View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Gene&Mary
Joined: 10 Jan 2005 Posts: 206 City/Region: Seattle/Center Island
State or Province: WA
C-Dory Year: 2005
C-Dory Model: 22 Cruiser
Vessel Name: Linnea
Photos: Linnea
|
Posted: Fri Jul 22, 2016 1:54 pm Post subject: Prop pitch question |
|
|
I have a 2014 Suzuki 90 which came with a 3x13.75x17 prop. The max revs I could get was ~53-5400 rpm. I changed to a 3x14x15 and could then get ~6000 rpm which is what I understand is what you should get from a Suzuki 90.
Judging from the feel I need to increase the revs of the engine to get the same speed with the new prop.......seems intuitively logical. I don't have a way of actually measuring the speed so I'm doing this just by feel.
I do get up on plane quicker but I didn't think that was necessarily a problem with the old prop.
My question is- Is the increased revs better for the engine so it doesn't lug or for some other reason? Is the mpg decreased because of the higher revs needed for a given speed? Which prop does everyone think is the best for primary use? I will of course keep the other one as a backup.
Thanks |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Aurelia
Joined: 21 Aug 2009 Posts: 2335 City/Region: Gig Harbor
State or Province: WA
Photos: Aurelia
|
Posted: Fri Jul 22, 2016 2:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It sounds like your newer prop with lower pitch is better suited to how you ran the boat. If your testing up to 6000rpm included a normal load of fuel, passengers, and cargo for you and was at an elevation where you will normally run the boat, you have a good working prop and motor combo.
Lugging the motor is what happens when you can't reach the designed top RPM and that is not good for the boat in the long term. We also switched to a slightly larger but lower pitch prop on our boat for quicker planning and better overall handling (less lugging) of our heavy cruise loads.
You will run a higher RPM for a given speed than you did with the original prop and that might equate to a bit more fuel use at that speed. But....you can just slow down a bit and run at a speed that works well for you and stop comparing one prop to another with speed in mind. We lost some speed on our boat when we changed props but gained a better feeling boat with a little less stress on the engine.
Greg _________________ Greg, Cindie & Aven
Gig Harbor
Aurelia - 25 Cruiser sold 2012
Ari - 19 Cruiser sold 2023
currently exploring with "Lia", 17 ft Bullfrog Supersport Pilothouse |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
thataway
Joined: 02 Nov 2003 Posts: 21357 City/Region: Pensacola
State or Province: FL
C-Dory Year: 2007
C-Dory Model: 25 Cruiser
Vessel Name: thataway
Photos: Thataway
|
Posted: Fri Jul 22, 2016 6:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Generally the fuel consumption is related to the HP output of the engine. If the engine is fully loaded, then it is related to RPM. But when you are loading the engine less, and using the same HP, the fuel consumption should be almost the same (not measurable) and it will give less wear on the engine. There are a lot of factors--and Greg mentioned some--altitude, load, bottom condition, engine trim, engine height, etc.
Better to stick with the prop you have now. (The lower pitch),. There are some who run at displacement speeds all of the time, and they will over pitch the prop slightly. _________________ Bob Austin
Thataway
Thataway (Ex Seaweed) 2007 25 C Dory May 2018 to Oct. 2021
Thisaway 2006 22' CDory November 2011 to May 2018
Caracal 18 140 Suzuki 2007 to present
Thataway TomCat 255 150 Suzukis June 2006 thru August 2011
C Pelican; 1992, 22 Cruiser, 2002 thru 2006
Frequent Sea; 2003 C D 25, 2007 thru 2009
KA6PKB
Home port: Pensacola FL |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
capt. meares
Joined: 04 Jul 2013 Posts: 146 City/Region: Tillamook
State or Province: OR
C-Dory Year: 1988
C-Dory Model: 22 Cruiser
Vessel Name: Vianey
Photos: Vianey
|
Posted: Fri Jul 22, 2016 8:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I have a 22 cruiser, with a 2015 DF90 Suzuki. The prop the motor came with could not get the boat above 5200 RPM's, with frequent cavitation. After much research I was able to narrow down which prop was best, and now get to 6500 RPM WOT, and no cavitation. The owners manual for this motor says the WOT needs to be between 6200-6800 RPM's |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Discovery
Joined: 08 Dec 2003 Posts: 1245 City/Region: LOA, UTAH
State or Province: UT
C-Dory Year: 2006
C-Dory Model: 255 Tomcat
Vessel Name: Discovery
Photos: Discovery
|
Posted: Fri Jul 22, 2016 8:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I guess I don't understand the reason to run at WOT on a 4 stroke engine. Your car is capable of running at 6500 RPM, but the manufacturer gears the trans to run the engine at 1800 to 2200. My Honda 135 is a car engine standing in its end. Explain? _________________
Brent and Dixie,
1984 22' Classic sold 2003
2003 24' TomCat sold 2005
2006 TC255 Discovery Sold 2020
2006 CD 22' Angler Sold 2014
https://share.delorme.com/FBrentBetenson
"Free men do not ask permission to bear arms." ~ Thomas Jefferson |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
thataway
Joined: 02 Nov 2003 Posts: 21357 City/Region: Pensacola
State or Province: FL
C-Dory Year: 2007
C-Dory Model: 25 Cruiser
Vessel Name: thataway
Photos: Thataway
|
Posted: Sat Jul 23, 2016 12:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
Discovery wrote: | I guess I don't understand the reason to run at WOT on a 4 stroke engine. Your car is capable of running at 6500 RPM, but the manufacturer gears the trans to run the engine at 1800 to 2200. My Honda 135 is a car engine standing in its end. Explain? |
True, but the boat going at planing speeds, is like a loaded truck going up hill all of the time. Certainly it is best for the engine, to run at displacement speeds --more like the car analogy.
I don't think that many of us run our engines at WOT--except to be sure that they are not lugging along the way. I try and keep my outboard engines below 4500 RPM--For some reason, (gearing) it is harder to do this with Honda, than Suzuki... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Discovery
Joined: 08 Dec 2003 Posts: 1245 City/Region: LOA, UTAH
State or Province: UT
C-Dory Year: 2006
C-Dory Model: 255 Tomcat
Vessel Name: Discovery
Photos: Discovery
|
Posted: Sat Jul 23, 2016 10:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
With the 135's on the TomCat. We usually run on a clean plane at 20 to 22 MPH at about 3800 to 4000 RPM, Honda 17" pitch stainless props. Never have I had the feeling I was lugging the engines. Now over 1000 hours on the engines. The FloScan tach and fuel gauge shows this to be our sweet spot for fuel consumption. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Gene&Mary
Joined: 10 Jan 2005 Posts: 206 City/Region: Seattle/Center Island
State or Province: WA
C-Dory Year: 2005
C-Dory Model: 22 Cruiser
Vessel Name: Linnea
Photos: Linnea
|
Posted: Sat Jul 23, 2016 10:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
capt. meares- what prop did you finally settle on? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
tsturm
Joined: 01 Nov 2003 Posts: 1164 City/Region: Soldotna
State or Province: AK
C-Dory Year: 2003
C-Dory Model: 25 Cruiser
Vessel Name: JMR TOO
Photos: JMR-TOO
|
Posted: Sat Jul 23, 2016 11:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
Discovery wrote: | I guess I don't understand the reason to run at WOT on a 4 stroke engine. Your car is capable of running at 6500 RPM, but the manufacturer gears the trans to run the engine at 1800 to 2200. My Honda 135 is a car engine standing in its end. Explain? |
You can downshift the car when going up hill.(or as the load demands)
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
capt. meares
Joined: 04 Jul 2013 Posts: 146 City/Region: Tillamook
State or Province: OR
C-Dory Year: 1988
C-Dory Model: 22 Cruiser
Vessel Name: Vianey
Photos: Vianey
|
Posted: Sat Jul 23, 2016 12:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
3x13.875x15 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Discovery
Joined: 08 Dec 2003 Posts: 1245 City/Region: LOA, UTAH
State or Province: UT
C-Dory Year: 2006
C-Dory Model: 255 Tomcat
Vessel Name: Discovery
Photos: Discovery
|
Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2016 12:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
You can downshift the car when going up hill.(or as the load demands)
[/quote]
If I'm running clean and fully on plane at 3800 RPM and 22 MPH, by going at 6300 RPM and 40 MPH, I'm not running any cleaner or further out of the water. I'm just going faster and burning more gas. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Lighthouse Express
Joined: 16 Jun 2012 Posts: 83 City/Region: Auburn, CA
State or Province: CA
C-Dory Year: 2004
C-Dory Model: 25 Cruiser
Vessel Name: Lighthouse Express
Photos: Lighthouse Express
|
Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2016 11:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
Gene&Mary
You may want to take a look at this video to get a general idea of the proper sizing of a prop: http://propellerhub.com/sizing-and-selection.html
Enjoy,
Heinz _________________ "Life is Good" |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|