gljjr":2zbkdq5p said:
Tyboo Mike,
When you are on the Columbia, do you use the Columbia River System anchor with the large bouy and anchor lift?
Nope. That's why I got the windlass, so I don't have to go out and fetch the ball. It is no more complicated, or dangerous, than any other operation performed on the water. You have to keep the rode in front of the boat and not under it. Requires the same skill and common sense used to keep anything in the water, like buoys, docks, other boats, the shore, etc., from under the boat. Mistakes can happen with anything, and they are no more apt to happen with a windlass. If any point could be argued, it is that a windlass system - alone - is the safest.
Just watching those guys make the big circle around the anchor ball out in the middle of all the other anchored boats is kinda scary, and enough to dissuade me from that system. The first year I had a C-Dory on the Columbia, I pulled the anchor the old fashioned way. But without a competent second hand aboard, it is not safe in the current. With the windlass, I can go fishing alone or with the kids, and not have to worry about it.
When I need to power up to relieve the anchor line tension, it is due to current. I power forward only enough to do that, and not overrun the rope. It is either in/out of gear, or throttle up/down to help the windlass. I still make it do the work. If it is slack water, and no line tension, the windlass does all the work.
When I stated earlier that the story was an eye opener for me, I meant it in the same sense as passing a car wreck on the highway is an eye opener. It always makes one more cautious on that particular spot in the road, and more careful with the lethal weapon attached to the steering wheel in your hands. It does not necessarily make you change routes in the future, or alter the features of your car.
Now then, reading back over all that it sounds like I'm being a smart aleck. Not my intention at all. Events like depicted in the initial post here are good to be informed of, because it increases the awareness and decreases the likelihood of it happening to me. I appreciate that.
Now that you all know I am not the smart aleck you thought I was, it is a good time to share a thought or two about raising the freeboard in the splash well. I have thought about it myself, and decided against it. If water slapped the stern with sufficient force and volume to come over the splash well and cause immediate danger, it is most likely that it would be able to get over the extra six inches that the transom board would provide. Without the transom board, the depth of retained water is six inches lower than the sides of the boat. That's 1250 pounds of water that would immediately fall right back out as soon as the wave that brought it subsides. (If the wave doesn't subside, then you're screwed anyway.) If you get that much water that suddenly, the boat is in immediate peril and the skipper's pants are wet whether the water came into the cabin or not. I would think that evacuating the water as quickly as possible is key. If the water made it over an added transom board and filled the boat, it's time to jump ship. If it came over the stock splash well, and filled it only to there, you still have a fighting chance. If you are calculating your diminished risk by having six inches more boat, then you really should just get a bigger boat in the first place. At the very least, construct the added board so that it resists external pressure, but breaks away easily from internal force.
OK Dan, doggone it, go ahead and beat the crap out of me.