The C-Brats Forum Index
HomeForumsMy TopicsCalendarEvent SignupsMemberlistOur C-DorysThe Brat MapPhotos

Tofino Boat Sinking - Two Dead April 30, 2017
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    The C-Brats Forum Index -> Boating Safety
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
bobjarrard



Joined: 03 Oct 2010
Posts: 458
City/Region: Boulder City
State or Province: NV
PostPosted: Thu May 04, 2017 1:28 am    Post subject: way to start Reply with quote

I spent some time on the ACR site. That seems like one really first group buy. ACR likely best for us as the + model floats. Flotation is another hot item as is a good ditch bag to start putting this stuff into. Perhaps we could contact one of the major retail distributors - even online source. Just some first thoughts here!!
Bob
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address
thataway



Joined: 02 Nov 2003
Posts: 20778
City/Region: Pensacola
State or Province: FL
C-Dory Year: 2007
C-Dory Model: 25 Cruiser
Vessel Name: thataway
Photos: Thataway
PostPosted: Thu May 04, 2017 11:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

BOE Marine and International Marine do have group buys for folks on The Hull Truth periodically for safety gear. Also Thru Active Captain, there are Defender specials. Some really good, others only fair.

We had tried locally with West Marine to get a "group buy", but were disappointed, even though the local manager was behind the movement. Unfortunately there is not a lot of profit margin on marine electronics.

As for ditch bags--I have had the same SealLine "dry bag" for many years. It still is totally sealed and will float when filled with gear and enough air. The problem I have with the ACR Ditch bag (which I owned) was that it was not waterproof. I feel that any good ditch bag needs to be waterproof. I carry survival gear, as well as the electronic notification devices.

Although we carried two EPRIBs on our long distance cruising boats, we feel that PLB are more than enough for the C Dory's. They are small enough that they are easily put on one's life jacket or pocket. We have 3; one for each of us, and one in the ditch bag. Same with the waterproof radios (including a Standard Horizon HX 870 with DSC and GPS. That,plus the one in our ditch bag has alkaline battery trays, for use if the NiCad or Lithium rechargeable dies, we have another source of power for the radio.

_________________
Bob Austin
Thataway
Thataway (Ex Seaweed) 2007 25 C Dory May 2018 to Oct. 2021
Thisaway 2006 22' CDory November 2011 to May 2018
Caracal 18 140 Suzuki 2007 to present
Thataway TomCat 255 150 Suzukis June 2006 thru August 2011
C Pelican; 1992, 22 Cruiser, 2002 thru 2006
Frequent Sea; 2003 C D 25, 2007 thru 2009
KA6PKB
Home port: Pensacola FL
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Peter & Judy



Joined: 03 Dec 2014
Posts: 546
City/Region: Olds
State or Province: AB
C-Dory Year: 2005
C-Dory Model: 22 Cruiser
Vessel Name: Mistaya
Photos: Mistaya
PostPosted: Thu May 04, 2017 8:11 pm    Post subject: Tofino boaters monitoring Channel 68, not 16 Reply with quote

Another article from CBC. It seems that search and rescue by local boaters in the Tofino area was delayed due to the fact that most of them were monitoring Channel 68 and the Coast Guard Call for assistance was made on Channel 16. So, many boaters missed the distress call and were unaware that there was an emergency and thus unable to offer assistance.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/tofino-emergency-callout-did-not-broadcast-on-popular-channel-1.4096454

_________________
Peter & Judy Haase
Buffalo Horn Ranch

HMCB Mistaya
"Mistaya" (Grizzly Bear in Cree)
HMCB (Her Majesties Cute Boat)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
colbysmith



Joined: 02 Oct 2011
Posts: 4522
City/Region: Madison
State or Province: WI
C-Dory Year: 2009
C-Dory Model: 25 Cruiser
Vessel Name: C-Traveler
Photos: C-Traveler and Midnight-Flyer
PostPosted: Thu May 04, 2017 9:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Does Canada have the same requirements to monitor 16 that the US does? Would be good info to know for when boating in Canadian waters. Colby
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Saxe Point



Joined: 24 Jan 2012
Posts: 77
City/Region: Sooke
State or Province: BC
PostPosted: Thu May 04, 2017 9:31 pm    Post subject: Re: Tofino boaters monitoring Channel 68, not 16 Reply with quote

Peter & Judy wrote:
Another article from CBC. It seems that search and rescue by local boaters in the Tofino area was delayed due to the fact that most of them were monitoring Channel 68 and the Coast Guard Call for assistance was made on Channel 16. So, many boaters missed the distress call and were unaware that there was an emergency and thus unable to offer assistance.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/tofino-emergency-callout-did-not-broadcast-on-popular-channel-1.4096454


That's the article I was referring to (and tried to include) in my earlier post.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
thataway



Joined: 02 Nov 2003
Posts: 20778
City/Region: Pensacola
State or Province: FL
C-Dory Year: 2007
C-Dory Model: 25 Cruiser
Vessel Name: thataway
Photos: Thataway
PostPosted: Thu May 04, 2017 11:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

SOLAS requires a radio watch on 16, if you have the radio...
From Transport Canada:
Quote:
Radio Watch

Vessels that must carry VHF equipment must begin radio watch on 156.8 MHz (channel 16) at least 15 minutes before getting under way, and continue until at anchor or moored. If you choose to carry MF (medium frequency) and VHF equipment, you should try to keep watch on both 2182 kHz (MF) and 156.8 MHz (VHF) (channel 16) when at sea, to ensure that distress, urgency or safety communications will be heard and answered by as many stations as possible.


From US CG web site on Radio watch keeping:

Quote:
Radio Watchkeeping Regulations

In general, any vessel equipped with a VHF marine radiotelephone (whether voluntarily or required to) must maintain a watch on channel 16 (156.800 MHz) whenever the radiotelephone is not being used to communicate.......
Sequential monitoring techniques (scanners) alone cannot be used to meet this ...

Source: FCC 47 CFR §§ 80.148, 80.310, NTIA Manual 8.2.29.6.c(2)(e), ITU RR 31.18, 52.244


ITU:

Quote:
International Telecommunications Union (ITU). ITU regulates all use of radio spectrum by any person or vessel outside U.S. waters. ITU rules affecting radio, which have treaty status in the U.S. and most other nations, are published in the ITU Radio Regulations. The ITU has established three VHF marine radio channels recognized worldwide for safety purposes:
• Channel 16 (156.800 MHz) - Distress, safety and calling
• Channel 13 (156.650 MHz) - Intership navigation (bridge-to-bridge)
• Channel 70 (156.525 MHz) - Digital Selective Calling


I believe that under international treaty that all vessels which are quipped with VHF Radio should monitor it...is someone going to arrest you? No, but how would you feel if you were near a vessel in distress and did not help when you could have?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
hardee



Joined: 30 Oct 2006
Posts: 12632
City/Region: Sequim
State or Province: WA
C-Dory Year: 2005
C-Dory Model: 22 Cruiser
Vessel Name: Sleepy-C
Photos: SleepyC
PostPosted: Fri May 05, 2017 12:00 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Saxe Point wrote:
Sadly, this article highlights how more attention should be paid to well established safety practices to avoid confusion, delays and errors.

Instead of querying why there wasn't an "all channels" mayday relay, or a mayday relay on the locally used channel (6Cool, the real question is why weren't the other boats monitoring channel 16. To me, monitoring 16 is a moral obligation rooted in fairness and a sense of helping one another: if I want people to help me in an emergency, I must reciprocate. The coast guard explained in this article why 16 is the distress channel.

On another level, as has been mentioned already, a DSC emergency call would possibly have made a difference. That would have pulled all the VHF radios in range in and amounted to the "all channels" call that was referred to. But, again sadly, that does not appear to have happened.

[/url]http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/tofino-emergency-callout-did-not-broadcast-on-popular-channel-1.4096454[url][/url]


There are lots of good points brought up here but the one about using a priority 16 monitoring mode is good. A personal PLB is also good. Always wearing your PFD, (and with your own registered PLB) even better.

Personally, I feel strong enough about monitoring 16, that I installed a separate VHF just for that purpose, (an ICOM M-506), because with it I can not only moniter 16, but it has a 2 minute last call recording cpabiliy mode. That radio rarely leaves 16.

The loss of life is sad, but we all make choices, and sometimes after making bad choices, we get bit.

Harvey
SleepyC Moon

_________________
Though in our sleep we are not conscious of our activity or surroundings, we should not, in our wakefulness, be unconscious of our sleep.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Saxe Point



Joined: 24 Jan 2012
Posts: 77
City/Region: Sooke
State or Province: BC
PostPosted: Fri May 05, 2017 12:20 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

colbysmith wrote:
Does Canada have the same requirements to monitor 16 that the US does? Would be good info to know for when boating in Canadian waters. Colby


I'm no expert and the answer might be complicated, having studied and looked at some of the Canadian laws and regulations when I got my marine VHF license. And what laws apply to American pleasure boaters in our waters is also not something that I have the time to delve into. But this site provides some information on VHF radio requirements, particularly for Americans boating in Canadian waters: http://boating.ncf.ca/canadaborder.html#fcc

The biggest difference between the US and Canada as far as pleasure boat VHF radio is concerned seems to be that in Canada, one needs a license to operate one lawfully. I took the course and exam. In the US, I don't believe pleasure boaters need a license to operate a marine VHF radio

To the best of my knowledge, in neither the US nor Canada are pleasure boaters (smaller than a certain i.e. very large size) required to even have a VHF radio on board. Similarly, I don't think that maintaining a listening watch of any kind is a legal requirement for pleasure boaters. Things are obviously very different for non-pleasure boaters, at least in Canada and I expect in the US as well. Commercial vessels are intensely regulated and I expect that radios and listening watches are legally required.

To me, the issue for pleasure boaters is not the existence of any legal requirement for a channel 16 listening watch, but rather the importance that boaters should place on the moral or ethical requirement to maintain a watch. As I said in my earlier post, I share the risks of boating with all boaters. If I want help from nearby boaters with VHF radios if the risk crystallizes into a problem, I think it only just and right that I listen and act to help a fellow boater whose risk crystallizes. Shared mutual assistance seems like a simple code of conduct that all boaters should adhere to, in my opinion.

The practical enforceability of a legal listening watch requirement, even if there was one, is so low that all we can really count on is the good faith that boaters will share the sense that we are all in this together and that, if a problem arises, we will help each other out as best we can.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rogerbum



Joined: 21 Nov 2004
Posts: 5922
City/Region: Kenmore
State or Province: WA
C-Dory Year: 2008
C-Dory Model: 255 Tomcat
Vessel Name: Meant to be
Photos: SeaDNA
PostPosted: Sun May 07, 2017 9:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

thataway wrote:
<stuff clipped>
I certainly agree,--why were most of the other boats on Chanel 68?

They were on 68 since that is a channel most of the fishermen in the area use and many fishermen are more interested in fish intel than in monitoring 16. I agree that they have a legal (and more importantly, moral) responsibility to monitor channel 16. But many don't. Even with a radio operator's license, many don't seem to understand the need/requirement to monitor 16.
thataway wrote:

They expected the CG to put out an "All channels" broadcast of the distress. In the USA I am not aware of an "All Channels" protocol.

This speaks for having the radio priority on 16 and use dual watch for monitoring 68. Again, the Distress DSC will not work unless the boat has an MMSI number programed into the radio. Then there would have been an alert to other boats.


I doubt anyone really expected an "All channels" broadcast. Personally, I have one radio set to monitor 16 and the other scans a number of the local "fishing channels". Many don't even know how to set up their radio to scan so they make the choice to get the information that they think is most useful to them at the time.

_________________
Roger on Meant to be
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
AstoriaDave



Joined: 31 Oct 2005
Posts: 994
City/Region: Astoria
State or Province: OR
PostPosted: Sun May 07, 2017 11:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Roger has pointed out the practical realities of simultaneously monitoring two channels with one radio. Charter boats here typically use cell phones or a dedicated VHF channel for boat to boat info exchange ... for fish Intel primarily. Diverting attention from their own financial interests is a difficult task. Mandating use of dual radios (not dual scan capability in one radio) for commercial craft to achieve full time monitoring of 16 may help. Pleasure craft likely would never sustain two radios, even if "required."
_________________
Dave Kruger
Astoria, OR
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
thataway



Joined: 02 Nov 2003
Posts: 20778
City/Region: Pensacola
State or Province: FL
C-Dory Year: 2007
C-Dory Model: 25 Cruiser
Vessel Name: thataway
Photos: Thataway
PostPosted: Mon May 08, 2017 12:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

In the Puget Sound area, and toward Vancouver, small craft are encouraged to not only monitor 16, but also 13, 14 and 5a due to traffic schemes.

One can buy a hand held VHF radio (which every boat should have at least one aboard) for as low as $60! Pretty small price to pay for safety.

Several times when we were on the outside of Vancouver Island with the Cal 46, we responded to distress calls, relayed by lighthouses on Channel 16. In at least one case, after powering 5 hours @ 6 knots to reach the vessel in distress, we found other vessels fishing near the vessel in distress, who had not responded to the May Day call. I have to assume that they either didn't have radios, or had them on some channel other than 16!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Foggy



Joined: 01 Aug 2013
Posts: 1518
City/Region: Traverse City; Northern Lake Michigan
State or Province: MI
C-Dory Year: 2014
C-Dory Model: 26 Venture
Vessel Name: Boatless in Boating Paradise
Photos: W B Nod
PostPosted: Mon May 08, 2017 9:14 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

For safety, if the law requires VHF Ch 16 to be monitored, are not scanners
available or have a VHF w/dedicated Ch 16 feature? Then there's DSC available
that not many use...

My experience w/Ch 68 huggers is they chat about where the fish are and what
they're biting on taking them out of the loop in case of emergency.

Aye.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
rogerbum



Joined: 21 Nov 2004
Posts: 5922
City/Region: Kenmore
State or Province: WA
C-Dory Year: 2008
C-Dory Model: 255 Tomcat
Vessel Name: Meant to be
Photos: SeaDNA
PostPosted: Mon May 08, 2017 1:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

AstoriaDave wrote:
Roger has pointed out the practical realities of simultaneously monitoring two channels with one radio. Charter boats here typically use cell phones or a dedicated VHF channel for boat to boat info exchange ... for fish Intel primarily. Diverting attention from their own financial interests is a difficult task. Mandating use of dual radios (not dual scan capability in one radio) for commercial craft to achieve full time monitoring of 16 may help. Pleasure craft likely would never sustain two radios, even if "required."

With one radio, I can scan all the channels (including 16). I just have 2 to make life easier on me (actually, I have two fixed mount radios with AIS and a couple of handhelds on board but I'm crazy with my redundancy). My main point was that a) many don't really know how to set the radio up to scan so they sit on 68 for the info they care about and b) many care more about fishing than the occasional a rare safety needs of others. These are the same people who might drive right past a car accident or a domestic violence scene without calling police or getting involved in any way. That's just an unfortunate reality.

We here on the C-Brats are better than that. Also, by discussing events like this one, we can learn and think about how we might respond in the future. Do we have the appropriate gear on you boat so you could assist in a rescue? Have we practiced a mock rescue? etc. Topics like this are great since we all learn something. In this case, one of the things to learn is that we can't count on other boaters to be monitoring 16 and to respond. I guess another thing I learned is that maybe when I hear a distress call on 16, I should relay it on ch 68 and encourage those on 68 to tune in to 16.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
thataway



Joined: 02 Nov 2003
Posts: 20778
City/Region: Pensacola
State or Province: FL
C-Dory Year: 2007
C-Dory Model: 25 Cruiser
Vessel Name: thataway
Photos: Thataway
PostPosted: Mon May 08, 2017 2:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

There is another reason I suggest two radios (one can be that hand held, although you will have a bit shorter reception range). With dual watch or scan, many of the fisherman on 68 (for example) are talking most of the time, and will over-ride the distress calls on 16. This is were DSC (if you could get them to secure and enter an MMSI #) would come to its own. If the boat in distress activates a DSC call it will over-ride their 68 conversation so it is useful even if they are chatting. Many times fishermen use channels other than 68 and may use scramblers.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
hardee



Joined: 30 Oct 2006
Posts: 12632
City/Region: Sequim
State or Province: WA
C-Dory Year: 2005
C-Dory Model: 22 Cruiser
Vessel Name: Sleepy-C
Photos: SleepyC
PostPosted: Mon May 08, 2017 5:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Just want to say I agree with Rogerbum and Thataway. Having 2 vhf radios makes it easy and you won't miss something while a single radio is doing the scan.

I don't get piad by ICOM but I often recommend their M 506 vjf with AIS and last call, 2 min recirding. That is one of the radios I have on board, and it almost never leaves chan 16.

A handheld vhf and a PLB are great safety adjuncts. Worth the investment ( in your safety).

Harvey
SleepyC Moon
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    The C-Brats Forum Index -> Boating Safety All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Page 2 of 3

 
     Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum



Page generation time: 0.1248s (PHP: 86% - SQL: 14%) - SQL queries: 33 - GZIP disabled - Debug on