View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Matt Gurnsey Dealer
Joined: 11 Nov 2008 Posts: 1532 City/Region: Port Orchard
State or Province: WA
Photos: Kitsap Marina
|
Posted: Sat Oct 29, 2011 2:08 pm Post subject: Since you asked- 9.9 versus 15 kicker |
|
|
So- if 9.9 is good, 15 must be better, right? Since up until recently most 9.9's and 15's were built on the same powerhead there was no weight penalty for going bigger. And if Smiling Bob is to be beleived, bigger is always better.
Well, maybe.
First we have to understand "hull speed". Hull speed is the teoretical maximum speed a boat can go through the water at dispacement speed.
Here's the wiki page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hull_speed
Basically, hull speed will usually be 1.34 to 1.5 times the square root of the length of the waterline.
If we assume a 22 C-Dory has a 20' waterline, then it's displacement speed is roughly 6 knots. To acheive 6 knots doesn't take a lot of horsepower. Look at some of the 40' plus trawlers running 120 Lehman deisels to acheive 6-7 knot speed.
To acheive a faster speed requires a unique hull design, or a LOT more power to get the boat to plane. (Hull design is a whole other long topic!)
So a 6 horse motor will push a 22 C-Dory to hull speed. And 8 or 9.9 will give extra torque, and some reserve for wind.
Here's where some guys get a bit confused. Often a customer will say he wants a 15 horsepower kicker to overcome tide should he be stuck offshore with the main down. It's a long ride home at 6 knots.
Here's the thing- to paraphrase Mr. Scott- "You canna change the laws of physics". So if your boat has a 6 knot hull speed, and you are going against a 6 knot current, you will basically be standing still. Unless you have enough power to get the boat on plane, and your kicker isn't going to do that.
I had a boat owner call wanting pricing on Evinrude's 60 horsepower motor. After some discssion it turns out he has a 28 Skipjack with a 7.4L Main engine, and he wants to build a custom bracket and use the 60 for a kicker motor so he can get back at better thanh six knots should the main go down. He's talking about spending $12-$15K on this project. After much discussion I talked him out of it. 60 is not always better than 10.
Another example- We had a boat in for service- a 24 Sea Sport or Osprey (I don't remember exactly, but that type of hull shape). On it was a custom built kicker bracket with a Yamaha F25 four stroke kicker motor. Because if 15 is better, than 25 must be great!
So with close to $10K into this set up does the owner get more speed? One look at the prop tells the story. The paint on the edge of all the blades is worn away. When the owner advances the throttle, the kicker motor provides more power until the boat hits hull speed. Once there, additional throttle increases power output, but not enough to get the boat on plane. Something has to give, and the prop starts to cavitate, and the exploding air bubbles wear away the paint.
This owner has spent a lot more money, burns more fuel, and maybe gets an extra 1/4 to 1/2 knot out of the kicker motor.
He would have been better served with a Yamaha High Thrust 9.9. Only ten horsepower, but a slower turning, larger prop with better bite in the water. Like the "granny" gear in a truck, it gets the heavy load moving at slower speeds.
So (to answer the question that started all this) what should one have on a 25 C-Dory? Theroretical hull speed is about 6.5 knots. I would suggest any of the high thrust 9.9 products on the market as being a better match for kicker duty. Merc does make a 15 kicker, and if you must have 15 then it might be an option.
As a commission sales person I make more off of the 15, but the 9.9 will do everything you need for less. I would rather sell you the right tool for the job then more than you need.
Now, I have to go join Mr. Scott for further physics lessens, and the tasting of a liquid he describes as "green". _________________ Matt Gurnsey
Kitsap Marina
www.kitsapmarina.com
360-895-2193
(888) 293-7991 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
JamesTXSD
Joined: 01 Mar 2005 Posts: 7484 City/Region: from island boy to desert dweller
State or Province: AZ
C-Dory Year: 2007
C-Dory Model: 25 Cruiser
Vessel Name: "Wild Blue" (sold 9/14)
Photos: Wild Blue
|
Posted: Sat Oct 29, 2011 2:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thank you for the physics lesson AND putting the customers' needs up front - you da man!
Best wishes,
Jim B. _________________ Jim & Joan
CD-25 "Wild Blue" (sold August 2014)
http://captnjim.blogspot.com/
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Capital Sea
Joined: 16 Dec 2007 Posts: 425 City/Region: Olympia
State or Province: WA
C-Dory Year: 2007
C-Dory Model: 22 Cruiser
Vessel Name: Capital Sea
Photos: Capital Sea
|
Posted: Sat Oct 29, 2011 2:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
All of that physics was nice and helpful and all but the real issue comes down to digits. 90 and 9.9 just go well together. 90 and 15, not so much. _________________ Capn Steve & 1st Mate Kath
Save our Sound! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Dreamer
Joined: 01 Jan 2006 Posts: 1766 City/Region: Really Sunny SaddleBrooke
State or Province: AZ
Photos: Dreamer
|
Posted: Sat Oct 29, 2011 7:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
So, Dr. Matt, how do you compute the hull speed of a cat? What size kicker, mounted between the mains, would push a TC-255 to hull speed? Not so much for trolling but for economical low speed exploring. _________________ Roger
Once a C-Brat, always a C-Brat
Dreamer- Sold 25 Feb. 2013 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Pat Anderson
Joined: 02 Nov 2003 Posts: 8556 City/Region: Birch Bay, WA
State or Province: WA
C-Dory Year: 2005
C-Dory Model: 25 Cruiser
Vessel Name: Daydream
Photos: Daydream and Crabby Lou
|
Posted: Sat Oct 29, 2011 7:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yes, and 150 and 15, 150 and 9.9 not so much. Would like to hear from Les, he hung the 15 on Daydream, as I recall he said either would work but we might like the 15 better for the extra torque, which if I read Matt right is pretty much non-existent.
Capital Sea wrote: | All of that physics was nice and helpful and all but the real issue comes down to digits. 90 and 9.9 just go well together. 90 and 15, not so much. |
_________________
DAYDREAM - CD25 Cruiser
CRABBY LOU - CD16 Angler (sold 2020)
Pat & Patty Anderson, C-Brat #62!
http://daydreamsloop.blogspot.com
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Northern Pike
Joined: 29 Sep 2011 Posts: 16 City/Region: Whitehorse
State or Province: YT
C-Dory Year: 2009
C-Dory Model: 19 Angler
|
Posted: Sat Oct 29, 2011 8:55 pm Post subject: Kicker size |
|
|
That was interesting reading. How do I figure out the size of motor for my 19' Angler? What do I need to overcome strong wind and rough water on Yukon Lakes? And where should it be mounted? On the transom or on a bracket?
Thanks, Peter. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
forrest
Joined: 02 Nov 2003 Posts: 387 City/Region: Chehalis
State or Province: WA
C-Dory Year: 2007
C-Dory Model: 26 Venture
Vessel Name: Long Story
Photos: Long Story
|
Posted: Sat Oct 29, 2011 11:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I understand the hull speed issue. However when I find myself in the bottom of a trough I'll take the extra horsepower to push the stern around and straighten up the boat before the next wave arrives. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Wandering Sagebrush
Joined: 21 Jan 2005 Posts: 2783 City/Region: Northeast Oregon
State or Province: OR
C-Dory Year: 2005
C-Dory Model: 22 Cruiser
Vessel Name: Constant Craving
Photos: Constant Craving
|
Posted: Sat Oct 29, 2011 11:35 pm Post subject: Re: Since you asked- 9.9 versus 15 kicker |
|
|
Matt Gurnsey wrote: | So- if 9.9 is good, 15 must be better, right?
<<Stuff Clipped>>
As a commission sales person I make more off of the 15, but the 9.9 will do everything you need for less. I would rather sell you the right tool for the job then more than you need.
<<More Stuff Clipped>> |
I sure wish that this was the philosophy of every person selling any product...
Hats off to Matt! _________________ "And in the end, it's not the years in your life that count. It's the life in your years." - Abraham Lincoln |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
localboy
Joined: 30 Sep 2006 Posts: 4673 City/Region: Lake Stevens via Honolulu
State or Province: WA
C-Dory Year: 2007
C-Dory Model: 25 Cruiser
Vessel Name: 'Au Kai (Ocean Traveler)
Photos: 'AU KAI
|
Posted: Sun Oct 30, 2011 12:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Interesting timing. I just had Les install a Tohatsu 9.9 on the 25. I'm looking at merely a get home/get to a safe harbor kicker, not a trolling motor. It is not a hi-thrust model, as those come only w/ power trim/tilt and I wanted the KISS principle. He advised it should do fine w/ one caveat; depending on tide/wind conditions. I asked about the 4 blade (hi-thrust) prop and he said to try the boat w/ the standard three blade first. He said I'll only get power up to about 3/4 throttle anyway; after that there won't be any discernible difference.
Back when I bought the boat from Matt I inquired about kickers. He told me at that time that a 9.9 was more than sufficient. It's good to see he still thinks so! And Matt, I commend your honesty and putting the customer first. Not all salesmen have your integrity. _________________ "We can go over there...behind the 'little one'....."
Wife to her husband pointing @ us...from the bow of their 50-footer; Prideaux Haven 2013 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
C-Gypsy
Joined: 02 Mar 2006 Posts: 241 City/Region: Oriental
State or Province: NC
C-Dory Year: 2006
C-Dory Model: 22 Cruiser
Vessel Name: C-Gypsy
Photos: C-Gypsy
|
Posted: Sun Oct 30, 2011 3:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Good read Matt. Thanks!
I am one of the few, the proud, the ones who have a 90 & 9.9!  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
BrentB
Joined: 15 Jul 2006 Posts: 4420 City/Region: Greenwood
State or Province: IN
Photos: BrentB
|
Posted: Sun Oct 30, 2011 9:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
thanks!
Still working on the woodchuck chucking wood solution  _________________ Brent Barrett |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Matt Gurnsey Dealer
Joined: 11 Nov 2008 Posts: 1532 City/Region: Port Orchard
State or Province: WA
Photos: Kitsap Marina
|
Posted: Mon Oct 31, 2011 2:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Dreamer wrote: | So, Dr. Matt, how do you compute the hull speed of a cat? What size kicker, mounted between the mains, would push a TC-255 to hull speed? Not so much for trolling but for economical low speed exploring. |
Well, you had to go there, didn't you!
Cats are a whole other animal, so to speak. Long skinny hulls are easier to push through the water, and can exceed the 1.34 to 1.5 rule of thumb for hull speed. Look at how fast a kayak can move through the water- based purely on waterline lenght they should not be able to go as fast as they do, and they certainly don't plane.
Glacier Bay is another example. Their hull is a displacment hull that can be driven to a much higher speed that the hull speed of a similar size mono hull. It doesn't plane.
The Tomcat uses a planing hull design, but at displacments speed have the ability to go faster than the same size mono hull.
That all being said, I think a high thrust style 9.9 will have better perfromance than a standard 15 because of the gear ratio / prop style advantage. Additionally, you'll probably need an extra long shaft length, which may only be available on the 9.9 models.
But I don't have any first hand knowledge on kickers on Tomcats. I know we got asked a lot of questions about them at shows. My guess is that the 9.9 that will push the 25 Cruiser to 6.5 knots might push a Tomcat faster because of the hull shape, and be able to use that top 25% Mark was talking about.. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Matt Gurnsey Dealer
Joined: 11 Nov 2008 Posts: 1532 City/Region: Port Orchard
State or Province: WA
Photos: Kitsap Marina
|
Posted: Mon Oct 31, 2011 2:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
C-Gypsy wrote: | Good read Matt. Thanks!
I am one of the few, the proud, the ones who have a 90 & 9.9!  |
It would look really cool if they made a 9.0!  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Matt Gurnsey Dealer
Joined: 11 Nov 2008 Posts: 1532 City/Region: Port Orchard
State or Province: WA
Photos: Kitsap Marina
|
Posted: Mon Oct 31, 2011 2:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Pat Anderson wrote: | Yes, and 150 and 15, 150 and 9.9 not so much. Would like to hear from Les, he hung the 15 on Daydream, as I recall he said either would work but we might like the 15 better for the extra torque, which if I read Matt right is pretty much non-existent.
|
The 15 will have more torque if it's a bigger displacement, which all of the brands now are. Of course this comes with a weight penalty, which the 25 can handle better than a 22 could. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Wefings Dealer
Joined: 29 Nov 2005 Posts: 2086 City/Region: Panhandle
State or Province: FL
Photos: Cruise Ship #4
|
Posted: Mon Oct 31, 2011 5:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
What about the head wrenching, neck snapping acceleration the 15 provides over the 9.9 ? How come we don't talk about that ?
I wanna see some zero to hull speed numbers.......
Marc _________________ Wefings Marine Website
Since 1909 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|