View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
thataway
Joined: 02 Nov 2003 Posts: 20812 City/Region: Pensacola
State or Province: FL
C-Dory Year: 2007
C-Dory Model: 25 Cruiser
Vessel Name: thataway
Photos: Thataway
|
Posted: Tue Jul 16, 2013 5:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
To clarify; The expensive moisture meters are subject to the same issues with metal as the in-expensive ones. _________________ Bob Austin
Thataway
Thataway (Ex Seaweed) 2007 25 C Dory May 2018 to Oct. 2021
Thisaway 2006 22' CDory November 2011 to May 2018
Caracal 18 140 Suzuki 2007 to present
Thataway TomCat 255 150 Suzukis June 2006 thru August 2011
C Pelican; 1992, 22 Cruiser, 2002 thru 2006
Frequent Sea; 2003 C D 25, 2007 thru 2009
KA6PKB
Home port: Pensacola FL |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Sunbeam
Joined: 23 Feb 2012 Posts: 3990 City/Region: Out 'n' About
State or Province: Other
C-Dory Year: 2002
C-Dory Model: 22 Cruiser
Photos: Sunbeam
|
Posted: Tue Jul 16, 2013 7:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Oops, sounds like I didn't word that well.
Yes, wholeheartedly agree, that the "proper" boat moisture meters are affected by metal, bottom paint, surface moisture, temperature, and other things. You kind of have to have a "feel" for how to read them. That said, I think they're still better than something like the Ryobi from Home Depot. BUT, the Ryobi is much better than nothing, especially if you know what you are looking for (and you pretty much do). I had a professional Skipper model available to me at home, but not where I was looking at the boat, hence the Ryobi for that one use.
I still never 100% trust any moisture meter and only *really* believe a physical sample.
Sorry for any confusion. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You cannot download files in this forum
|
|