Gene&Mary
New member
I wonder why members should not discuss politics on this forum. I understand this is a boating forum but to expect members to not discuss something that is currently foremost in everyone's mind is unreasonable. Politics is so intertwined with the Covid 19 pandemic as to make it almost impossible to discuss it without straying into politics. We are all political and we all have opinions, As long as we discuss ideas and opinions, never personally attack anyone who is a member of the forum and Just be Nice, political opinion should be fair game. You can have forceful opinions and still remain with in those parameters. I for one enjoy hearing opinions that I wouldn't ordinarily hear within my political bubble.
I believe the Governors were forced to take it as far as they did. At the start of the pandemic the governors (and public) were operating on incomplete, non-existent and incorrect information regarding the severity of Covid 19. In fact during the early stages, information was being classified as Top Secret and was only being discussed in congressional committees and by congressmen in their by-invitation-only clubs. The Chinese Government was being transparent and the WHO was doing a great job. The only action being taken by knowledgeable politicians seemed to be the selling of stock so their 401Ks didn't take the hit that ours did. Everything was great and soon the number of cases would be down to 0. These are facts, not political opinion.
Given the public's ignorance of the potential of Covid 19, there was no way the Governors could have, early on, taken the measures necessary to contain the virus. The public just would not have accepted it. It was only later as the pandemic spread that the public became accepting of the measures we have now......at least by some polls 60-80% of us have.
Could the Governors have fine tuned their stay at home orders and essential businesses? Probably, but even at that time, little was really known about the virus. The objective was to lower the curve. Given the "novel" nature of the virus, it was better to over-react than to under-react. Hind sight is 20/20 but I'm on the side of over-reaction.
I expect for the next unknown period of time the operable phrase will be "Hammer and Dance".
I believe the Governors were forced to take it as far as they did. At the start of the pandemic the governors (and public) were operating on incomplete, non-existent and incorrect information regarding the severity of Covid 19. In fact during the early stages, information was being classified as Top Secret and was only being discussed in congressional committees and by congressmen in their by-invitation-only clubs. The Chinese Government was being transparent and the WHO was doing a great job. The only action being taken by knowledgeable politicians seemed to be the selling of stock so their 401Ks didn't take the hit that ours did. Everything was great and soon the number of cases would be down to 0. These are facts, not political opinion.
Given the public's ignorance of the potential of Covid 19, there was no way the Governors could have, early on, taken the measures necessary to contain the virus. The public just would not have accepted it. It was only later as the pandemic spread that the public became accepting of the measures we have now......at least by some polls 60-80% of us have.
Could the Governors have fine tuned their stay at home orders and essential businesses? Probably, but even at that time, little was really known about the virus. The objective was to lower the curve. Given the "novel" nature of the virus, it was better to over-react than to under-react. Hind sight is 20/20 but I'm on the side of over-reaction.
I expect for the next unknown period of time the operable phrase will be "Hammer and Dance".