I took my 26 yr old son out for a day of father/son bonding. He was up from Vancouver and had never been on the boat. We headed out @ 0900 from Everett and dumped two pots in the small bay just to the east of Camano Island State Park @ about 1100. We decided to make the run to Coupeville to eat some lunch and let them soak.
Returned about 1430 and picked them up. Exactly the same bait in both pots, although the pots are different makes; the significance of which I will explain later.
Pot one=one male, too small to keep. Oh, well. Pot two=eleven crab (boy was my son EXCITED upon pulling it up!!!!)...but, only one keeper. :roll: Either JUST too small or females. Back they went. Based on the time, we decided to move, re-bait, dunk again and soak for one hour.
Pull at about 1530. Pot one=one undersized male (again :x ). Pot two=eight crab; all BARELY undersized or female. :amgry :? Hmmmmmmm...pot one is less efficient at catching them. Why? :? A quick look at each pot and my question was answered.
Pot one is a Willapa brand, I bought at Fisheries Supply for about $80. The design is, IMO, lousy. The wire mesh used to make the trap is bent up at the bottom of the gates, thus creating about a ~1" barrier to a crab trying to enter. It would have to get OVER the wire mesh to get in.
Pot two is a McKay brand I bought from a boat dealer in Everett for about $100. The entrance to the gates is flat to the bottom of the pot & thus the ocean floor. It also seems like it's a much better quality made trap. I posted pics in my album.
I'm going to cut the bottom wire off of pot one, remove the gates and lower and re-bend the gates so it's a smoother transition/entrance. My thinking is crabs walk on the bottom and creating a barrier, even a small one, is just making it harder for crabs to enter the trap. It seemed to be "proven" by my experiences yesterday, albeit it a very unscientific study.
I know Fred swears by the inexspensive folding traps (~$40) and I've seen what he & Robbi caught at Bellingham so now I'm regretting pot one (Willapa) I bought from Fisheries.
Returned about 1430 and picked them up. Exactly the same bait in both pots, although the pots are different makes; the significance of which I will explain later.
Pot one=one male, too small to keep. Oh, well. Pot two=eleven crab (boy was my son EXCITED upon pulling it up!!!!)...but, only one keeper. :roll: Either JUST too small or females. Back they went. Based on the time, we decided to move, re-bait, dunk again and soak for one hour.
Pull at about 1530. Pot one=one undersized male (again :x ). Pot two=eight crab; all BARELY undersized or female. :amgry :? Hmmmmmmm...pot one is less efficient at catching them. Why? :? A quick look at each pot and my question was answered.
Pot one is a Willapa brand, I bought at Fisheries Supply for about $80. The design is, IMO, lousy. The wire mesh used to make the trap is bent up at the bottom of the gates, thus creating about a ~1" barrier to a crab trying to enter. It would have to get OVER the wire mesh to get in.
Pot two is a McKay brand I bought from a boat dealer in Everett for about $100. The entrance to the gates is flat to the bottom of the pot & thus the ocean floor. It also seems like it's a much better quality made trap. I posted pics in my album.
I'm going to cut the bottom wire off of pot one, remove the gates and lower and re-bend the gates so it's a smoother transition/entrance. My thinking is crabs walk on the bottom and creating a barrier, even a small one, is just making it harder for crabs to enter the trap. It seemed to be "proven" by my experiences yesterday, albeit it a very unscientific study.
I know Fred swears by the inexspensive folding traps (~$40) and I've seen what he & Robbi caught at Bellingham so now I'm regretting pot one (Willapa) I bought from Fisheries.