View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
TomCaz
Joined: 10 Aug 2010 Posts: 16 City/Region: Edgewater
State or Province: MD
C-Dory Year: 1993
C-Dory Model: 16 Angler
|
Posted: Thu Aug 26, 2010 8:22 pm Post subject: 2010 60 hp suzuki |
|
|
the 2010 redesigned 60 hp suzuki weight is less than the 50 and 40 Hp suzuki AND about 20 lbs less than the yamaha and a bit more narrow.
So my question is the 60 hp to much for 16 angler?
Tom _________________ "Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery"
Winston Churchill |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Matt Gurnsey Dealer
Joined: 11 Nov 2008 Posts: 1532 City/Region: Port Orchard
State or Province: WA
Photos: Kitsap Marina
|
Posted: Thu Aug 26, 2010 8:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I beleive the boat is rated for 55 horsepower, so the 60 should be okay.
The next generation Suzuki 40/50 will be built on the same platform as the 60. _________________ Matt Gurnsey
Kitsap Marina
www.kitsapmarina.com
360-895-2193
(888) 293-7991 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Sneaks
Joined: 06 Jun 2004 Posts: 2020 City/Region: San Diego (Encinitas)
State or Province: CA
C-Dory Year: 1993
C-Dory Model: 16 Angler
Vessel Name: C-Brat
Photos: Jenny B and C-Brat
|
Posted: Thu Aug 26, 2010 10:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Tom, I've been waffling between the Yamaha 50/60 and the Suzuki 60 to re-power my newly renamed acquisition, and the weights you quote just don't jibe.
The Yamaha weighs 237 lbs
The Suzuki weighs 229 lbs
That's an 8 lb difference, not enough to get excited over. the problem is determining how they were both weighed and with what accessories or, for that matter, oil full or empty as shipped? Equal isn't always "equal" in the marketing world.
I'd trust a dealer who carries both brands and weighed them objectively before I'd trust a Corporate marketing angel.
Don _________________ Mary & Don Anderson
Brat #483
"Jenny B" 2005 C-22/F75 sold, Oct. 2008
"C-Brat" 1993 C-16 angler/50 hp |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
TomCaz
Joined: 10 Aug 2010 Posts: 16 City/Region: Edgewater
State or Province: MD
C-Dory Year: 1993
C-Dory Model: 16 Angler
|
Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 6:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
Don,
I think I confused the mecury 60 weight listed at 247 for the yamaha. 237 is correct for the yama as you noted.
Lots of yamaha engines in this area but the guys with suzuki really speak highly of their performance. The suzuki does appear to be more naarrow which is a good thing on the little 16 especially with a kicker. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
DoryLvr
Joined: 05 Feb 2009 Posts: 290 City/Region: Cape Charles
State or Province: VA
C-Dory Year: 2003
C-Dory Model: 16 Cruiser
Vessel Name: Litl' Tug
Photos: Litl' Tug
|
Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 7:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
I have had 4 Yamaha engines (2 50HP, 1 9.9HP and 1 25HP all 4 stroke) on the various boats I have had. Some of those engines replaced OMC engines that came with the boat and I re-engined them. I love the Yamahas. I have found dealer support to be great, parts easy to find, very reliable, I love the freshwater flush port that doesn't require running with mouse ears. I don't think I would ever have an OMC. The Coast Guard used to use OMC engines when I was on small boats, but that was well before the Hondas they use now. We always had boats down. Just my plug for the Yamahas and I can't say I have ever even been on a boat with a Suzuki, so just my two cents on what a great engine I think the Yamaha is. _________________ Tivo Romero, CWO2, USCG (Ret)
DoryLvr
16' Cruiser - Litl' Tug (SOLD)
"The art of seamanship is never allowing yourself to get in a situation where you have to know anything about the subject." |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Sneaks
Joined: 06 Jun 2004 Posts: 2020 City/Region: San Diego (Encinitas)
State or Province: CA
C-Dory Year: 1993
C-Dory Model: 16 Angler
Vessel Name: C-Brat
Photos: Jenny B and C-Brat
|
Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 9:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
TomCaz wrote: |
Lots of yamaha engines in this area but the guys with suzuki really speak highly of their performance. The suzuki does appear to be more naarrow which is a good thing on the little 16 especially with a kicker. |
Ahh yes, performance. NO disrespect intended but if I wanted performance I would have passed up the C-Dory line altogether. Seriously, I'll probably go Yamaha because there are way more places to get it serviced here in the San Diego area and my super satisfied experience with the Yamaha on the Jenny B. I'm with Dorylvr on this one. I loved the freshwater flush connection too. It works as a hot shower on freshwater lakes.
All things being equal, you'll probably be totally happy with either choice so go with your gut feeling.
Don |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Noreaster
Joined: 24 Apr 2007 Posts: 86 City/Region: Wallace
State or Province: MI
C-Dory Year: 2006
C-Dory Model: 16 Angler
Vessel Name: Nor'easter
Photos: Nor'easter
|
Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 11:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
If the Coast Gaurd data sticker limits you to 55 H.P. You may have issues with insurance also with the Coast Gaurd if they do a spot check. _________________ Lenny |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Matt Gurnsey Dealer
Joined: 11 Nov 2008 Posts: 1532 City/Region: Port Orchard
State or Province: WA
Photos: Kitsap Marina
|
Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 5:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
My Yamaha information lists the 50-60 weight at 247. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|