I am not jumping in to argue, but the practice for inboard boats, is considerably different than what is used on outboard powered boats. Roger and my Tom Cat were not ABYC (NMEA) certified--C Dory obtained certification status some time last year. It would be interesting to see how the current boats are rigged.
SO if our boats are not to ABYC/NMEA standards, should not C Dory offer a general recall, and bring the boats to standards?
Incidently the regulations for pleasure vessels are at the boat builder's handbook by USCG:
http://uscgboating.org/safety/boatbuild ... /PART1.pdf
Complete reference is Code of Fed Regs 33 sect 183...
ABYC basically goes back to fire safety standards, and Underwriter's Laboratories fire resistance. By these standards, the plastic is not acceptable.
My Tom Cat is 255 has approved hose from the fuel filter to the bulb and from the bulb (which is inside of the cockpit cabinet--and is probably not "fire proof") to the outboard. In the CD 25 many of the boats have plastic fuel tanks--and at least one has leaked--as did at least one of the Tom Cat 24's. The Fuel tank and cockpit are isolated from the cabin (at least in the bilge). None of the outboard boats are requried to have blowers. The chance of spark in the cockpit is probably minimal--but still possiable. I blieve that the electric pump in Roger's boat is not factory installed. The only electric mechinery down in the hulls of my Tom Cat are the bilge pumps.
One other feature of the plastic bottoms of the Racor separators, is that the easily hand opened drain has a hose barb and the fuel/water can be easily drained into a container. If you have a metal container, you cannot see the fuel/water interface, and removing a plug, you have to let all of the fuel drain into a larger container--if you can get it in place. In the Tom Cat, there is no splash well (as is true of many boats)--and the fuel water separator would go on the outside of the transom--a major problem of a different nature, including rust and corrosion of the filter and filter holder. Not necessarilly arguing that the plastic is better or safer, but making some points for them. I like these clear bowls, and am not fully convinced that this is "illegal". I am not going to change the plastic bowl Racors on the Tom Cat and CD 25. From the Racor literature, the metal bowl is designated for inboard and inboard/outboard engines--the see thru plastic bowl is designated for outboards--with no caviat about being in the splash well, or inside of the cockpit. I fully understand the implications of the plastic bowls.
SO if our boats are not to ABYC/NMEA standards, should not C Dory offer a general recall, and bring the boats to standards?
Incidently the regulations for pleasure vessels are at the boat builder's handbook by USCG:
http://uscgboating.org/safety/boatbuild ... /PART1.pdf
Complete reference is Code of Fed Regs 33 sect 183...
ABYC basically goes back to fire safety standards, and Underwriter's Laboratories fire resistance. By these standards, the plastic is not acceptable.
My Tom Cat is 255 has approved hose from the fuel filter to the bulb and from the bulb (which is inside of the cockpit cabinet--and is probably not "fire proof") to the outboard. In the CD 25 many of the boats have plastic fuel tanks--and at least one has leaked--as did at least one of the Tom Cat 24's. The Fuel tank and cockpit are isolated from the cabin (at least in the bilge). None of the outboard boats are requried to have blowers. The chance of spark in the cockpit is probably minimal--but still possiable. I blieve that the electric pump in Roger's boat is not factory installed. The only electric mechinery down in the hulls of my Tom Cat are the bilge pumps.
One other feature of the plastic bottoms of the Racor separators, is that the easily hand opened drain has a hose barb and the fuel/water can be easily drained into a container. If you have a metal container, you cannot see the fuel/water interface, and removing a plug, you have to let all of the fuel drain into a larger container--if you can get it in place. In the Tom Cat, there is no splash well (as is true of many boats)--and the fuel water separator would go on the outside of the transom--a major problem of a different nature, including rust and corrosion of the filter and filter holder. Not necessarilly arguing that the plastic is better or safer, but making some points for them. I like these clear bowls, and am not fully convinced that this is "illegal". I am not going to change the plastic bowl Racors on the Tom Cat and CD 25. From the Racor literature, the metal bowl is designated for inboard and inboard/outboard engines--the see thru plastic bowl is designated for outboards--with no caviat about being in the splash well, or inside of the cockpit. I fully understand the implications of the plastic bowls.