ssobol":2f31p7y5 said:
Not to mention that the overall environmental impact greater and thermodynamic return is lower of growing/using ethanol for a fuel supplement than if you just used straight gasoline. Maybe at one time there was a potential need for it in a world of gas shortages. But there is a glut of gasoline right now and even then there are better alternatives (at least for cars).
Ethanol in gasoline provides a farmer, instead of an oil refiner, with revenue. The "footprint" you are referring to, is a very complicated and unsolved equation. You can be sure there are significant costs and environmental penalties produced by obtaining both fuels. I am very well educated on the subject, I would chose an ethanol economy over an oil economy, but it is not that simple, and certainly not possible. The fact remains, ethanol recycles CO'2, gasoline does not.
Very few boats or cars have carbs, and old gas with or without ethanol is likely to gum up the works if it sits for months. I have been running dirtbikes, chainsaws, outboards, cars and trucks forever on fuel that contains ethanol. If I am not going to use a piece of equipment, I store it properly. I have had problems with engines, but I would say that as a trend over the last decade, reliabilty has improved. So does that mean ethanol fuel is actually superior? I am just trying to point out that many people run ethanol fuel with no issues. Many people run non ethanol fuel with no issues. That does not, a hypothesis make.
I am not a particularly lucky guy. (note dirtbikes) I love explosive fuel in internal combustion engines, but I dig my lithium battery power tools, too. I was a late convert, becuase I loved the power of my porter cable circular saw. Then I noticed it weighed twice as much as my Ryobi. I was not winding cords all the time. My observation is that people need a reason to distrust things that are good for them. They may think engines always work unless there is ethanol in the fuel. BTW, I use Stabil in portable engines and boats.