The C-Brats Forum Index
HomeForumsMy TopicsCalendarEvent SignupsMemberlistOur C-DorysThe Brat MapPhotos

Help with hydraulic steering choice

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    The C-Brats Forum Index -> General Chat
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Salmon Fisher



Joined: 07 Aug 2009
Posts: 878
City/Region: Arlington
State or Province: WA
C-Dory Year: 2004
C-Dory Model: 25 Cruiser
Vessel Name: Kim Christine
Photos: Kim Christine
PostPosted: Fri Oct 09, 2009 11:45 pm    Post subject: Help with hydraulic steering choice Reply with quote

I have been wondering the difference between a Baystar and Seastar hydraulic unit for my boat that has twin Honda 40s. I have read the teleflex recommendations and they say the Seastar unit is for dual motors. The Seastar is more expensive than Baystar unit and like everyone, I want to save money where it makes sense to.

However, the Baystar unit is rated for 150 hp, which is far below the 80 combined hp of my Hondas.

My question: Can I install a Baystar unit and be ok? Will the helm pump and steering cylinder do their job without being overtaxed by the dual 40s? I have the installed tie bar, which would be above steering cylinder. BTW, Jim on Work Release has the Baystar unit, but it is a 2004 unit. Are the ones produced now of lighter/cheaper materials?

Thanks in advance, looks in archives, couldn't locate an answer.

_________________
Patrick and Kim Walker

2004 25 Cruiser-Present

2000 22 Cruiser 2009-2014 (Sold)
2006 25 Cruiser 2014-2019 (Sold)
1985 22 Classic -2019 (Sold)
1991 19 Arima Sea Ranger-2019-2021 (Sold)
2015 27 Ranger Tug-2019-2023 (Sold)
1987 22 Cruiser -2021-2023 (Sold)

Honey, this REALLY will be my last boat, honest!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Papillon



Joined: 31 Mar 2005
Posts: 949
City/Region: DeBary, Fl. *On the St. John's River*
State or Province: FL
C-Dory Year: 1993
C-Dory Model: 22 Angler
Vessel Name: Papillon
Photos: Papillon
PostPosted: Sat Oct 10, 2009 12:29 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Others on this site with much more command of the engineering skills can give you the techno reasons why you should follow the manufacturers recommendations, but let me give you my insight on the main reason.

Have you ever been skimming across the water with your love ones on board and had a steering cable break. Well I have and it was not a pretty sight. People flying, Capt. hanging on to a wheel that wasn't helping.

All turned out ok..in the end. But only by the grace of god.

It just doesn't make any sense to let $$$ dictate your choices where your life and those of your friends and family are involved. So it is my opinion that you should follow the manufacturers advice and go with the Seastar...It's the one on my boat by the way...
115 Suzuki Single on a 22 Angler.

_________________
Mike Taylor
330-936-1030

1993 Angler-02' 115 Suzuki 4 Stroke
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
digger



Joined: 02 Nov 2003
Posts: 496
City/Region: Spokane
State or Province: WA
C-Dory Year: 1993
C-Dory Model: 22 Angler
Vessel Name: C-Sik
Photos: Snoopy-C
PostPosted: Sat Oct 10, 2009 12:51 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The seastar is the heavier duty unit, and originally was different in that the cylinder moved thus turning the motor while the rod remained stationary in the tilt tube. The baystar had the cylinder stationary and the rod moved. The seastar requires premade hoses, while the baystar has tubes that can be cut to size. The seastar was the only unit that was approved to accept a second helm station. Also, the autopilot would have to be mounted on the helm for the baystar, while a hydraulic autopilot could be plumbed into the seastar, or it could be mounted on the helm itself. I think that both units are now designed to operate similarly regarding the cylinder, but I'm pretty sure the baystar still can use the cut to fit hoses. The baystar has been standard equipment on the 19 foot c-dories . Either are a significant improvement over the cable helms, and provide no feedback, so the steering wheel can be unattended and the motor torque will not spin the wheel. Ron
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Yahoo Messenger
ccflyer



Joined: 19 Sep 2005
Posts: 391
City/Region: Bradenton, FL
State or Province: FL
C-Dory Year: 2003
C-Dory Model: 22 Cruiser
Vessel Name: Retriever
Photos: ccflyer
PostPosted: Sat Oct 10, 2009 7:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Specs on this site seem to indicate you can't use the Baystar with twins.

"Twin engine applications not available at this time." Cry

http://www.foreandaftmarine.com/1-BAYSTAR.htm

_________________

There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness".
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Hunkydory



Joined: 28 Mar 2005
Posts: 2723
City/Region: Cokeville, Wyoming
State or Province: WY
C-Dory Year: 2000
C-Dory Model: 22 Cruiser
Vessel Name: Hunkydory
Photos: Hunkydory-Jay-and-Jolee
PostPosted: Sun Oct 11, 2009 12:02 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

ccflyer wrote:
Specs on this site seem to indicate you can't use the Baystar with twins.

"Twin engine applications not available at this time." Cry

http://www.foreandaftmarine.com/1-BAYSTAR.htm


That's what it said back in 2005, when we switched to hydraulic using the baystar. At that time the C-Dory Factory was installing baystar as an option on 22 cruisers, so called and asked their opinion. Was told if I wanted to spend the extra with seastar go ahead, but baystar was more than adequate with twin Honda 40's. I had enough confidence in baystar to do our "Alaska 2007 Inland Passage Wilderness Cruise" that many have read about in the Grand Adventure Forum. If it makes you feel better and you can afford it spend the extra for the seastar, but personally I think its a waste of money that could be better spent elsewhere.

Jay

_________________
Jay and Jolee 2000 22 CD cruiser Hunkydory
I will not waste my days in trying to prolong them------Jack London
https://share.delorme.com/JuliusByers
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Salmon Fisher



Joined: 07 Aug 2009
Posts: 878
City/Region: Arlington
State or Province: WA
C-Dory Year: 2004
C-Dory Model: 25 Cruiser
Vessel Name: Kim Christine
Photos: Kim Christine
PostPosted: Mon Oct 12, 2009 11:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks for the feedback. I, in no way, want to compromise safety by going with a steering unit that is subpar.

I would be interested if others with twins, 40s or 50s, have the Baystar unit and what their level of satisfaction is. Does anyone know when Seastar was brought out?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Don and Brenda



Joined: 22 Feb 2009
Posts: 588
City/Region: Camano Island, Wa
State or Province: WA
C-Dory Year: 2011
C-Dory Model: R-27 Tug
Photos: C-Quest
PostPosted: Mon Oct 12, 2009 11:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I have a 2007 with twin 40 Suzuki and it came with Seastar steering.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Jack in Alaska



Joined: 17 Aug 2004
Posts: 1192
City/Region: Anchorage/Ninilchik
State or Province: AK
C-Dory Year: 2005
C-Dory Model: 26 Pro Angler
Vessel Name: HIGH TIDE II
Photos: HIGH TIDE II
PostPosted: Tue Oct 13, 2009 1:43 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

You will love that new hydraulic steering and will wonder why you waited so long to change it out.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Matt Gurnsey
Dealer


Joined: 11 Nov 2008
Posts: 1532
City/Region: Port Orchard
State or Province: WA
Photos: Kitsap Marina
PostPosted: Tue Oct 13, 2009 12:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Keep in mind that when manufacturers talk about twins- twin 40 / 50's never even occurs to them.

The Baystar should be more than up to the task of handling the torque of twin 40's.

_________________
Matt Gurnsey
Kitsap Marina
www.kitsapmarina.com
360-895-2193
(888) 293-7991
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Salmon Fisher



Joined: 07 Aug 2009
Posts: 878
City/Region: Arlington
State or Province: WA
C-Dory Year: 2004
C-Dory Model: 25 Cruiser
Vessel Name: Kim Christine
Photos: Kim Christine
PostPosted: Tue Oct 13, 2009 11:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ok, well, looks like I will go with the Baystar, thought it would be up to the task.

Thanks everyone for the input.

Patrick
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
thataway



Joined: 02 Nov 2003
Posts: 21507
City/Region: Pensacola
State or Province: FL
C-Dory Year: 2007
C-Dory Model: 25 Cruiser
Vessel Name: thataway
Photos: Thataway
PostPosted: Wed Oct 14, 2009 7:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

One difference in the twins, is that the Sea Star has the capacity to handle the Liquid tie bar--where the two engines each have a hydraulic cylinder and there is a hydraulic connection between the two engines. This is in opposition to the twin 40's where you are using a single cylinder and a mechanical tie bar. I would suspect that with the mechanical tie bar you would be fine. If you were to go to the dual cylinders, then you should go to the Sea Star.
_________________
Bob Austin
Thataway
Thataway (Ex Seaweed) 2007 25 C Dory May 2018 to Oct. 2021
Thisaway 2006 22' CDory November 2011 to May 2018
Caracal 18 140 Suzuki 2007 to present
Thataway TomCat 255 150 Suzukis June 2006 thru August 2011
C Pelican; 1992, 22 Cruiser, 2002 thru 2006
Frequent Sea; 2003 C D 25, 2007 thru 2009
KA6PKB
Home port: Pensacola FL
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    The C-Brats Forum Index -> General Chat All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
     Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum



Page generation time: 0.0624s (PHP: 69% - SQL: 31%) - SQL queries: 28 - GZIP disabled - Debug on