The C-Brats Forum Index
HomeForumsMy TopicsCalendarEvent SignupsMemberlistOur C-DorysThe Brat MapPhotos

Sunbeam ~ C-Dory 22 Cruiser
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    The C-Brats Forum Index -> All C-Dorys, All The Time
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Sunbeam



Joined: 23 Feb 2012
Posts: 3990
City/Region: Out 'n' About
State or Province: Other
C-Dory Year: 2002
C-Dory Model: 22 Cruiser
Photos: Sunbeam
PostPosted: Mon Jan 21, 2013 12:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

rogerbum wrote:

Some? That sounds like all my boat projects! Laughing


Heh, yeah, I guess I was being a bit optimistic Wink And hey, this fuel vent project is not done yet - there's still time for it to go awry in a number of ways Mr. Green
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Emurph8



Joined: 23 Nov 2012
Posts: 33
City/Region: South Jersey
State or Province: NJ
C-Dory Year: 1990
C-Dory Model: 22 Cruiser
Vessel Name: Murphy's Law
Photos: Emurph8 (Name TBD)
PostPosted: Mon Jan 21, 2013 3:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I just took a good look at my set up. There I plenty of height to make. Loop but when I test fit it the 5/8 hose kinked badly in that small space. I took the fitting out and there is a 3/4" hole. The non-flush mount Atwood version would fit in the 3/4" hole? This my be my best option.
_________________
Emurph
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Sunbeam



Joined: 23 Feb 2012
Posts: 3990
City/Region: Out 'n' About
State or Province: Other
C-Dory Year: 2002
C-Dory Model: 22 Cruiser
Photos: Sunbeam
PostPosted: Mon Jan 21, 2013 4:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Emurph8 wrote:
I just took a good look at my set up. There I plenty of height to make. Loop but when I test fit it the 5/8 hose kinked badly in that small space.


Well that's not good. I don't know what type of hose you're using, but if you're already using "good stuff" and still can't make the bend without kinking than I'd probably go with the P-trap fitting. Are you starting with a 90º vent fitting or are you making the full 180º with the hose?

(Side note: I just looked up Trident A-1 hose, their type #365 and in that size they list a 3" bend radius -- in case that's better than what you have now. Here is their spec sheet on it:
http://www.tridentmarine.com/stage/documents/365A1-15FUELHOSESpecificationSheet.pdf)

Emurph8 wrote:
I took the fitting out and there is a 3/4" hole. The non-flush mount Atwood version would fit in the 3/4" hole? This my be my best option.


That's what Attwood shows on their website for the surface-mounted P-trap vent - and in this case, since that's the "usual" size hole for our size surface-mounted vents, I don't have any reason to doubt it.

Sunbeam Hot
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Emurph8



Joined: 23 Nov 2012
Posts: 33
City/Region: South Jersey
State or Province: NJ
C-Dory Year: 1990
C-Dory Model: 22 Cruiser
Vessel Name: Murphy's Law
Photos: Emurph8 (Name TBD)
PostPosted: Wed Jan 23, 2013 9:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I ordered the Atwood that fits in the 3/4" hole. Decision made. Since I will be reusing the metal fills I have to go back and ground them. Do you know what size wire I need to use for that? The old wire was white but I threw it out I don't remember what size it was. Is white the correct color? Does it matter?

Thanks!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Sunbeam



Joined: 23 Feb 2012
Posts: 3990
City/Region: Out 'n' About
State or Province: Other
C-Dory Year: 2002
C-Dory Model: 22 Cruiser
Photos: Sunbeam
PostPosted: Wed Jan 23, 2013 11:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Emurph8 wrote:
I ordered the Atwood that fits in the 3/4" hole. Decision made.


That's a good feeling, isn't it?

Emurph8 wrote:
Since I will be reusing the metal fills I have to go back and ground them. Do you know what size wire I need to use for that? The old wire was white but I threw it out I don't remember what size it was. Is white the correct color? Does it matter?


I don't know. I don't remember my (metal) fills being grounded when I removed them. I'm not sure if that's incorrect or if it's because I have plastic tanks (and the old ones were plastic too). Did you have metal tanks previously? Is that why they were grounded?

I guess I will have to check into this before I install my new tanks and reinstall my metal fills. I might have known at some point but if so I have forgotten. I can try to look it up on ABYC.

******

Okay, so on the Moeller tank installation sheet, it says this:

"PROPER WIRING INSTALLATION: (See Figure 4) - Connect sender wire from fuel gauge to the threaded screw terminal on the fuel sender. Use
attached nut and washer to secure wire in place. - Connect a grounding wire to the 1/4" fasson terminal on fuel sender."

So perhaps it's if you have fuel gauge senders (which are electrical) that you have to ground the fills? Did your previous tanks have senders? I imagine some other Brats probably know this for sure, but I don't at the moment.

Sunbeam
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Emurph8



Joined: 23 Nov 2012
Posts: 33
City/Region: South Jersey
State or Province: NJ
C-Dory Year: 1990
C-Dory Model: 22 Cruiser
Vessel Name: Murphy's Law
Photos: Emurph8 (Name TBD)
PostPosted: Thu Jan 24, 2013 5:23 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

My old tanks were plastic but they did have fuel senders. That's what started this whole project for me, the duel gauge wasn't working. If in don't need to ground the fill they would be great but I'm pretty sure it needs to be grounded due to static electricity? Ill try and find more info also.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Sunbeam



Joined: 23 Feb 2012
Posts: 3990
City/Region: Out 'n' About
State or Province: Other
C-Dory Year: 2002
C-Dory Model: 22 Cruiser
Photos: Sunbeam
PostPosted: Thu Jan 24, 2013 10:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I just read through ABYC's section H-24, which pertains to gasoline fuel systems. I think I found the answer in section 24.15, Fuel-System Grounding (although anyone who knows better please correct me):

"24.15 FUEL SYSTEM GROUNDING
Each metal or metallic plated component of the fuel fill system and fuel tank, which is in contact with the fuel, must be grounded so that its resistance to the boat's ground is less than one olnn. Wire ends shall not be clamped between the fill pipes and hose.
"

The bit that caught my eye is, "which is in contact with the fuel" (emboldening mine). I think your senders would have been in contact with the fuel, so they would have to be grounded, but our fillers are not in contact with the fuel (presuming they mean constantly, which I don't know for sure and which may change things if I'm misinterpreting it). So perhaps your senders were grounded to the fills and the purpose was to ground the former not the latter?

Sunbeam
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Bill K



Joined: 28 Sep 2012
Posts: 314
City/Region: Toledo
State or Province: OH
C-Dory Year: 1989
C-Dory Model: 22 Cruiser
Vessel Name: NIC'L PIC'L
Photos: NIC'L PIC'L
PostPosted: Thu Jan 24, 2013 10:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I believe that the filler is suppose to be grounded also because of the gas fumes and the chance of a spark between the nozzle and the filler.

I know I have always been told to keep the nozzle in contact with the filler for that reason.

Bill Kelleher
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Sunbeam



Joined: 23 Feb 2012
Posts: 3990
City/Region: Out 'n' About
State or Province: Other
C-Dory Year: 2002
C-Dory Model: 22 Cruiser
Photos: Sunbeam
PostPosted: Thu Jan 24, 2013 11:10 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Bill K wrote:
I believe that the filler is suppose to be grounded also because of the gas fumes and the chance of a spark between the nozzle and the filler.


That seems like it might be a better interpretation. I was somewhat trying to make the facts "fit" what I was reading (since mine were apparently never grounded), and "in contact with the fuel" seemed to make it plausible to wonder whether that meant IN the fuel or just ever in slight contact.

I found this on Boat U.S.'s site, which is interesting. It explains how now the rule has changed for fills with a metal cap and chain but a plastic body (does not pertain to mine which are all metal, but there is some other interesting info).

It look like my fills should be grounded, although it says "to the boat's bonding system," and of course my boat is not bonded. Guess I'll do some further research.

Edit: I have a call in to ABYC and I'll report back.


GROUNDING ESSENTIALS and a SPECIAL WARNING:

A Caution About Grounding Your Deck Fill: Please check with your installation instructions regarding grounding requirements or refer to a marina or boat yard that is versed in American Boat & Yacht Council (ABYC) construction standards.

Because fuel nozzles are metal and the flow of fuel through it generates static, a small but dangerous spark (called an Electrostatic Discharge or ESD) can occur when the nozzle is inserted into a metal filler neck. To prevent sparking, a ground wire must be attached from the metal deck fill unit to the boat’s bonding system. Also, it is important that the nozzle remain in contact with the metal deck fill at all times while refueling. Never wrap a nozzle in an absorbent pad or rag so that it prevents a good contact between the nozzle and metal body of the deck fill. When refueling portable fuel tanks, always place directly on the ground, never on a plastic truck bed-liner or a dock made of synthetic plastic wood. Good contact between a portable tank and a solid grounded object is essential.

Special Warning for Plastic Body and Metal Fuel Caps: Deck fill units that have a plastic body with metal components such as a metallic lid or metal retaining chain, are NOT to be grounded. Read the important Safely Message & Technical Bulletin issued by the United States Coast Guard (USCG) in February 2005:

Coast Guard Warning: Fuel Fill Technical Bulletin:

Recent events have caused the boating industry to examine the policy regarding the bonding of plastic body fuel fills with metallic caps and retaining chains. Existing USCG & ABYC policy states that the bonding of these components is voluntary. A study by IMANNA Laboratories has shown that connecting the metallic retaining chain and cap of a plastic body fuel fill assembly to a boats bonding system may result in electrostatic discharge from a land-based fuel pump nozzle to the metallic components of the assembly when the boat is not in the water. This condition does not exist when the boat is in the water due to the equalizations of the ground potentials between the fuel pump nozzle and the boats bonding system.

It is recommended by ABYC and the USCG that new and existing installations of this type of fuel fill assembly DO NOT INCLUDE any attachment to the boats bonding system. Existing connections should be removed from the point of connection to the boats bonding system to the fuel fill assembly. Removal of the metallic components of the assembly is not necessary; however, the U.S. Coast Guard and ABYC still require that METALLIC body fuel fills be bonded.

For further information contact:
John Adey, ABYC (410) 956-1050 ext. 29 jadey@abycinc.org
Richard Blackman (202) 267-6810 rblackman@comdt.uscg.mil


Also from USCGboating.org:

BOATBUILDER'S HANDBOOK
Manufacturer Requirements
FEDERAL LAW

183.572 - Grounding

Each metallic component of the fuel fill system and fuel tank which is in contact with fuel must be statically grounded so that the resistance between the ground and each metallic component of the fuel fill system and fuel tank is less than 100 ohms.



Fuel flowing from the dispensing nozzle into a fuel tank is a potential source of a static electric charge which could cause a spark between the dispensing nozzle and metal component of the fuel tank fill system. To prevent such a spark from occurring, metallic components of the fuel tank fill system and metallic fuel tanks must be grounded.

Grounding or bonding may be accomplished by connecting the metallic components electrically by running a wire from one component to the next, and so forth to the boat’s ground. Grounding can usually be accomplished by a connection to the common bonding conductor or the engine negative terminal.

If the fuel tank deck fill fitting is nonmetallic, and nonconductive hose is used as a fill pipe, there is no need for grounding the fill fitting. Chrome-plated plastic fill fittings are treated the same as metallic fittings.

NOTES:

If a metal hose attachment fitting is used, it must be grounded.
Fill cap retaining chains need not be grounded.
FIGURE 36 - Fuel Fill System Grounding

CAUTION

BONDING WIRES PUT UNDER THE END OF A HOSE COULD CAUSE A FUEL LEAK. The bonding wire should be a "bolted connection" on the tank’s ground tab. At the deck plate the bonding wire may be securely connected to a ground fitting provided on the deck plate, or securely connected to a deck fill plate bolt.



TO COMPLY WITH THE LAW

Are metallic components of the fuel tank fill system and the metallic fuel tank grounded?
Is the resistance between each of these metallic components, including the metallic fuel tank and ground less than 100 ohms?


Sure looks like my metal fills should have been grounded from the get-go. I'll have to figure out exactly what I should ground them to. Other 22 folks whose fills are grounded: What are they attached to? (Electrical is not my strong point.)

Thanks,
Sunbeam
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Sunbeam



Joined: 23 Feb 2012
Posts: 3990
City/Region: Out 'n' About
State or Province: Other
C-Dory Year: 2002
C-Dory Model: 22 Cruiser
Photos: Sunbeam
PostPosted: Thu Jan 24, 2013 11:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I started a new thread specifically to address the question of grounding metal fuel fills, so maybe we can have further discussion over there. Here is a link to it:

http://www.c-brats.com/viewtopic.php?p=232877#232877
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
thataway



Joined: 02 Nov 2003
Posts: 20808
City/Region: Pensacola
State or Province: FL
C-Dory Year: 2007
C-Dory Model: 25 Cruiser
Vessel Name: thataway
Photos: Thataway
PostPosted: Thu Jan 24, 2013 1:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I believe the "Federal law" applies to commercial, and inspected craft.
_________________
Bob Austin
Thataway
Thataway (Ex Seaweed) 2007 25 C Dory May 2018 to Oct. 2021
Thisaway 2006 22' CDory November 2011 to May 2018
Caracal 18 140 Suzuki 2007 to present
Thataway TomCat 255 150 Suzukis June 2006 thru August 2011
C Pelican; 1992, 22 Cruiser, 2002 thru 2006
Frequent Sea; 2003 C D 25, 2007 thru 2009
KA6PKB
Home port: Pensacola FL
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Sunbeam



Joined: 23 Feb 2012
Posts: 3990
City/Region: Out 'n' About
State or Province: Other
C-Dory Year: 2002
C-Dory Model: 22 Cruiser
Photos: Sunbeam
PostPosted: Thu Jan 24, 2013 1:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

thataway wrote:
I believe the "Federal law" applies to commercial, and inspected craft.


I think that's correct also -- I should have clarified that I was just trying to get to the bottom of what I should have for safety. I have summarized a contact I just had with Brian from ABYC in the other thread.

Sunbeam
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Sunbeam



Joined: 23 Feb 2012
Posts: 3990
City/Region: Out 'n' About
State or Province: Other
C-Dory Year: 2002
C-Dory Model: 22 Cruiser
Photos: Sunbeam
PostPosted: Thu Jan 24, 2013 2:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Back to (other) projects on my boat. Having a very frustrating morning, so I'm probably venting as much as anything Angry
I've been epoxying for around 15 years now, and I've never had a failure. I chalk that up to being careful and tidy as I mix, apply, etc. Well, now I've experienced my first problem, and I'm in the midst of laboriously scraping it all off Cry Taking a break now to rest my hands and wrists. I'll relate the tale in case it helps someone else.

So, there is one of those "known" facts that gelcoat (polyester) doesn't stick to epoxy. And there are many times one makes a repair with epoxy (it has superior secondary bonding characteristics among other things), but then wants to gelcoat over it. I had read an article by the Gougeons (WEST System) that said they had done quite a bit of testing (and they typically do good test procedures) and found that it could bond just fine. They said the epoxy should be well-cured.

So okay, I have quite a few areas that I have epoxied that are waiting for gelcoat. "Well-cured' seemed a bit vague (days? weeks? months?) so I called WEST's technical department. They said probably more like days/weeks, not months, and then said that another factor was that it would help to have the resin mixed slightly resin-rich, or at least certainly not hardener rich. Apparently it is free particles of hardener (that are extra and have not linked with resin) that can cause bonding issues with gelcoat. So they said I could hedge my bets by mixing the batch slightly resin rich.

Okay, this felt a bit scary, but it made sense, so I mixed up a batch that was purposely slightly resin rich. I happened to be low on fast or medium hardener, so I used slow (it's 60-ish here). I also mixed in some of WEST's 501 white pigment, at just about the maximum recommended, since I was going over some maroon microballoon faired areas, and was going to overcoat with light-colored gelcoat. Then I painted it on as a last, resin-rich, sort of "tie coat" on my new bilge sump (which I planned to write about with photos when it was done).

Since the batch was not kicking any time soon (slow hardener), I used it to coat a number of other areas that I will be gelcoating (mostly disused fastener holes), and then, since I still had some left, did a little more "bonus' work in the anchor locker. You can probably guess where this is going...

Next day.... hadn't cured. Well okay, it's slow hardener and it was cool overnight. Next day.... started to get a bit worried. Next day.... called tech support again, and they recommended using a space heater to heat the area up well for 12 hours or so. I did that yesterday and last night. Now, it's not that it wasn't curing at all - it did get past the tacky/sticky stage - but it just didn't ever get totally rock hard. I could still make a mark with a fingernail edge. And my leftover inch in the cup was still "smooshable." This morning...... still the same. Okay, so now it has been five days, and I'm pretty sure my problem is not going to go away. But I still wanted to understand it better. I called WEST's tech line again (by the way, I did also explain to them that since I'm on the road, it's hard to carry and deal with the pumps, so I'm using 2:1 System Three resin, but did use WEST 501 white tint, and I have used lots of WEST resin over the years; they said System Three is a fine product too and were very gracious about it).

We went along talking through the job, and when I got to the part about the tinting a light bulb came on. They explained to me that the tinting is basically a resin too, just tinted white. So apparently between the tinting and also mixing resin rich, instead of about 10% resin rich my batch was 20% or so resin rich, and my resin simply ran out of hardener to cross link to and stopped hardening Cry I did say that I wished that were more clear on the tinting instructions, as I would then have allowed for it (they list a ratio of tint to resin, which I followed, but it was not clear that it IS resin, so you are already making a resin-rich batch -- in case you are changing the ratio in some other way as I was).

So today I'm scraping and sanding all that 501-tinted epoxy back off. It got just hard enough to be a real BEAR to remove. Sigh. Taking a hand break now. Eventually I'll be back to where I was before I added it, and then it will be fine, but for now it's discouraging.

Sunbeam

PS: I did also find out about a potentially useful resin product: I also called System Three's tech line, and they mentioned that they have an epoxy resin specifically for gelcoating over. It's their SB-112, and interestingly it says not only that it can be gelcoated over, but that it MUST be gelcoated over within 48 hours (if one is going to). That suggests some kind of "tie" action. I've always been "old-fashioned' in that I just buy the basic epoxy resin and hardener, and mix my own compounds with basic fillers and etc. -- but I may have to give this a try since I now have a boat with gleaming gelcoat.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Sunbeam



Joined: 23 Feb 2012
Posts: 3990
City/Region: Out 'n' About
State or Province: Other
C-Dory Year: 2002
C-Dory Model: 22 Cruiser
Photos: Sunbeam
PostPosted: Thu Jan 24, 2013 7:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think I have enough energy left to say...

It's gone. Off my boat. Whew! The coating on the bilge sump; all the little dabs I put on filled holes; and the nicely shaped fillet, cloth tape, and coating in the anchor locker (not the drain hole section, which was done before). Removed, sanded, cleaned up, and tools put away. Glad that's over with (well, except for re-doing what I set out to do in the first place, but that will almost seem fun compared to this!).

Luckily a friend was around, and when I was at my lowest, commiserated by saying, "I know how you feel. There have been times I just wanted to walk along the midline of the boat with a chainsaw, and simply cut it up." Ha, that made me laugh (how did he know?!) (He also gave me a hand getting some of the half-cured resin out, and touched up my chisels mid-job so I didn't have to.) Nice to have a friend around.

So okay, a bit boring and no photos, but I had to tell someone!

Sunbeam
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ferret30



Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Posts: 569
City/Region: Seattle
State or Province: WA
C-Dory Year: 2006
C-Dory Model: 22 Cruiser
Vessel Name: Lily Pad
Photos: Lily Pad
PostPosted: Thu Jan 24, 2013 7:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I have a question about the looping/p-traps used on fuel vents.

Having the loop above the vent seems fine since water entering the vent would tend to drain out.

But a P-trap type device, or a loop hanging below the vent level would cause water to be trapped in the line.

I was under the impression that one wouldn't want to use a p-trap for this purpose since you'd want free flow from the tank for venting without having to push through a trap full of water, but the gas pressure is probably sufficient.

On the other hand, it seems to me that a tank that is dropping in temperature will have lower than atmospheric pressure, causing some of the trapped water to be drawn into the tank.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    The C-Brats Forum Index -> All C-Dorys, All The Time All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next
Page 4 of 9

 
     Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum



Page generation time: 0.2658s (PHP: 51% - SQL: 49%) - SQL queries: 33 - GZIP disabled - Debug on