The C-Brats Forum Index
HomeForumsMy TopicsCalendarEvent SignupsMemberlistOur C-DorysThe Brat MapPhotos

Bay Star vs. Sea Star on 22 Cruiser: Understanding the diffs
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    The C-Brats Forum Index -> Motor Control Systems
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Sunbeam



Joined: 23 Feb 2012
Posts: 3990
City/Region: Out 'n' About
State or Province: Other
C-Dory Year: 2002
C-Dory Model: 22 Cruiser
Photos: Sunbeam
PostPosted: Sat Jan 04, 2014 3:46 pm    Post subject: Bay Star vs. Sea Star on 22 Cruiser: Understanding the diffs Reply with quote

In a classic example of "it's all connected," the tidying up of wiring behind the helm is leading me to want to replace my Teleflex cable steering with hydraulic steering (this isn't the only reason - I have others - but if I am going to replace it, it makes sense to arrange the tidied wiring around the new steering vs. the big ol' lump of Teleflex that is behind the helm now).

My current decision is.... Bay Star or Sea Star. I see that Bay Star is fully adequate (22 Cruiser with usual size single main engine), and that Sea Star can also work and is "above" the Bay Star in the model hierarchy. What I want to fully understand before choosing is the differences and the pro's and cons of each. From what I think I know now (although I'm not completely clear on these things):

Bay Star

1) Adequate although "below" Sea Star.
2) May have lines that are easier to cut to size?
3) Has steering arm style in splashwell that is smaller/tidier - something about which part moves and which part is fixed...
4) Has available inset/angled mount, but no tilt option.

Sea Star
1) More robust for 22 (although Bay Star may be perfectly adequate).
2) May have lines that are somehow more complicated to cut to size (?)
3) Has steering arm in splashwell that works "opposite" to Bay Star and may be less compact/tidy in operation?
4) Can be had with tilt steering option.

Thoughts:

1) Although I'm all for heavy-duty, if it's not needed then it may not matter.
2) I don't mind a bit more fuss during installation if there is a good reason for it; at least it only happens once.
3) I would like to understand this - and its ramifications - better, as the splashwell is already "busy" in my 22.
4) I don't really tend to actively use a tilt wheel, so it would be more just to have options as to where to "set it" initially. I may not need that if the inset/fixed-angle on the Bay Star suits me... but of course how do I know that in advance?

Can anyone point me to splashwell photos of a Sea Star system in a 22 with a single main? That seems to be a less "usual" choice so harder to find in the albums without knowing what I am looking for.

Open to any other comments as well.

Thanks,
Sunbeam
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
srbaum



Joined: 30 Aug 2010
Posts: 875
City/Region: Portsmouth
State or Province: VA
C-Dory Year: 2007
C-Dory Model: 26 Venture
Vessel Name: Osprey
Photos: Osprey
PostPosted: Sat Jan 04, 2014 4:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sunbeam,
Here is a photo of my SeaStar ram in the splashwell.

http://www.c-brats.com/modules.php?set_albumName=album1847&id=photo5&op=modload&name=gallery&file=index&include=view_photo.php

My Rigid Hull Inflatable has the BayStar system. I'll take a photo and send it for comparison. The ram seal failed on this unit when I was off shore...I had to hand steer the 90 Honda to get home. I will be changing it to a SeaStar or a Ultraflex this spring, as I have repaired the ram and the helm more than 4 times.

_________________
Steve Baum
Homeport of Portsmouth, VA
OSPREY (Ex Mister Sea) 2000 22 C-Dory 2010 - Sold 3/19
OSPREY (Ex ADITI) 2007 26 Cape Cruiser 2018
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Wefings
Dealer


Joined: 29 Nov 2005
Posts: 2086
City/Region: Panhandle
State or Province: FL
Photos: Cruise Ship #4
PostPosted: Sat Jan 04, 2014 4:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Tons of problems with Bay Star , go Sea Star.
Don't cheap out on steering ..............
Marc

_________________
Wefings Marine Website
Since 1909
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
AK Angler



Joined: 18 Nov 2003
Posts: 327
City/Region: South Central
State or Province: AK
C-Dory Year: 2007
C-Dory Model: 26 Venture
Vessel Name: Rod Holder
Photos: Rod Holder
PostPosted: Sat Jan 04, 2014 4:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Wefings wrote:
Tons of problems with Bay Star , go Sea Star.
Don't cheap out on steering ..............
Marc

Sorry, Marc... gonna hafta provide more info than that.

What exactly does 'tons of problems' mean?
What exactly are the problems? (bad install, maybe? abuse? used beyond rated capacity? random parts failure? just plain wear out?)



I'm not advocating for one over the other. But, I have a BayStar system that's been operating just fine for ... seven (?) years on my Arima, and it has even had the cylinder reconfigured to work with a different motor (repowered in early 2012). It's been 100% maintenance-free since day one, except for the recommended lubing of the tilt-tube rods. Maybe I got a good one??? Or maybe it's just a matter of time before these 'problems' start cropping up???

_________________
-Rod



89CD16A- The Navicula has been sold...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Wefings
Dealer


Joined: 29 Nov 2005
Posts: 2086
City/Region: Panhandle
State or Province: FL
Photos: Cruise Ship #4
PostPosted: Sat Jan 04, 2014 4:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yes you are lucky, most of the systems fail by leakage at the cylinder within a year to a year and a half.
The sea star system is much more robust and suited for a saltwater application. We use our boats year around here in Florida and we have seen many cylinders fail at a year.
also the bigger the engine the quicker they will fail.
Marc
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Sunbeam



Joined: 23 Feb 2012
Posts: 3990
City/Region: Out 'n' About
State or Province: Other
C-Dory Year: 2002
C-Dory Model: 22 Cruiser
Photos: Sunbeam
PostPosted: Sat Jan 04, 2014 4:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Wefings wrote:
Tons of problems with Bay Star , go Sea Star.
Don't cheap out on steering


Thanks for the input - I too, would like to hear any specifics, just to understand it better. Just to clarify - and I perhaps should have mentioned this in my first post: This isn't about price at all. It's about which one will work out better all things considered. I mean sure, if two things are identical then spending less money is good. But other than that, I'm more interested in how they fit on my boat, how they look (tidy or not), details of installation, helm comfort, etc. Price, within reason, is secondary.

Sunbeam
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
AK Angler



Joined: 18 Nov 2003
Posts: 327
City/Region: South Central
State or Province: AK
C-Dory Year: 2007
C-Dory Model: 26 Venture
Vessel Name: Rod Holder
Photos: Rod Holder
PostPosted: Sat Jan 04, 2014 6:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Wefings wrote:
...most of the systems fail by leakage at the cylinder within a year to a year and a half...


If you're implying that 'most BayStar systems fail', I'd like to see some data to back that up. (Again, my single data point does not fit that trend, but I know it's just one single data point.)

If you mean that 'most Baystar failures are leaky cylinders', that's an entirely different thing.

Certainly, cylinders that start leaking in 12-18 months is an issue. But, bad seals can be replaced, no? I wonder if there was just a bad batch of seals? I just can't see how the boating world would 'allow' a product to remain on the market if "most" of the units failed within 18 months? Bad reputations are hard to shake. I'd think that the manufacturer would be forced to either redesign their system, or just quit making their unreliable product altogether, and instead focus on their superior one.

I'm really not trying to be argumentative here. I'm just looking for non-anecdotal information. Because, a couple of quick google searches seem to turn up just as many discussions regarding leaking SeaStar systems as there are leaking BayStar systems.

And - for the record - my Baystar system is also used year 'round in the salt. In fact, I spent the week before Thanksgiving, as well as all of last week plying the waters of Prince William Sound hunting blacktail deer. And, I'd think that boating in the cold Alaskan winters would be a pretty good test of the system's integrity. Still - no problems, even being seven years old.

Wefings wrote:
...also the bigger the engine the quicker they will fail...

Maybe this is the issue...? I know the BayStar is factory rated for up to 150 horsepower outboards. But, maybe that's just too much. (Both of the motors I've had mine on are 90-hp units.)

Of course, it could really be that I've just been lucky... Who knows Question
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
thataway



Joined: 02 Nov 2003
Posts: 20803
City/Region: Pensacola
State or Province: FL
C-Dory Year: 2007
C-Dory Model: 25 Cruiser
Vessel Name: thataway
Photos: Thataway
PostPosted: Sat Jan 04, 2014 7:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

If I was out fitting a boat and switching to a hydraulic system, I would go with Sea Star. Go over to The Hull Truth, and see where many failures of the Bay Star are documented. I do have a Bay Star on my 18 foot Caracal. It works, and is "adequate". The boat is lighter than A C Dory, although the engine is larger. The C Dory has the Sea Star. The difference in cost is about $250. The hoses on the Sea Star are more robust as is the cylinder and pump at the helm.
_________________
Bob Austin
Thataway
Thataway (Ex Seaweed) 2007 25 C Dory May 2018 to Oct. 2021
Thisaway 2006 22' CDory November 2011 to May 2018
Caracal 18 140 Suzuki 2007 to present
Thataway TomCat 255 150 Suzukis June 2006 thru August 2011
C Pelican; 1992, 22 Cruiser, 2002 thru 2006
Frequent Sea; 2003 C D 25, 2007 thru 2009
KA6PKB
Home port: Pensacola FL
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Barry Rietz



Joined: 21 Jun 2006
Posts: 409
City/Region: Sierra Vista
State or Province: AZ
PostPosted: Sat Jan 04, 2014 7:22 pm    Post subject: Hydraulic Steering Reply with quote

Sunbeam, Since you are going to replace the complete steering system have a look at the "Wagner 700 Series" small vessel application. This system allows for adding second "stations" by just splicing into the lines. They also have a small simple "auto-pilot" pump application if required.
_________________
Barry Rietz
N9DXC
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
AK Angler



Joined: 18 Nov 2003
Posts: 327
City/Region: South Central
State or Province: AK
C-Dory Year: 2007
C-Dory Model: 26 Venture
Vessel Name: Rod Holder
Photos: Rod Holder
PostPosted: Sat Jan 04, 2014 7:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

thataway wrote:
... Go over to The Hull Truth, and see where many failures of the Bay Star are documented. ...


You mean like these threads at The Hull Truth?

Oh, wait. Those threads are all about failures of SeaStar systems... Rolling Eyes


Sure, the SeaStar system is supposed to be more 'robust', since it's rated for use on greater horsepower outboards. And, the rubber hoses are probably easier to install than the plastic tubing of the BayStar system (but it's not that bad, and you only have to do it once). And, there may be other advantages to buying the SS over the BS, like the ability to use their kicker cable tie bar. But, I'm just not convinced that - for the typical C-Doty installation - any extra 'robustness' is necessary. Desirable? Maybe. Necessary? I just don't know. And if it were my money, I'd be hard pressed to spend the extra $250 unless there was some actual evidence that the more expensive system actually performed better. Just my opinion. And probably worth what you paid for it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Captains Cat



Joined: 03 Nov 2003
Posts: 7313
City/Region: Cod Creek>Potomac River>Chesapeake Bay
State or Province: VA
C-Dory Year: 2005
C-Dory Model: 22 Cruiser
Vessel Name: Captain's Choice II
Photos: Captain's Cat
PostPosted: Sat Jan 04, 2014 8:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

AKA, just out of curiosity, what steering do you have on the 26'?

Charlie

_________________
CHARLIE and PENNY CBRAT #100
Captain's Cat II 2005 22 Cruiser
Thataway (2006 TC255 - Sold Aug 2013)
Captain's Cat (2006 TC255 - Sold January 2012)
Captain's Kitten (1995 CD 16 Angler- Sold June 2010)
Captain's Choice (1994 CD 22 Cruiser- Sold Jun 2007)
Potomac River/Chesapeake Bay
K4KBA
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Sunbeam



Joined: 23 Feb 2012
Posts: 3990
City/Region: Out 'n' About
State or Province: Other
C-Dory Year: 2002
C-Dory Model: 22 Cruiser
Photos: Sunbeam
PostPosted: Sat Jan 04, 2014 9:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

srbaum wrote:
Here is a photo of my SeaStar ram in the splashwell.


Here is that photo (thanks!):



I would like to compare this to a Baystar, and I would like understand the difference about what moves and does not move with the two systems (apparently in one the ram moves differently than the other, and I believe for some related reason Les from EQ liked the Bay Star; I want to understand this, so I can make an informed decision for myself). I'm still open to either one at the moment, and also still not sure I completely understand the differences (which is why I started this thread).

Thanks to all for the input so far - and more is welcome.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
AK Angler



Joined: 18 Nov 2003
Posts: 327
City/Region: South Central
State or Province: AK
C-Dory Year: 2007
C-Dory Model: 26 Venture
Vessel Name: Rod Holder
Photos: Rod Holder
PostPosted: Sat Jan 04, 2014 9:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Captains Cat - I have the SeaStar system on the 26-footer. It certainly makes sense in that case, as the twin Honda 90's exceed the Baystar's 150-hp max rating.

But, based on my seven years of experience using the BayStar system on my Arima's 90-hp motors, I'm just not convinced that the more expensive SeaStar system is necessary for similarly mid-powered boats - like Sunbeams 80-horse Yammie.

Of course, if somebody wants to spend the extra money, they certainly can. There's definitely something to be said for doing what makes you feel comfortable, even if that added comfort costs a bit more.

And, if there is a documented difference in reliability, that would also be a big concern. But, while there are folks that are quick to point out that there have been failures with the BayStar system, they seem to ignore all the similar SeaStar failures. That - I just don't get.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Hunkydory



Joined: 28 Mar 2005
Posts: 2657
City/Region: Cokeville, Wyoming
State or Province: WY
C-Dory Year: 2000
C-Dory Model: 22 Cruiser
Vessel Name: Hunkydory
Photos: Hunkydory-Jay-and-Jolee
PostPosted: Sat Jan 04, 2014 11:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I have to concur with AKA about the Bay Star being more than adequate for the 22 C-dory. With the Bay Star being rated for 150 hp, I couldn't see where my twin Honda 40's would stress it. I had it installed in July of 2005 & now have 900 hours on it & three major Alaska cruises without any leaks or other problems other than having to re tighten fittings at the ram following bleeding air from working on the auto pilot & having to reverse the hoses put on back wards to the ram by the installer. Those incorrect connections to the ram made for some exciting docking the first time I launched on Yellowstone lake following the installation.

Jay

_________________
Jay and Jolee 2000 22 CD cruiser Hunkydory
I will not waste my days in trying to prolong them------Jack London
https://share.delorme.com/JuliusByers
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
SEA3PO



Joined: 02 Nov 2003
Posts: 1835
City/Region: Chester
State or Province: CA
C-Dory Year: 2003
C-Dory Model: 22 Cruiser
Vessel Name: SEA3PO
Photos: SEA3PO
PostPosted: Sun Jan 05, 2014 11:20 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ha ! I love it...now I will admit to hooking up my automatic trim tabs backwards.... made a hard turn and almost tipped the boat over... like an airplane doing a roll... scared the heck out of me.

I purchased all the parts for my steering system separately and I should have gone with the Sea Star Pump and the Bay Star assembly... it worked fine for years..... only reason I dislike the Bay Star helm is that the shaft seal has such a poor design... the newer Bay Star pumps have a better design seal and would not have the same problem... I don't know if I can trust it now even though it is not leaking.

I had my lines made up at a hydraulic hose supply....much less expense.
I also use synthetic steering fluid.... not the $28 a quart stuff..
Amazon sells Sea Star parts at a real discount.

Joel
SEA3PO
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    The C-Brats Forum Index -> Motor Control Systems All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Page 1 of 5

 
     Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum



Page generation time: 0.2069s (PHP: 91% - SQL: 9%) - SQL queries: 33 - GZIP disabled - Debug on