spot in the moist balsa core is that metal fastener transmitting the cold from outside. That creates condensation right on the fastener. On a warm morning with sun on the deck, the inside of the boat may still be cold. Again, that cold metal fastener is going to attract condensation from the moist wood. That is how fittings that aren't actually leaking can look like they are leaking and even support rot. It makes diagnosis difficult.

I'm still tearing my boat apart and will be posting more pictures. My latest find is that many of the little snap fittings for my bimini go right into the balsa. I can't drill those out very big or the replaced snap fastener won't cover the epoxy filled hole.

Mark
 
Another potential problem (which you are probably well aware of by now) is that if the balsa around a fitting/fastener gets damp/soft, then oftentimes the fastener is tightened, the core compresses - now you have a dish to funnel even more water in, more compression, etc. This is worse with individual washers than backing plates, but of course water in the core is never great.

One of the nice things about the thickened epoxy annulus is that not only does it help to seal off the core, but you now have what amounts to a compression post too, for tightening the fasteners against.
 
After all the core repair work; camfer ( with a camfer drill bit) the top surface to be caulked. This provides a place for the sealant to ( o-ring ) around the fastener shank. Also solves the problem of all the sealant from sqeezeing out. With machine bolt hardware, turn the nut not the bolt shank. With screw hardware, no choice but to turn the shank.
Sad, that builders won't take the time to seal properly !
alan
 
Good point on the chamfer. I have an older drill with a chuck that is a pain to operate, so I reduced it to chamfer-only status, and just keep a chamfer bit in it at all times. In addition to the benefits you mentioned, the beveled top surface also helps to prevent spider cracking, if the top surface is gelcoated (without the chamfer, cracks tend to radiate out from the hole - many were like this on my C-Dory, luckily most/all of them were under hardware and/or the new chamfer superseded them).
 
Back
Top