Long range tanks in a 16' Angler- part 2

[AK Angler]

Well, I only made a few runs with the big tanks before I sold her. But there was a long run out to Latouche (150 miles round trip). The boat handled just fine with the tanks, loaded and empty. I didn't notice any adverse effects I could pin on the forward position of the tanks. And I loved having the added range without tripping over the usual added gas cans.

[Chuck S]

Lloyd --

We have a pair of 6 gallon tanks on our 16 Cruiser with Honda 50. Not sure how we'd put the side tanks in there, there's positive foam flotation where'd they go. Not sure the length requirements, but positive flotation is a requirement certainly on under-16 foot boats. Note the VIN on a 16 reads 15.

There's room under the berth for a couple more portable tanks. And I suppose since these are open boats the fuel lines could run thru to the motor. I know that for trim purposes we're using a Perma Trim and I use the center fuel tank first.

Cockpit is so small on a 16 cruiser that a 3d tank just won't fit.

I'd line some sort of stern seat too.

-- Chuck

[AK Angler]

Chuck-

Just a note. The positive foam floatation is a requirement for the manufacturers or boat builders. Owners can add, move, or simply remove any of the foam with no reprecussions. If you were concerned about it, the foam could simply be moved to another location. Like behind the tanks in the transom area, or in the forward berth. (The recommended amount of foam placed under the motorwell would take up less space than a 50-gallon tank crammed in there, and you could still get to the bilge. And the saddle tanks move the weight forward too.)

Still, moving the foam to make room for more fuel, or to simply get the fuel tanks and gas cans out of the way may or may not make sense for your individual situation. Those Honda 50's are pretty good fuel misers. My 2-stroke Johnson needed all the extra she could carry for our long trips with no fuel stops available along the way. [/url]