The C-Brats Forum Index
HomeForumsMy TopicsCalendarEvent SignupsMemberlistOur C-DorysThe Brat MapPhotos

Marinaut 215 Anchor Arrangement as configured by MBC
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    The C-Brats Forum Index -> All Marinauts, All The Time
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
C-Nile



Joined: 09 May 2008
Posts: 638
City/Region: Connecticut
State or Province: CT
C-Dory Year: 2012
Vessel Name: Betty Ann
Photos: C-Nile
PostPosted: Sun Jun 17, 2012 3:18 pm    Post subject: Marinaut 215 Anchor Arrangement as configured by MBC Reply with quote

This may seem a trivial topic, but my wife and I just spent an overnight in the Connecticut River, anchored in 10 feet of water in the Special Anchorage 1/2 mile downstream from the Goodspeed Opera House.

The anchor and chain arrangement set-up by Les and the MBC worked surprisingly well. Here is what we have: 14-pound Delta anchor, 25 feet of 1/4" HT chain, 200' of 1/2" Anchor line and a Windline BRM-2 bow roller. Here are our findings:

1) It was very easy to lower the anchor and chain into the water.

2) We did not need to set the anchor with engine reverse thrust. It set easily by hand. However, just to make sure, I had my wife give it a little reverse thrust, and the anchor did not budge.

3) We had several large boats pass by while at anchor. One boat was a large displacement cruiser that caught us broadside with 2 to 3 foot waves. Our boat rocked violently (at the same time we were trying to boil water for tea on our stove.) The anchor held fast. When we were anchored, our bow was pointing upstream, but after the tide had changed (the CT River is a tidal river,) our bow was pointing down river. The anchor continued to hold. I know this, because I set "tracks on" on my Raymarine chartplotter.

Now here is the best part. I was dreading pulling the anchor up, but it released from the mud with virtually no effort. I just propped open the anchor locker cover, pulled on the rode, and it is easily went back into the locker and the anchor came straight up the bow roller and into its resting position.

This confirms to me that did not need a windlass for New England, where the waters are shallow; we normally anchor in 10 feet of water or less. However, if we lived in the Pacific Northwest, we would not go without a windlass, because the water is so much deeper and so much more anchor rode is needed.

Thanks!

Rich

_________________
Marinaut 215 - "Betty Ann" Sept-2011
CD 16 Cruiser "C-Nile" Sold 06/2011
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bridma



Joined: 13 Sep 2011
Posts: 1155
City/Region: Comox
State or Province: BC
C-Dory Year: 2009
C-Dory Model: 22 Cruiser
Vessel Name: Nomad
Photos: Nomad
PostPosted: Sun Jun 17, 2012 8:06 pm    Post subject: Re: Marinaut 215 Anchor Arrangement as configured by MBC Reply with quote

quote <However, if we lived in the Pacific Northwest, we would not go without a windlass, because the water is so much deeper and so much more anchor rode is needed.>


@ I have had several boats in the PNW. Only one was over 30' and had a windlass (brand new). When I really needed it, the %$#&*@&$ quit. With several expletives, I ordered it to work (anyone a Fawlty Towers fan?). It refused, so I heaved it. My 22 carries a 16lb Bruce, 35' HT chain, 200' half inch rode. Never a problem, as I do scout out my anchorages and very seldom anchor in more than 50'. George on 'Kerri On' carries a 22lb Claw I believe. He installed a windlass, but knowing George he has everything set up properly.

Martin.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
ghone



Joined: 13 Aug 2008
Posts: 1428
City/Region: Nanaimo
State or Province: BC
C-Dory Year: 2011
C-Dory Model: 22 Cruiser
Vessel Name: Kerri On
Photos: Kerri On
PostPosted: Sun Jun 17, 2012 10:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks Martin. The Delta is a great anchor. Works well in a lot of areas. I have used Bruce or Claw now since Bruce first came to BC in early 1980's. In our waters we see bruce and claw a lot. The charter fleets are almost 100 percent Bruce or claw or deltas. Self setting and easy to use. The big deal we used to want on charter boats in the fleet I helped start was anchors needed to be "pinch point" free. Danforths and CQR etc. novice charterers were prone to damage fingers on anchoring some charter companies had liability issues with these. Also holding in BC bottoms was a challenge with plow type or danforth type. The 11 pound delta/ claw is fine for most instances. The 16 is better for stronger winds. I like a bit of overkill on my gear and even 22 is small to other boats so its pretty easy. We stay put with the 22 down The windlass is mostly on Kerri On because my chiropractor said "stop doing that"!!!! Repetitive hauling seems to throw the back and shoulders for a loop. Yeah I get that. Also my partner Carolyn needs to be able to retrieve the gear if I am unable for whatever reason. I use a small danforth type as stern hook or spare. The 16 pound claw and rode are stored Glad to hear you are getting on the marinuat. George
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
C-Nile



Joined: 09 May 2008
Posts: 638
City/Region: Connecticut
State or Province: CT
C-Dory Year: 2012
Vessel Name: Betty Ann
Photos: C-Nile
PostPosted: Mon Jun 18, 2012 8:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Martin,
Initially, I was going to get a windlass, but after reading the PDF instruction manual, I grew concerned about the maintenance. You certainly confirmed those concerns. I still would get a windlass if I anchored routinely in deep water, due to arthritis I have in my hands coupled with carpal tunnel syndrome.

Martin, George: If I ever lose the 14 pound anchor, perhaps I should get a 16 pounder? My anchor held fast for conditions, but neither was the wind blowing at 25 knots.

Thanks!

Rich
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ghone



Joined: 13 Aug 2008
Posts: 1428
City/Region: Nanaimo
State or Province: BC
C-Dory Year: 2011
C-Dory Model: 22 Cruiser
Vessel Name: Kerri On
Photos: Kerri On
PostPosted: Mon Jun 18, 2012 11:17 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I went the horizontal windlass due to issues i have seen or heard of seal failure with verticals. Gravity seems to want to pull grit into the workings on verticals. The horizontal is pretty trouble free. I was going to get a windlass when I got "too old" to pull the little anchor gear by hand....like when 84. My chiro suggested less back/ shoulder issues if I did it now. Good idea. It's only money. Back feels better already. I love watching that chain come aboard from the helm! The 14 is good unless you want to be off season or remote cruising then maybe up a size. I don't back down on my anchor anymore as I used to teach sailing students as with 22 lbs down there it doesn't need that. These are pretty light boats. Enjoy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Will-C



Joined: 21 Aug 2007
Posts: 2476
City/Region: Temple
State or Province: PA
C-Dory Year: 2008
C-Dory Model: 23 Venture
Vessel Name: Will-C
Photos: Will-C
PostPosted: Mon Jun 18, 2012 1:05 pm    Post subject: Marinaut 215 Anchor Arrangement as configured by MBC Reply with quote

You never know what could be in your future. We have a Lewmar VF 700 horizontal windless. We have anchored and retrieved in some fairly crowded anchorages and shallow or not a windless that you can control from inside the pilot house is the hot setup in our book. After four years a seal leaked corrosion caused our windless to malfunction. Lewmar replaced it free of charge and they explained the seals have been upgraded along with some other changes. As with most mechanical /electrical systems I would look to have the windless serviced as an every other year sort of project. I use a carabineer clip from the anchor to the bow roller bracket to hold the anchor from deploying while towing. Once we launch I remove that as I have never had the chain jump any teeth on the windless or the clutch slip unexpectedly. It's nice to be able to deploy or retrieve the anchor from the helm should the unexpected occur.. After anchoring and everythings settled down I go up to the bow and cleat it off. Our anchor is a 14 pound Lewmar knock off that has suited our needs so far as provided by Wefings. As per most C-Dory folks we have 20'/25' of chain and 200 feet of rode. Every couple months while in our driveway we soak the rode in a wash tub with some fabric softener added as the salt water enviroment can make it sort of stiff. This came as a recommondation from Jim of Wild Blue. It helps the rode soften up and lays better in the anchor locker. Some reverse the rode from the bitter end to the anchor every year if they are using a windless to prevent wear on the rode from windless use. Like Carl Malden used to say don't leave home with out, the windless that is. I mean you blow 30 to 100+ grand on boat you did not need, whats another $ 700-$1000 for windless? You might need to drop the hook in somewhere besides an anchorage of your choosing and one thats more than 10' deep.
D.D.

_________________
Chevrolet The Heart Beat Of America
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
20dauntless



Joined: 23 Jan 2008
Posts: 879
City/Region: Mercer Island and Decatur Island
State or Province: WA
C-Dory Year: 2008
C-Dory Model: 22 Cruiser
Vessel Name: Retriever and Nordic Tug 37
Photos: Retriever
PostPosted: Mon Jun 18, 2012 4:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

As a young guy I used to think that a windlass was an expensive luxury on a small boat. Then I herniated a disk in my lower back and quickly learned that back surgery is waaaaay more expensive than a windless (full disclosure...I didn't injure my back hauling the anchor). So last winter I had a windlass installed in anticipation of my trip to Alaska, and I'm sure glad I did. Anchoring in deep water is totally painless now and hauling the anchor is much quicker. And when I'm alone, it's easy to operate the gear and throttle while pulling the anchor up or setting it.
_________________
My boating blog...http://samlandsman.blogspot.com/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
C-Nile



Joined: 09 May 2008
Posts: 638
City/Region: Connecticut
State or Province: CT
C-Dory Year: 2012
Vessel Name: Betty Ann
Photos: C-Nile
PostPosted: Mon Jun 18, 2012 4:48 pm    Post subject: Re: Marinaut 215 Anchor Arrangement as configured by MBC Reply with quote

Will-C wrote:
Every couple months while in our driveway we soak the rode in a wash tub with some fabric softener added as the salt water enviroment can make it sort of stiff. You might need to drop the hook in somewhere besides an anchorage of your choosing and one thats more than 10' deep.
D.D.


D.D. -- What a great idea to keep the rode supple! With respect to where we drop anchor, it's mostly shallow -- sometimes even less than 10 feet at low tide. Also, our tidal range is not like the PNW; it's about 4 feet.

Rich
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Les Lampman
Dealer


Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 779
City/Region: Whidbey Island
State or Province: WA
PostPosted: Wed Jun 20, 2012 11:26 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks for all the good information everyone.

As in all things anchor choice is a set of compromises. I'll stand by the choice of a 14# Delta or 16.5# claw anchor for the CD22 and M215. Bigger may be better but good enough is good enough. Both boats are light and have very little windage, nothing like a sailboat or flying bridge cruiser both of which would be much heavier (even in the same size) and put far more stress on the anchoring system. Both anchors are rated for boats many times larger in terms of displacement and windage.

The next step up for the Delta after the 14-pounder is the 22-pounder and I think that's more than most folks can handle by hand standing on the bow of a small boat like the CD22 or M215, especially if the waters are not calm. Someday that windlass may (or will) quit and you want to be able to handle your ground tackle without injury.

I've tended toward the vertical windlasses to reduce the foredeck clutter, because there's more pawl/gypsy engagement with the vertical windlass (and many folks do not transfer the rode over to the cleat as should be done), and because the hawse pipe that feeds the rode into the locker is under cover on the vertical windlass and I feel it dumps less water into the locker on a small boat that sees more spray and such over the foredeck. Those that have the horizontal windlasses seem to like them just fine so I can't say that my typical recommendation is the preferred one.

That said whatever combination of things works for you on your boat is really the best choice for you. I'd be very reluctant to recommend a 9# or 11# anchor but my guess is that 95% of the time they'd work just fine. Since most folks can handle 14# to 16# it makes sense, to me, to go to that level for the main anchor. Much more than that has to be a personal choice since not everyone can handle the weight if it comes down to a 'by hand' retrieval.

_________________
Les

www.marinautboats.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
C-Nile



Joined: 09 May 2008
Posts: 638
City/Region: Connecticut
State or Province: CT
C-Dory Year: 2012
Vessel Name: Betty Ann
Photos: C-Nile
PostPosted: Wed Jun 20, 2012 1:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hello Les,

I'm certainly happy with the 14 pounder, and it's holding very well in sandy bottoms. And I agree with you -- 22 pounds as the next Delta model would be way too heavy for me.

Rich
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Sunbeam



Joined: 23 Feb 2012
Posts: 3990
City/Region: Out 'n' About
State or Province: Other
C-Dory Year: 2002
C-Dory Model: 22 Cruiser
Photos: Sunbeam
PostPosted: Wed Jun 20, 2012 5:51 pm    Post subject: Re: Marinaut 215 Anchor Arrangement as configured by MBC Reply with quote

Will-C wrote:
We have a Lewmar VF 700 horizontal windless. ... After four years a seal leaked corrosion caused our windless to malfunction. Lewmar replaced it free of charge and they explained the seals have been upgraded along with some other changes.


I'm currently windlass shopping, and trying to decide between the V700 and the H700 - so I'm curious as to which one you are referring to here (I'm confused because although you say horizontal, you have the V in the name and I couldn't find the VF).

Will-C wrote:
Like Carl Malden used to say don't leave home with out, the windless that is. I mean you blow 30 to 100+ grand on boat you did not need, whats another $ 700-$1000 for windless? You might need to drop the hook in somewhere besides an anchorage of your choosing and one thats more than 10' deep.


Just for another perspective, when I think of adding gear to the boat, I think about the possible negatives along with the positives, and if I choose not to add a given item, it's not necessarily because of the cost, and/or how it compares to the overall price of the boat.

To me, each piece of gear or system comes with not only the good but the "bad." Weight, space, cost, responsibility, and maintenance are examples of factors I consider. Having a windlass can be great (and in fact, I plan to add one within the next couple of weeks), but then too, it's another piece of equipment to maintain/repair, and it's something that can break when you need it. So while you are saying that it might be a problem to need to use a windlass and not have one, I think that conversely, there can be a time when you have one and need it but it's not functioning. So there can be an advantage to having a system you know you can easily work by hand (and have practice with), especially if you boat in areas where it's generally feasible (shallow anchorages, sheltered, etc.)

I can see why C-Nile opted for a manual system in their current use scenario, and it was interesting reading their impressions (and I can also see why others opt for a windlass).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Les Lampman
Dealer


Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 779
City/Region: Whidbey Island
State or Province: WA
PostPosted: Wed Jun 20, 2012 7:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi Sunbeam,

Great thoughts and it dovetails nicely into what I was saying earlier.

I'm one that really likes a windlass, I've pulled enough anchors to last me for awhile. However, because the CD22 and/or the M215 are not a large boats it means one can use ground tackle that can be dealt with by hand. That makes the failure of a windlass an irritation rather than a problem.

If you decide you can use a much larger anchor because you have a windlass and the windlass fails then you've got a problem rather than an irritation. For some folks that limit will be with a 14# anchor, for others maybe a 22#, and for others maybe even something larger. I think it's worthwhile to consider using the largest anchor you can retrieve by hand (unless due to physical limitations that's a very small anchor, then you're going to need to just trust your windlass).

The horizontal windlass would be the ProSeries 700 (PS700). The vertical windlass with the same specs is a V700. I think the choice is a really a personal one with good reasons to choose either. I've had good luck with the V700 but I can see why folks like the PS700 as well.

Les
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Will-C



Joined: 21 Aug 2007
Posts: 2476
City/Region: Temple
State or Province: PA
C-Dory Year: 2008
C-Dory Model: 23 Venture
Vessel Name: Will-C
Photos: Will-C
PostPosted: Thu Jun 21, 2012 8:24 am    Post subject: Marinaut 215 Anchor Arrangement as configured by MBC Reply with quote

We had a pro series 700 kit Lewmar part # 6656011107-310 Defender Marine part #1748 shows $873.85 in the 2012 catalog. But when Lewmar replaced it we got a Pro Fish model 6656211107-310 Defender Marine $972.83. Bare in mind these are kit prices which include the windless,circut breaker,raise and lower switch with a contactor which is the right way to electrically install a windless so the up and down switch is not switching full load amerage to the windless. The contactor does that; the switch just switches voltage to the coils of the contactor. The Pro Fish model can be either a free fall or have controlled decent depending on if you have the pin pushed in or out on the clutch wheel. Out the pin hits a stationary part of the windless and loosens the clutch to let anchor free fall or or on the way up the pin hits the stationary part of the windless causing the clutch to tightnen and the anchor comes up. If the pin is locked in you control up and down which is the way we use it. Both models have a five year warranty. If you are in deepwater/fisherman maybe you want free fall to get it down quick to hold over a wreck or a particular spot. That's is not the case with us. Some say free falling an anchor you stand a better chance of getting the anchor fowled.. On that day when everything is perfect and the sea is perfectly flat no rain the trip up to the bow to pull anchor can be refreshing, but when the waves are up and it's pouring rain and the trip up to the bow can be oh maybe not quite so refreshing. I don't really care if other boaters have windlesses or not. As for Carl Malden that was my ill fated attempt at humor. I know I have no control over the universe. Good Luck with your choices.
D.D.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Sunbeam



Joined: 23 Feb 2012
Posts: 3990
City/Region: Out 'n' About
State or Province: Other
C-Dory Year: 2002
C-Dory Model: 22 Cruiser
Photos: Sunbeam
PostPosted: Thu Jun 21, 2012 11:08 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks for the additional detail on your windlass. I'm currently undecided between the vertical and the horizontal Lewmars, but leaning toward the horizontal. It's nice to know they've made some improvements and I like the idea of the contactor. Also nice to know they gave you good warranty service.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
thataway



Joined: 02 Nov 2003
Posts: 20778
City/Region: Pensacola
State or Province: FL
C-Dory Year: 2007
C-Dory Model: 25 Cruiser
Vessel Name: thataway
Photos: Thataway
PostPosted: Thu Jun 21, 2012 6:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Unfortunately most anchor manufactures sizes are based on a 30 knot breeze in an anchorage without any significant wave action. Thus if you are doing serious cruising, the charts are significantly undersized.

As for as what a person can easily handle--it depends on how the anchor is brought up. If you are standing on the bow, bending over, you are going to be severely limited. If you sit down, or stand in the hatch, and keep your back straight, 25 # is easier to handle than 14 #.

The windlass is made for pulling the anchor and chain up--not for holding the boat when it is anchored, not for pulling the boat up to the anchor, and not for breaking the anchor out. The anchor rode (snubber) should be cleated off--never left on a windlass period! The boat should be powered up to the point where the anchor rode is hanging straight down, and the the engine used to break the anchor out. During this, the windlass is taking up the slack rode and chain. Best to have all chain engaged when the anchor is pulled up.

_________________
Bob Austin
Thataway
Thataway (Ex Seaweed) 2007 25 C Dory May 2018 to Oct. 2021
Thisaway 2006 22' CDory November 2011 to May 2018
Caracal 18 140 Suzuki 2007 to present
Thataway TomCat 255 150 Suzukis June 2006 thru August 2011
C Pelican; 1992, 22 Cruiser, 2002 thru 2006
Frequent Sea; 2003 C D 25, 2007 thru 2009
KA6PKB
Home port: Pensacola FL
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    The C-Brats Forum Index -> All Marinauts, All The Time All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
Page 1 of 3

 
     Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum



Page generation time: 0.1068s (PHP: 84% - SQL: 16%) - SQL queries: 33 - GZIP disabled - Debug on